My Dog Huck

MY PLAN included bungee cords to insure that if I wasn’t dashed to pieces on the first fall, I would be on the second, third or fourth.

My main obstacle was laziness. I’d have to write something (a biting epitaph) order a tombstone, get a thousand feet of rubber surgical tubing for just the right kind of that snappy slingshot action, rack up huge debts, tell everyone what I really thought of them, get someone I secretly despise to fall in love with me and make sure that nothing would be left to my children or ex-wives.

It was too much work. I filled my pipe and was off wandering in the Netherlands when I felt a gentle tug on my pant leg.

It was my dog Huck.

Huck was a cinnamon colored German shepherd who always wanted out. He would usually spend his days with his chin on my knee while I typed, looking up at me with doleful eyes silently begging to be taken for walk. His nights were spent at the foot of my bed, waiting for the next day to begin.

In the afternoons when I would arise, Huck would be in his most charming happy self, which he would use to get me out of bed to start the new day, begging to be let out.

We slept in a long windowless hallway. At one time it was the entrance to the Gould and Curry Mine. It was from here that James Fair snuck a team of miners into the mine down to the 1,500 foot level and began drilling and blasting their way north into what eventually become known as the Big Bonanza, the world’s greatest discovery of silver, so big it caused the worldwide financial crisis of the 1870’s, making him and his three partners, Mackay, O’Brien and Flood four of the world’s richest men.

But that was long ago. The mines were played out and now the mine entrance was my bedroom. As I approached the refridgerator (I know, I know, it isn’t spelled with a d, I’ll take care of it later) at the end of the narrow kitchen, Huck would dance ahead of me, and at the same time, at the same spot, every day, he would look back to see if I was coming, notice he had a bushy tail . . like “what the is that?” and running around in a circle, snap at it three times .

His tail was an elusive thing. Once it was up and wagging he could never catch it.

Well, on this one particular day, when I had been in deep reverie for couple of hours too long, he left off asking and took to tugging and growling a bit as he pulled on my pant leg.

“Hey! Cut it out!” I yelled, but he just pulled harder. I had to get up an hop on one foot. “Stop it! Stop yankin‘ on my leg, you’ll pul it off,” I yelled, but it just made him put his back into it and dig his paws into the rug, like he was fighting over tenderloin with a pit bull.

If it wasn’t for the fact that I was wearing Wahmaker denim pants with thick strap suspenders nailed to them an strong steel posts, he would have pulled them right off me, butt naked.

I had to capitulate.

“Alright, alright,” I lied. He instantly dropped my leg and shot for the southeastern side door.

The Flowery hills west of Virginia City might be called mountains, but in my metrology they only rate as a piedmont leading up to something much bigger. The white capped giants of the Sierra Nevadas off on the horizon . . now those are mountains.

A bricked path by the Mackay Mansion runs east towards them under cherry blooms, past rusting mine junk in front of a beautifully manicured cool green lawn. Huck dashed for it, leapt the gate, flopped, wriggled and rolled, rubbing his back on it like a beached sturgeon. So much for a walk.

He jumped up, looked around with ears forward. Something leapt the boundaries of the yard, a mule deer, and Huck was off in a blur in hot pursuit of clattering hooves, barking, me screaming his name to come back.

They headed up the hill through an empty lot to main street. I chugged up Flowery Street towards C Street, yelling “Huck! “Huck!”

Dogs need names that can be comfortably yelled loudly, without reservation or embarrassment. I named a rat terrier “Howdy” once and in a situation similar to the one I’m describing a man said “Well, hello God damnit!”

I learned my lesson on dog names from that, and so it was no distraction when I yelled Huck‘s. Some angry whiskered guy with his teeth all rotted out yelled back at me, “your dog is chasing a mule deer through traffic!”

Huck was so magnifiently big and supernaturally fast that by the time I got to the top of the street he had finished his pursuit and returned home. I tried to recover some of my dignity by asking, “You mean that dog there?“ Gabby Hayes was as puzzled as I was, but I didn’t show it.

“Well who was that?” he said. “His evil twin?”

I acted like I knew.

When I came stumbling back into the yard, Huck tore around crazily, kicking up bits of lawn, and then turned on me, racing at full speed until he was about six feet away, where he got airborne, lunging directly at my face, whizzing by my ear like a missile.

When I turned around he was fifteen feet away at the gate to the path, looking over his shoulder at me like, “what are you waiting for, let’s go!”

Next: How Huck saved my life

METHOD OF SELF DEMISE

After they pulled President Grant back up out of that hole when they dangled him down there for a look see, he said that the siege on Vicksburg was nothing compared to being slowly lowered into the Combination Shaft.

He bit off the end of a cigar and said “that’s as close to hell as I’ve ever been.”

Every  homeopath ought to have a favorite method of self demise in the event that should the Sanhedrin of Pharmaceutical Corporations manage to turn the crowd nasty enough against him, he can slip away behind this thin veil of wrath and tears by doing it himself . . in a comfortable enough way . . and rob the mob of a lynching.

That hole was mine. It was my favorite theoretical method of self-demise. During the first years of the new millenium, my plan was to throw myself into the Combination Shaft of the Hale and Norcross Mine, about 1000 yards from my back door at the Mackay Mansion in Virginia City, Nevada.

It would have surely been my demise if it hadn’t been for my faithful dog Huck.

At one time the Combination Shaft was rated to be the deepest hole on Earth, but it quickly lost that designation with the accumulation of old cars, muscatel wine bottles and non-paying customers from the brothels on B street.

It was dug during post bellum times by US Senator “Slippery Jim” Fair (R-Nev) on the promise to its investors that besides striking veins of native silver and gold, it would be deep enough to provide a non circuitous route to the Orient, be a source of cheap goods and basement to the world’s first Walmart.

Fair tried fooling his investors by salting the shaft with some cheap garden equipment and a few Chinese who would sneak in through a secret tunnel that led to the shaft from the 24 hour Happy Mandarin Restaurant, but they were found out by a trail of chow mein and fortune cookie crumbs culminating in the  scam being abandoned and the shaft used as the world’s biggest garbage can.

You may wish to say that it’s not true, but the legend goes that whatever went into the Combination Shaft did not come out. By the time anything [as big as a breadbox or larger] thrown in it got to the bottom, there wasn’t anything left of it, because it woud have been dashed to pieces from bouncing back and forth off the sides of the Shaft.

This worked for a while until it was overflowing and everyone in Virginia City was complaining about the smell. This went on for a while until Adoph Sutro, the Jewish mayor of San Francisco, seized on an idea.  Virginia City, you see, clings to the side of a mountain high above lesser towns like Reno and Carson City. So what Sutro did was to dig a tunnel horizontally through the mountain into the Shaft from a starting point on the Great Basin below, and flushed it out  like a clogged up toilet, draining it, the fountainhead being what is near Dayton, Nevada, now the world’s Mecca for bottle collectors, second hand clothes and old car parts.

When the dam was opened, the first things to come exploding out of the Sutro Tunnel were just bits of broken glass, scraps of clothing and bone, and rusted old car parts, and other stuff I forgot to mention, but as the flow continued, the condition of goods got better and better due to the ones on top not falling so far, until finally, at the end of the flow, the bottles were unbroken, and there entirely intact antique automobiles and vintage clothing that . . once the bones were shook out of them . . went on the rack to command a handsome price.

There were even stories that towards the end of Sutro’s “Gold” Rush, a few of those non paying customers of the brothels on B street came running out of the tunnel under their own power, the “bottomless pit” having become so shallow that they landed without much damage . . and glad to still be alive.

[It is said that this is where Jack Benny got his 1925 Maxwell Touring Automobile, still in perfect condition after having been abandoned by some rich tourists from Chile, when it accidentally fell into the Shaft during a mine tour.]

So because of Sutro’s ingenuity the shaft was once again a deep, dark, cold hole . . back to it original 3,250 feet.

Waiting for me, beckoning to me. “Come, come, have a nice long rest. Put yourself out of your hot misery. It’s nice and cool down here . . ” it said.

“I’m not hot, I’m cold . .” I replied . .

“Yes, yes, cold, be cold no more, it’s nice and warm down here, past the geothermal gradient.”

The VACANCY sign in my mind was lit . .

Follow the John Benneth Journal on Twitter:

 Follow JBennethJournal on Twitter

How to be Happy

What I’ve really had problems with in my sixty years culminating in this post is being consistently happy. The search for happiness is something people have thrown themselves at before, and I thought that before sharing my 5X12 with it I‘d check out to see what others have to say.

Here’s an example of it with a somewhat religious feel by a gentleman going by the name of Richard Innes. In case the subtlety of the man’s name escapes you, he has provided a more direct approach by actually inserting the nickname for Richard before his family name, inviting people to call him “Dick” Innes, in an essay entitled. The Search for Happiness”

I was very excited about the prospect of writing an essay on how to be happy . . until I read the one above by Mr. Innes. After I got over the ironic shock of the man’s name on such a topic, I had to confess his essay was much better than anything I could even hope to write . . and this left me in a deep depression.

Whereas mine would be full of cheap tricks, like

“knock off the Chinese herbs, eat a steak, drink a couple of glasses of wine, have a couple cups of coffee, smoke a couple of cigarettes and go for a walk”

Dick Innes’ is full of sage advice and the wisdom of the ages, saying stuff like

“Wealth, fame, power, beauty … neither make one happy or unhappy. They are externals. Happiness comes from within. It is a by-product of an inner condition. If one lives only for personal happiness, he will probably never find it. As one person said, ‘The search for happiness is one of the chief sources of unhappiness.’”

Glug, what? With superior advice like that, what could I reasonably do but put a revolver to my head, pull back the hammer, refer my readers to what “Dick Innes” wrote . . and then pull the trigger?

The Dick Innes webpage header shows a man much younger and better looking than me, reclining with his beautiful wife and angelic looking children, set on a flowered idyllic green background, all smiling.

The only consolation here is that this is not Dick Innes, his wife and kids. I’ve seen his picture. He is a much older man than the one shown in the header, thank God. I don’t think I could stand it if Dick Innes was young and handsome. It’s one thing to be young, beautiful and smiling like they just won the lottery, but also being the author of such epic, sagacious advice with such a clever name  would be devastating to my now flattened self-esteem.

The secret implication is that whereas it would seem that while all the rest of us are searching for it, Dick Innes has found it.

So, as you can see, the fact the young man in the header here is not Dick Innes islittle consolation. The i suggestion here is that these people took Dick Innes’ advice, and now they’re happy . .

Not only do I have no living examples like this, of my wisdom incarnate, but by what Dick Innes says, if I tried showing what happens to people who took my advice, I’d have to show some family on the gallows, set on a background of a cemetery.

Well, this alone would be enough to make me want to kill myself. But no, wait, as the TV pitchman says, there’s more. Dick Innes has to go on and remove all doubt from my mind that I should take my life with my own hand. He does this with his continual showing, word by word, sentence after sentence, in one crushing paragraph after another, that there is really nothing I can do to top what he wrote, except to plagiarise it:

He writes such golden words like:

“To be in touch with all of one’s feelings is more important than being happy all of the time.”

Yeowch!

And . .

“It is a wise man who helps his wife find, develop, and use her special gifts. He will reap just rewards through his wife’s increased fulfillment and happiness.”

Oh God. If I did that I’d have to help my wife disguise a human catapult to look like a comfy chair, so with a remote control, throwing me out of the house wouldn’t be dependent on any of my own volition. It wouldn’t matter if I knew of its ejection powers, the same lack of willpower that saves me from obeying the order to vacate the premises would be what would fail to stop me from sitting down in this comfortable looking recliner . .

In fact, there have been times in my life when the situation got to be so difficult, that like now, I thought about ending it all. Before I married my current wife, I spent a lot of time trying to devise a way of doing it nicely, until I met a man who had invented an automatic self-burial machine.

NEXT: FAVORITE METHODS OF SELF-DEMISE

PS: Among other misleading words, the meta tags include a phrase meant to entice people to read my blog who (1) otherwise would not do so. Everyone should know that the best way to beat a draw of lots is to not play. I knew a man who won 10 million dollars in the lottery and subsequently tried to drink himself to death, but died before he could accomplish it. Now, (2) if you still feel you were cheated, I suggest you encourage others to read this blog by the usual means of referral, such as Twitter or Facebook, kindly suggesting that it will make them feel better, and then (3) return to enjoy their angry  comments below . .

MEDICAL EXILE

The Allopathic Murder Association

The American Medical Association (AMA, better known to homeopaths as the Allopathic Murder Association) representing popular mainstream medicine recently broke down and confessed, in the open court of their journal, to using properly prescribed and properly administered patent allopathic pharmaceuticals to kill around 300,000 people a year in the US alone.

100,000 of those die of drug overdoses in hospital. The rest are gunned down during escape attempts., usually within 20 miles of the institution. Although a many make it more than a few feet beyond the death chamber door, virtually no American ever makes it all the way to France, Cuba or Italy . . not even Canada,  where they can live in peace as medical exiles.

The excuse for this, that allopathy is all that stands between the patient and the Boatman, is a necessary fabrication by the AMA, and for the sake of population control must remain so.

In order to get away with it, allopathic murderers have to hide behind a thin veil of pretended do-gooding. And this is their assurance that out of the context of assisted suicide, and in the context that there is another form of treatment, at worst they would only be convicted of manslaughter.

In the meantime, without the daily recognition of real medicine, which they have but can’t patent, the average allopath wanders around in a psychosis, like a volunteer neighborhood night watchman, looking for his next victim to tattoo with a Very. Big. Nightmare.

Sure. Instead of the neighborhood association cheering them on, they have the patent pharmaceutical industry to do it for them . . with money . . bales of it.

Of course we can’t entirely blame the pusher. These guys have been dealing dangerous drugs as medicine for centuries now and getting away with it. This isn’t a scientific problem, it’s a financial one.

The streets would be full of the jobless wandering the streets . . more than there are now . . if homeopathy were to replace allopathy, as it should.

Which is better? A few homeless homeopaths barking at the drug dealers, or a nation of healthy, unemployed derelicts?

The Case Against the Case Against Homeopathy

Have you read the previous blog? I hope so, it might give you a better context into which to put . .

The Case Against the Case Against Homeopathy

SHOUT OUT to homeopaths in the home of Hahnemann, Germany; and homeopaths all over the world, in Ireland; Austria; Pakistan; Chile; Poland, Canada; Australia; India; the Netherlands; Croatia; Argentina; Iceland; Togo; the home of Clarke, the United Kingdom; and the home of Kent, the US of A, all who have been reading this column. Thanks for your support . . theoretically

You can stop reading now: THERE IS NO CASE AGAINST HOMEOPATHY.

There never has been and there never will be.

The rest of this blog is entertaiment of the type you’d find on a Roman holiday.

THE PROBLEM WITH theoretical reasoning, it always falls and fails under the grinding wheel of everyday use, and should it ever be hauled into the assizes, there’s always a jury: Half who knows somebody who has tried homeopathy  . .  and swears by it . . and half who knows somebody who hasn’t . . and swears at it.

Homeopathy isn’t easy to explain to people who aren’t familiar with it, and even harder to explain to people who are . . or think they are. Bu then again nobody has really been able to explain gravity very well, either. Those who have tried it swear it’s for real, but like homeopathy, try to explain it to someone who isn’t familiar with it’s effects and you may get a puzzled look, and hear them say they’d rather stick with levity.

And just because we can’t explain how something works doesn’t stop us from using it if we know it does. Thank God we don’t have 13th century scientists following us around in pushcarts telling us we can’t listen to our radios or watch our TVs, use our toasters or launch our pets and heroes into outer space, because they “don’t know how it works, it’s too implausible . . its the work of the devil!

OR PLACEBOS . .

And presumably, to them, neither do we know how all these rather obtuse things work, because our explanation for how they do won’t suffice for the zeusophobe who has already decided it’s psychogenic, i.e. the operator is responsible, possessed by the Devil, or in 21st century terms, in the mad thrall of a placebo.

Though they’ll never admit it, the sad fact is there are a number of things that don’t make sense, even to the most gifted atheist or prize winning scientist, things such as ontology, the study of Being, or why it is that hasn’t crushed by its own weight yet?

The rest of us lamebrains are compelled to ask, why must Atheists and Intelligent Design authors fight? Why must Creationists and Evolutionists quarrel like dogs over what is Holy to them? What is there in Bible ink that doesn’t jibe with chalk dust?

In the sage words of Rodney King after his Hyundai was pulled over for breaking a hundred MPH downtown (and he was truncheoned into a flapjack) “why can’t we all just get along?”

Exactly . . although maybe not going as fast as Romney, but who’s to criticize another man’s direction? I don’t hear our Australian jurists trying to kick that one out of bed.

This digresses down to demands for minute details as examples, like the contradicting figures “scientists” give us for the size and age of the observable Universe, a 48 billion or so light year radius mistake that made it to that size in only 13.7 billion light years. Talk about speeding, even Rodney King couldn’t explain that one.

Oh, they will surely cough up some hairball explanation for it, to be sure, mumble something about an “expanding Universe,” but common sense impounds us not to make it worse with a dumb excuse like that one, just take Rodney’s advice and STFU the next time you break the light speed barrier, talk to my hand, call my attorney, get a job.

Confused? Well let me put it this way. Why is it that the objects most distant from the eye, those galaxies, quasars and nebulae, look about the same age as those much closer . . ? Shouldn’t they all be proto galaxies, quasars and nebulae?

These calculating minds, such as the one that prepares bulls against homeopathy in Australia, and the one that touts it in the UK Guardian, should be able to explain to us why it is that telescopes can view perfectly modern galacti well beyond what should be the limits of astronomical observations, the radius of 13.7 billion light years . . i.e. 6.85, an eight of what all these logically attuned, homeopathy-hating astromoners claim it to be.

I SUGGEST TO YOU THIS is why junior James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) astronomer and homeopathy-hater Neil deGrasse Tyson is in a state of perpetual hyperventilation; why JREF astronomer and homeopathy-hater Phil Plaitt runs away from cameras held by believers; and why JREF eponym James Randi has to play three card Monte with the code to the double blind for every homeopathy biochemical lab test he witnesses.

 Well, pshaw you say, what about shooting all the homeopaths? What do the sunspots on Arcturus have to do with that, that’s why we’re here isn’t it?

Well, I say, I may seem to be rambling because I can’t see my prepared notes due to the blindfold, and I haven’t finished my cigarette yet, and I thought that besides supper the condemned gets a few last words in edgewise, you see, and I find it fascinating, if not celestially funny, that the spoken size of the Universe, in total, matches Avogadro’s number, 10 to the 23rd, the point in serial dilution, when it so happens, by some wild coincidence, the homeopathic remedy ascends from the material to etheric, where the van der waal forces take over in structure from what was formerly the domain of heterogeneous molecular composition, and not one, not one in a Godzillion of the intended molecule is left in solution, when it goes from dumb science into the spiritual dimension.

But wait!

This can also be put into the atheist’s dimension of astronomical and homeopathic wonders by saying that what we see, (although it may look like a lot) is hardly worth mentioning. In fact, like they say of the high dilute, it‘s nothing at all. The theoretical size of the unseen Universe, that which is beyond myopia, is estimated (without any intended regard to homeopathy) to be 10-23rd power times larger than the observable Universe.

By material standards, in our observable Universe, we are real enough, but in our theoretical one we are nothing at all.

Same as the case against homeopathy.

NEXT: Implausible as it may seem . .

Follow the John Benneth Journal on Twitter:

 Follow JBennethJournal on Twitter

Homeopathy Beyond Myopia

Homeopathy, the legal view.

The case against it picks up steam

Here we go again . .

After 200 years of phenomenal growth, clinical use for over 70,000 symptoms and superior results in epidemics and popularity among loyal users, there is still great opposition, it would seem, to homeopathy.

Here’s the latest. Apparently some jurist pedant in Australia has just discovered homeopathy, and a well known critic of homeopathy is trying to take it to the bank . . again.

http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/comment-blogs/-/blogs/13779346/homeopathy-the-legal-view

They just don’t get it . . it would seem.

There’s obviously some money in naysaying and pretending to be stupid. The fact of the matter is homeopathy is an obvious threat to the pharmaceutical industry. Not as a competitor . . as a destroyer. The homeopathic pharmacopoeia, which now includes over 3,000 remedies, can’t be patented, is easily manufactured, sold and used for an Avogadran fraction of what patent medicine can get capitalizing on the fear that nothing else but their patented crap can possibly stop your cancer or dire disease. So it’s quite understandable that what maddens the opponents of it is that homeopathy actually cures people of their ailments, something that their ”medicine” can’t claim.

Now before we get down and dirty in hand to hand combat in this war of lancets, allow me to wax a while profane . .

Certainly not homeopathy . . they say. But I say there wouldn’t be a mass health crisis of such magnitude if people, practitioner and patient, turned to homeopathy for the cure of ills. No, if homeopathy wa the common medicine of choice the disaster would be a financial one for the pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, a debacle the magnitude of which has not been seen since the Great Asteroid strike they say killed all the dinosaurs .  .

(Actually I think it was something else, but the putative myth provides an understandable allegory most everyone can enjoy)

You get my meaning . . don’t you?

The major complaint fed and fostered and carefully cultivated about homeopathy is that it is implausible. This of course is a myth, for what may be implausible in theory becomes a reality in practice. Most of this impotent ejaculating seems to come from people who can’t ignore the implausibility factor and are too scared (for fear of being proved wrong) to put it to the test. So what they say is that because it shouldn’t work, it doesn’t work, and this is what drives them into using the Luddite’s tongue of shouldn’t be.

Read here what some unidentified Australian barrister and professor of law recently wrote:

“Until such time as homoeopathy can scientifically justify its fundamental
tenets, which seems inconceivable by measures such as objective peer review,
double blind testing and proper replication of processes and outcomes, it
cannot be said that its claims for therapeutic efficacy can be justifiable.
This leaves the profession not just exposed to criticisms, such as were
enunciated in the cases referred to above, but potentially open to consumer
protection actions directed toward whether its representations are false,
misleading and deceptive, to civil litigation when its promises have not
been fulfilled, and especially when persons have died, and to criminal
actions in respect of the financial advantage that is obtained by its
practitioners from their representations.”

Okay, that’s enough. I’d regurgitate the rest of it for you here, but there’s no way for me to wake you up when you’re done reading it. Insomniacs can click on the link above.

Suffice it to say this kangaroo jurist goes on saying much the same thing, you can read it for yourself if you have an alarm clock, that’s what I used. But for the rest of you I must say, for a continent populated by descendants of a criminal class . . British bread stealers, pickpockets and debt slaves . . you’d think they’d be able to come up with better anti-homeopathy lawyers than this . . but then again he’s only a professor, those who can’t do teach  and doesn’t have to make his living actually putting his theory to the test.

Ring a bell?

NEXT: The case against the case against homeopathy.

Follow the John Benneth Journal on Twitter:

 Follow JBennethJournal on Twitter

PS: I put the names  of Ben Goldacre,  PZ Myers, Neil degrasse Tyson here because I think they should read this too. And I include the names of James Randi and  Edzard Ernst because I think they shouldn’t.

It would inflame them.

The clinical and pre-clinical proofs for homeopathy 2012

PROOFS FOR HOMEOPATHY

I wonder sometimes what would happen, and what the world would be like, if homeopathy was the medicine of first choice. It certainly wouldn’t flourish under the current requirements that it monetarily support a huge health care industry. Some of these billionaires woud have to go out and get jobs.

The focus of homeopathy is cure, not cash.

As you may already know ad nauseam, homeopathy works on the miminum dose, and presumably, following that doctrine, if this information herein alone was viewed by only 5% of the public, the results would be profound.

The following was inspired by a skeptic’s WordPress blog on homeopathy called “Skepticmind.”  It contains the usual misconceptions about homeopathy, and being that it’s been years now since the seminal article for this  blog “Proof for Homeopathy,” I felt compelled to add to it here tonight.

The major objection, or claim, by lame stream medicine is that homeopathy is simply a placebo, that it’s vehicles of water, sugar and alcohol are biologically inert and any clinical effects are imaginary, or due to false or erroneous reporting. Tests that show the action of homeopathics 0n both human and non human subjects are dismissed as being poorly conducted and of low quality.

However, a closer look at the literature that reports on the action on the materials in question tells a different story that can be disappointing if not disturbing to see how reactionary if not vicious the medical establishment can be when faced with a challenge to it.

It is often said that no test has ever shown homeopathy to work or be effective. But the fact is that there is more truth in the opposite. No major meta-analysis or review of the literature has ever been able to conclude that homeopathy is a placebo. Cucherat, which the author of ”Skeptic Mind” links to here, is no exception. The only meta that came close to being an exception was Shang, which stated that there was a weak effect, but that it was still equivalent to a placebo. Subsequent analysis however revealed that Shang had doctored the results . For a while the researchers refused to even reveal what studies they were reviewing. A closer look showed something completely different.  Statistical analysis of Shang’s data by Ludtke and Rutten revealed a significant effect.

And yet Shang remains the cornerstone for the case against homeopathy.

To read these studies online, add a dot before com before pasting into your address line.

BORNHOFT: Homeopathy in Healthcare  http://tinyurl.com/78fzhl2
FISHER: hi quality experiments yield positive results. http://www.tinyurl.com/7666q5g
JOHNSON: meta-analyses conclude homeopathic treatment significantly better than placebo http://www.tinyurl.com/7htoejq
SHANG>Ludtke Rutten: find significant effect beyond placebo http://www.tinyurl.com/ludtkerutten
LINDE: results incompatible with placebo hypothesis http://www.tinyurl.com/84xt56k
CUCHERAT homeopathy more effective than placebo http://www.tinyurl.com/cucherat
KLEIJNEN clinical trial evidence positive http://www.tinyurl.com/kleijnen
WITT The in vitro evidence for an effect of high homeopathic potencies—–A systematic review of the literature
(in vitro review) http://www.tinyurl.com/7n9sedq

It should be noted about Witt, that it reviews with criteria and weight 50 years of in vitro research showing the biochemical action of homeopathics.

These metas and reviews represent only a part of the growing research data base for homeopathy. The medical materials reference base alone is a rich source of clinical studies that spans observations by medical doctors over 200 years to present, as can be seen in the following materia medica

KENT http://www.tinyurl.com/jtkent
BOERICKE http://www.tinyurl.com/wmboericke

It is estimated that there are now over 400 of these “materia medica.”

Homeopathy is now being used in the nation’s top cancer hospital.

HOSPITAL USE of homeoapthy at the MD Anderson Cancer Clinic http://www.tinyurl.com/88phujd

International Journal of Oncology  Feb 2010  V.36, 2
Cytotoxic effects of ultra-diluted remedies on breast cancer cells
http://www.tinyurl.com/7n9939c

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 23: 975-982, 2003
Ruta 6 selectively induces cell death in brain cancer cells but proliferation in normal peripheral blood lymphocytes: A novel treatment for human brain cancer
http://www.tinyurl.com/6m2dpnd

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:879-885.
Homeopathic vs Conventional Treatment of Vertigo
A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Study
http://www.tinyurl.com/cb88aym

Integr Cancer Ther. 2006 Dec;5(4):343-9.
Can homeopathic treatment slow prostate cancer growth? Homeopathic remedies for the present study have no direct cellular anticancer effects but appear to significantly slow the progression of cancer and reduce cancer incidence and mortality in Copenhagen rats
http://www.tinyurl.com/7r7zajg

It’s been said there are no physical differences between potentized homeopathic remedies and their vehicles of water, sugar and alcohol. There are, however, a growing number of studies that contradict that notion.

HOMEOPATHY IN PHYSICS

ROY Structure http://www.tinyurl.com/7fap5m4
RAO Epitaxy   http://www.tinyurl.com/6nbl9jv
CHAPLIN Memory http://www.tinyurl.com/78445jp
ELIA Thermodynamics http://www.tinyurl.com/6w7t4bf
MONTAGNIER http://www.tinyurl.com/Montagnier
JOSEPHSON Molecular Memories http://www.tinyurl.com/bdjosephson
TILLER thermodynamics http://www.tinyurl.com/billtiller
CZERLINSKI http://www.tinyurl.com/Czerlinski

And this is merely a sampling of the online data base.  PubMed now lists over 4500 references to homeopathy.

I wonder how many people know there’s now a medical college devoted to training MD’s to use homeopathy in their pratices?

American Medical College of Homeopathy in Phoenix  http://tinyurl.com/ammedcol

Homeopathy is now a licensed practice in Arizona.

MASS TRIALS, EPIDEMICS

Summary of Cuban Experiences on Leptospirosis Prevention

http://homeopathyresource.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/summary-of-cuban-experiences-on-leptospirosis-prevention-from-the-authors/

BMC Public Health.

WITT: Homeopathic medical practice: long-term results of a cohort study with 3981 patients. Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, D-10098 Berlin, Germany http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16266440

BMC Public Health. 2008 Dec 17;8:413

How healthy are chronically ill patients after eight years of homeopathic treatment?–Results from a long term observational study.http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/8/413/abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19091085?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_PMC&linkpos=1&log$=citedinpmcarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed

Eur J Pediatr. 2007 May;166(5):509.

PEDIATRICS: Homeopathic treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial.

The anti-homeopathy crowd may crow how they win all the battles. They may go around telling all their friends it doesn’t work, and it’s just a placebo, but I think it’s safe to say they’ll’ never win the war. They’ve had two hundred year to do it, and their stupid arguments haven’t changed since then.

Mark Twain wrote about homeopathy in 1867. He said you can choose allopathy and die of an overdose, or you can choose homeopathy and die of an under.

Twain chose homeopathy and made exclusive use of medical doctors trained in the use of homeopathics, just like John D. Rockefeller, Mahatma Gandhi , the Queen, the British Royal family, and countless others have done. No doubt they will continue to do for many years to come. No matter how much ridicule, abuse and cyberbullying can be heaped on it, homeopathy will remain the wise woman’s and intelligent man’s curative medicine of choice.

John Benneth,PG Hom – London (Hons)

Follow the John Benneth Journal on Twitter:

 Follow JBennethJournal on Twitter

Please report dysfunctinal inks in the commentary section

Trayvon: ZIMMERMAN TO GO FREE!

. . FOR THE MONEY IN GUNS

by Jack Hammer

APRIL 2, 2011, Sanford, Florida

Murder not withstanding, the outcome of this case will be (and I said it in my last report and I will say it again) that Zimmerman will go free.

Even if he gets down on his knees an begs for it, the State of Florida will not prosecute George Zimmerman. To prosecute George Zimmerman the State of Florida will have to prosecute itself for obstructing justice. The State of Florida is not ruled by the people, it is ruled by the gun. To prosecute Zimmerman it would be shooting itself in the foot. It can’t do it. The State can’t prosecute the State.

We’ve already seen that in Florida, the bullet is more powerful than the ballot. In Florida, the only vote that means anything is the one cast by a gun.

“BUY A GUN NOW BEFORE OBAMA TAKES IT AWAY”

Unless new evidence surfaces, evidence that the State did not have in its possession before, it is even in less of a position to charge him with murder than it was before. The evidence of even greater importance accumulating here is that the people are no longer in control of their government. Government has slipped into the hands of inhuman money interests alone for government by the gun.

It is no longer a government of the people, by the people, for the people, it is a government of the money, by the money, for the money, and right now, the money is in guns.

Fox News, Mar. 29,’12: After the Trayon shooting “gun sales are exploding all across the country, so much so, gun makers are having trouble keeping up with demand.”

Why? According to ex-cop Bo Dietl:

“People are afraid Obama’s going to take their guns away.”

The murder of Trayvon Martin is a windfall for gun makers. Notice nothing is said about the “law” that puts every Floridian in the middle of High Noon, a sweating, trembling Gary Cooper . .

Get your guns, load up, it’s every man, woman and child for hisself.”

Even though his actions on that fateful night were pathological, and I use that word in all of its glorious meanings, what Zimmerman did before in other manifestations of this same perverted spirit were of the money. What Zimmerman did that night again, were by the money. What will be done in the days to come will continue to be done again, over and over again, not for Zimmerman, but for the money Zimmerman will bring to the gun industry.

The people can demand, putter and pout, but it won’t change a thing. Zimmerman will go free. That’s the way its going to be. He won’t even be charged.

But there wil be a common law bail, and that bail will be paid in blood.

Just wait and see. You’ve seen nothing yet.

Be there before it happens: Subscribe to The John Benneth Journal

(Subscribe button is in the upper right column of htis page)

and

Click on the blue button below to automatically follow the John Benneth Journal on Twitter:

Follow JBennethJournal on Twitter

ZIMMERMAN WALKS: Remote Viewing the Shooting of Trayvon Martin

by Jack Hammer

Audio analysts say it was Trayvon . .

It’s a truth, it’s a slang, a slander, it’s a lie.

Zimmerman will walk.

I wish I could say this without prejudice for or against Zimmerman. I wish I could say it in all due respect to everyone. I wish I could say it with great sorrow and sympathy for Trayvon Martin’s family, with no regard for my own preservation or agrandizement.

It doesn’t matter.

It wouldn’t change a thing.

I don’t mean to aggravate or accuse, it doesn’t matter. I don’t mean to distort or trivialize, the facts are the facts. I don’t mean to stick my nose in where it doesn’t belong, but I have a right to stand my ground, wherever I place my feet.

Isn’t that the law? In Florida, that is. And this is all happening in Florida, isn’t it?

No, it’s happening everywhere. Coming to a street corner near you.

Now in Seminole county, they‘re not going to send the judge‘s kid to a Florida hellhole where he‘ll be raped, tortured and burned for killing a black kid.

It isn‘t going to happen.

I predict that the Florida court will not convict George Zimmerman of murder. It is already a known fact that legal scholars and purveyors of public opinion agree with me on this, and they call me and ask me, “Jack, what am I going to tell my listeners?”
“Oh Jack, what should I say to my viewing audience?”,
“Please tell me Jack, what should I write today about the Trayvon Martin case?”

I tell them, listen to me.

The media is like a grazing herd. Sure they’ll stampede on a whistle, yes it is true, but they will ever so cautiously move on anything new or that which may be wrongly construed y the those beyond the front loges, they must first rely on the explorations by taste testers . . like myself.

I posted many days ago that George Zimmerman had a history of violence. Now I finally read today AOL news is reporting this same worn out old news, evident from the beginning of this case to any who weren’t buying what the penny pinchers and the gun pointers were peddling.

Within moments of viewing the scattered evidence it was obvious. Zimmerman was a delusional wannabe lawman, a Batman, hunting down fairytale lawbreakers with a 9mm pistol in his hand. He wasn’t following Trayvon to ask him for the time. He wasn’t following Trayvon to get directions. No, he was following Trayvon to do what he did, it was the outcome he dreamed of, that’s who he is.

I have remote viewed this scene. Zimmerman is cruising in his SUV junker. He see Trayvon anbegins to follow him. He parks the car. Trayon is wlaking quikly. Geroge has to trot to cath up. He touches the gun to reassure himself. He omes up behind Trayon.  Trayvon turns around and asks “Why are you following me?”

Zimmerman responds, “What are you doing here?”

Trayvon isbacking up. He says, “Have you got a problem?”

Zimmerman says, “No . .”

Trayvon turns to go, to continue walking.

Zimmerman yells, “No!” loudly, several times. Trayon won’t stop. Zimmerman pulls his gun. He grabs Trayvon’s arm. Trayvon sees the gun, screams “Help!” swings at Zimmerman and the gun goes off, the bullet hitting Trayvon in the chest. Trayvon spins around and falls down face first. Zimmerman moves forwards, bends down and puts  his hands on Trayvon’s back.

Tableau.

It doesn’t matter. Zimmerman will walk. Too bad! Under Bush Law, with his daddy’s “Get Out of Jail Free” card, with the shadow of hat man behind him, the states Attorney, ALEC, the arms dealers . . George Zimmerman walks.

TRAYVON: George Zimmerman had a history of violence

There’s got to be a reason the Sanford, Florida police have been acting so strangely in the Trayvon Martin case: I think they’re about to be hit with a charge of gross malfeasance in the shooting death of Trayvon and they know it. And the shooter has them over a barrel.

George Zimmerman, the shooter, it appears has a get out of jail card from the somebody or something in system for years now.  He’s got a record of violence that would normally have prevented him from having a concealed weapon permit.

Get this: Zimmerman was arrested in 2005 in  Orange County for resisting arrest with violence and battery on a law enforcement officer.

RESISTING ARREST WITH VIOLENCE AND BATTTERY?

They got to be kidding. But that’s what it says. This guy was arrested seven years ago for a violence on a cop and he’s walking around today with a gun in his hand?

Even Florida governor Jeb Bush said he doesn’t get it: A couple days ago he said of the case, ”The lack of arrest doesn’t make sense to me.”

But wait, there’s more. Previous to attacking a cop, Zimmerman was also accused of domestic violence. In 2005 his fiancee’, beautician Veronica Zuazo,  reported that Zimmerman had been physically violent with her on more than one occassion. SHetoo out a restraining orer on him. That would be enough to get most guys thrown in the slammer and their ticket to caarry yanked, no matter what she did to him in return. And guess what? In that same situation Zimmerman also took the victim stance as he did in the Trayvor’s  shooting, claiming she had attacked him.

He said she slapped, clawed and tried to choke him. Her chihauhua bit him in the face. She went after him with a baseball bat. Sound familiar?

She said he popped her in the mouth, more than once.

Florida requires a history of violence report for carry permit that would have included a violent brush with the cops.

A domestic violence charge is all it takes for the law for the cops to demand surrender of your guns. Did Zimmerman have a concealed weapons permit in 2005, and if he did, was he required to turn in his pistol and any other guns he had? Or did he get yet another pass on that one to go alonside his get out of jail free card.

Then there’s the concealed weapons permit questionnaire. Did Zimmerman fill one of these out? Here’s someot0 hte questions:

“Have you had adjudication of guilt withheld on any felony?” That could be a yes. I presume attacking a cop is a felony. But conviction was withheld when he entered a pretrial diversion program.

“Have you received a suspended sentence on any felony?” That could also be a yes.

Why isn’t anyone demanding that Zimmerman turn over his guns?

I smell dirty cops. There’s something strange going on here that the cops know and we don’t, something that keeps them from doing to him what they’d fall all over themselves to do to any one of us, something enough to make even the Sanford chief of police back down. Zimmerman’s got them over barrel with something or someone.

And now he’s on the run, armed and dangerous, and the cops are doing nothing about it.

Why? They got al they need to bring this guy in.

Watch out. My guess is he’ll use that 9mm again if he isn’t stopped.

Follow the John Benneth Journal on Twitter:

Follow JBennethJournal on Twitter