<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The John Benneth Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>johnbenneth.wordpress.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:08:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='johnbenneth.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

			<item>
		<title>QUANTUM PSYCHIATRY: A Prologue</title>
		<link>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/quantum-psychiatry-a-prologue/</link>
		<comments>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/quantum-psychiatry-a-prologue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnbenneth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum psychiatry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new materia medica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropomorphic field transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronoeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aurum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goldfish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[argentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirror remedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john benneth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edgar allan poe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cask of amontillado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montresor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Chappell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Bailey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Morrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Vithoulkas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Ullman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Fisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Griffith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berlin Wall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/quantum-psychiatry-a-prologue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well here&#8217;s a toddy ta dee ta: I&#8217;ve decided to become the first student so named of quantum psychiatry. And by way of it something of a practitioner.
Ah, I can hear the breathless words now:
&#8220;Montresor, Montresor, what is this I here about quantum psychiatry?&#8221;
I kept to my studies, did not look up, to finish the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=johnbenneth.wordpress.com&blog=516268&post=11&subd=johnbenneth&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p>Well here&#8217;s a toddy ta dee ta: I&#8217;ve decided to become the first student so named of quantum psychiatry. And by way of it something of a practitioner.</p>
<p>Ah, I can hear the breathless words now:<br />
&#8220;Montresor, Montresor, what is this I here about quantum psychiatry?&#8221;</p>
<p>I kept to my studies, did not look up, to finish the sentence I was penning.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh,&#8221; he said, &#8220;the Amontillado was better quaffed than what you vouched safe for, but after spending such a long time behind the wall you masonried me in for . . as a joke, yes Montresor? well, I must say, I went a little bug-ga-da, and have NOT been the same since.&#8221;</p>
<p>I did not look up, but as I kept to my writing, I threw him small boon, to let him know I was listening: &#8220;What took you so long?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;What took me so long?&#8221; he said, like a distant echo from a far off land. &#8220;Well, I had to dig my way out with a folding knife, just in time to learn that you have proved homeopathy . . and now this!  Yes, yes, I think I could use the benefit of . . what is it they say? Quantum psychiatry? Oh but la, please do tell, Montresor, please please! I must know more.&#8221;</p>
<p>There was a breathless moment as I carefully placed my quill in its golden quiver, and pushed my reminisces aside; pinched the bridge of my nose, digging thumb tip and forefinger into the nasal corners of my eyes, then lifting my brow in mock surprise, opened them wide to stretch them, and turned my head, and peered over my spectacles at the once fat jolly chuff, now an poorly animated emaciation, who had been pleading into my left ear, (a bit deaf) and tugging at my jerkin.<br />
&#8220;Fortunato,&#8221; I cried, my fist coming down on the arm of the chair &#8220;you dug yourself out with your folding knife? Didn&#8217;t you find the door at the southern end of the Immurement?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Door?&#8221; he said, befuddled. &#8220;Door? What door?&#8221; He pronounced it achingly and sat inn the companion chair at the sside of my rolltop. &#8220;Oh no,&#8221; he said, clasping his head with both hands.<br />
&#8220;Yes,&#8221; I said, &#8220;it leads directly to the kitchen, where I left you a glass of cold milk and a roast beef sandwiche!&#8221;</p>
<p>He hung his head and cried. Actually the milk had been tepid and sour, and the sandwich nothing but hot mustard on stale bread, but it&#8217;s the thought that counts.<br />
&#8220;Oh well,&#8221; I said, &#8220;at least you found the chains soft enough. Eh?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh but Montresor,&#8221; he said, renewing his pleas, &#8220;tell me of the quantum psychiatry! What is it, how does it work?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well,&#8221; I said, getting comfy again. &#8220;It&#8217;s a bit of alchemy. The use of succussed high dilutes, as used in homeopathy, to affect human behavior. For the good of Mankind, of course.&#8221;<br />
I smiled at hnim and nodded. He looked back at me in astonishment, as if I was some kind of wizard.</p>
<p>&#8220;Now,&#8221; I said, not knowing what else to say, &#8220;how might I help you, Fortunato? Why shouldn&#8217;t you be my first victim . . I mean client? Client!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I seem to be suffering from clausterphobia,&#8221; he said, as if taking inventory. Then he rememmbered what happened</p>
<p>&#8220;All the doctors,&#8221; he said, &#8220;all they want to do is get me hooked on their patented petro chemical synthesis, palliate my symptoms and line their pockets with my ducats!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well,&#8221; I said, &#8220;we can&#8217;t blame them for that, now can we Fortunato? They only do what they know how to do and express their ignorance, and one certainly can understand their need to make a living at it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I rose from my chair and took him by the hand to a couch, sat him down, and with with my hand made an application of bioenergetic Anthropomorphic Field Transmission (AFT) and a few mesmeric passes, quieted him enough for him to lie back and enter into a trance.</p>
<p>&#8220;Allow me to enter your mind,&#8221; I said. &#8221;Let us walk together down an imaginary path. Springtime. What do you notice? A flower, a bird? Where are?</p>
<p>&#8220;The Chateau!&#8221; he said happily. &#8220;In the garden. Oh a beautfiul day.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;See the beautiful little blue flowers flower?&#8221; I said.</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes, yes . .&#8221; he said eagerly.</p>
<p>&#8220;Monkshood! Don&#8217;t touch them!&#8221; I said. &#8220;Most poisonous.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh my,&#8221; he rejected. &#8220;I don&#8217;t suppose . . hmm, once when I was a child I became very sick afterneating a blue flower . . Montresor!&#8221;</p>
<p>He sat up, gripping himself, and said: &#8220;Montresor, do you suppose . . &#8220;</p>
<p>&#8220;Relax, my friend, lay back down,&#8221; I said. He did I  commanded. &#8221;L:et us return to where we were before. The garden at the Chateau. What is that long thing lying on the ground?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I see a beautiful walking stick,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I must have it . .&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;No!&#8221; I said. &#8220;It is a snake! Crotalus horridus, the timber rattler. Do you hear its shaker, like maracas?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Maracas! Oh dear me, I rememeber now, I was bit once by a snake while in the Americas!&#8221; he said. I made a note under loquaciousness.</p>
<p>&#8220;Montressor,&#8221; he said, sitting up once again, holding himself and staring at me. &#8220;You are amazing! How did you know?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Now, now, dear Fortunato,&#8221; I said, &#8220;Unhand yourself. Lay yourself back back down. . . there, there, good now. Close your eyes. Now  tell me of your anamnesia . .&#8221;</p>
<p>He opened an eye. &#8220;My what?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Your anamnesia,&#8221; I said, &#8220;the past life remembered . .&#8221;</p>
<p>Both his eyes widened and glazed over: &#8220;The past life remembered . . I . .I . .&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Your traumas, Fortunato,&#8221; I said. &#8220;The things that have hurt you, physical, emotional, mental, your fears, your life, Fortunato, your life . . &#8220;</p>
<p>&#8220;My life,&#8221; he mumbled, and sputtered, then like a gathering storm, spoke of the recent immurement, then of the unintended insults he had born all of his life, and the intended ones, too, the betrayals, the robberies, the beatings, and another (one I hadn&#8217;t heard about) immurement; and a duel; drunkeness; a disease contracted at a bawdy house; a jab from a physicians needle that left him feeling poorly ever since; the separation of his parents; a particularly unjust spanking; a near drowning; his <em>first</em> immurement (good God) and a difficult birth. I made another application of AFT and it set in and began to do its work: in a deeper trance he recounted trauma experienced while in the womb! His father&#8217;s misgivings at being a dad; his mother&#8217;s fright . . and then traumas from previous lives!</p>
<p>When I awoke he was snoring peacefully. I looked at my watch.</p>
<p>Late!</p>
<p>I jumped up and shook him awake. &#8220;Fortunato, Fortunato, your time is up!&#8221; I said.</p>
<p>&#8220;Wha? What?&#8221; he said, trying to sit up, rubbing his eyes.</p>
<p>&#8220;How much do I owe you?&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ll send you my bill, &#8221; I said. &#8220;I must first go over my notes, and then when I am ready, I will determine which remedies you need from the chemist, and prepare a schedule for their taking.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, very well, &#8221; he said drowsily as he toddled to the door.</p>
<p>I helped him out into the street where his carriage was waiting.</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t worry, Montresor, &#8221; I said, &#8220;the chancre will soon leave you and the dementia will clear up.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;All that?&#8221; he said as the dirver snapped his whip and the carriage lurched forward, throwing him back.</p>
<p>&#8220;All that, and more,&#8221; I said, yelling after him waving at the empty street.</p>
<p>I quickly turned and hurried back in to pour over my notes, refresing myself with the secret recording I had made of his answers, furiously scribbling notes, diving into repertories, examining keynotes, paging through materia medicas.<br />
I found Kent most helpful, and Boericke and Tafel most often in concordance, filling in where Kent stumbles.</p>
<p>Then Chappell, and Bailey, Morrison of course, and I&#8217;d be nowhere without Griffith&#8217;s new Materia Medica.</p>
<p>Goldfish . . hmm. Black obsidian, Chalice Well. <em>Berlin Wall.</em></p>
<p>Thymus gland! Ah yes! And Amethyst!</p>
<p>Then suddenly, it was done, my first nude, the masterwork with all its rights of of primogeniture, my first born.</p>
<p>And speaking of cardinals, first, of course, I had to coisder where in the week to start in with the chronoeopathy, and when. Do I risk it first in treatment, last or during?</p>
<p>Do we begin on Sunday with Aurum, or end on Sunday, and with what potency? Is Sunday the first day of the week? No! Begin on Monday,the day of relection, with Argentum and Silica, the Mirror Remedy. Let Fortunato see himself as he is . . intersperse the routine with the individulized, his birth remedies, his constitutionals, miasms, chronics and acutes, and the anamnesis, marching toward the Golden Hour, on the Day of Perfection . .  YES! The Grand Finale!</p>
<p>My course was clear. On Monday I would administer the Mirror Remedy with Q potencies . . start with the brain, the organ of the mind! . . I must take copious notes . .  and usher in a New Age of medicine! to that end, finally, as it inevitably must come, with medica sine materia, ultimtely non material medicine, the healer who works with his mind alone !</p>
  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/11/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/11/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/11/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/11/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/11/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/11/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/11/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/11/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/11/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/11/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=johnbenneth.wordpress.com&blog=516268&post=11&subd=johnbenneth&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/quantum-psychiatry-a-prologue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/ce11c70a8da714478535208952d0eaed?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">johnbenneth</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Science of Homeopathy Website: scienceofhomeopathy.com</title>
		<link>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/new-science-of-homeopathy-website-scienceofhomeopathy-com/</link>
		<comments>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/new-science-of-homeopathy-website-scienceofhomeopathy-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnbenneth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/new-science-of-homeopathy-website-scienceofhomeopathy-com/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve submitted anything here for an updoozal, so I&#8217;d like to first thank everyone who has supported me with their readership, and special kudos tothose who have deemed to grace my little blog with a comment, and that includes even the scoffers, because they keep me diving back into the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=johnbenneth.wordpress.com&blog=516268&post=10&subd=johnbenneth&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p>It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve submitted anything here for an updoozal, so I&#8217;d like to first thank everyone who has supported me with their readership, and special kudos tothose who have deemed to grace my little blog with a comment, and that includes even the scoffers, because they keep me diving back into the literature to meet their objections; but I&#8217;d like to especially thank Dr. Sharma at the Hahnemann College in London for his invitation to me to speak on the science of homeopathy at the upcoming World Homeopathic Congress in London this coming April. I&#8217;m saving my allowance and I certainly look forward to it and hope I can make a reasonable showing in a clean suit, at least.<br />
But the most important part is that it was such an inspiration to me that I have hoisted a new website, scienceofhomeopathy.com, dedicated to the subject as stated, which means featuring the work of so many people in bringing this wonderful science to fruition with clinical, physical, in vitro, and in vivo studies that prove the efficacy of it. I hope that anyone who has any questions about homeopathy will give it a looksee.<br />
love to all,<br />
John</p>
  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/10/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/10/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/10/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/10/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/10/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/10/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/10/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/10/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/10/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/10/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=johnbenneth.wordpress.com&blog=516268&post=10&subd=johnbenneth&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/new-science-of-homeopathy-website-scienceofhomeopathy-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/ce11c70a8da714478535208952d0eaed?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">johnbenneth</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Skeptic Challenge</title>
		<link>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2007/07/16/the-skeptic-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2007/07/16/the-skeptic-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 04:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnbenneth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2007/07/16/the-skeptic-challenge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Prologue- I&#8217;ve made the Skeptic Challenge as a response to the Psychic Challenge. I trust you&#8217;ll see its failings.The following is a transcript of &#8220;The Skeptic Challenge&#8221; video on Youtube, with additional annotations.  Commentary is being edited for publication in a future blog to follow. 
INTRODUCTION
My name is John Benneth and I will pay one thousand dollars to any person who can [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=johnbenneth.wordpress.com&blog=516268&post=9&subd=johnbenneth&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><span class="Style1"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14pt;"></span></span></p>
<p><span class="Style1"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14pt;"><font face="Times New Roman"><span class="style1"><span style="font-size:14pt;">Prologue- I&#8217;ve made the Skeptic Challenge as a response to the Psychic Challenge. I trust you&#8217;ll see its failings.</span></span><span class="style1"><span><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"></span><font size="3"><span><span>The following is a transcript of &#8220;The Skeptic Challenge&#8221; video on Youtube, </span></span><span><span>with additional annotations.</span></span></font></span></span>  Commentary is being edited for publication in a future blog to follow.</font></span></span><span class="Style1"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14pt;"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span></p>
<p><span class="Style1"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14pt;"><font face="Times New Roman"><span class="Style1"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14pt;"><font face="Times New Roman"><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></font></span></span></font></span></span></p>
<p><span class="Style1"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14pt;"><font face="Times New Roman"><span class="Style1"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">My name is John Benneth and I will pay one thousand dollars to any person who can demonstrate, under conditions similar to James “the Amazing” Randi’s Psychic Challenge, that the Psychic Challenge is a valid offer for proof of psychic powers, the paranormal, the supernatural, homeopathy or anything else but Mr. Randi’s own illusions. </font></span></span><span class="Style1"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">Such demonstration must take place under the following rules and limitations which are in essence identical to those of the Psychic Challenge. Applicants or anyone offering proof must agree, that in believing that the Psychic Challenge is the quintessential acid test for claims of the paranormal, they must also believe that their own claims can withstand reciprocity and be tested by the same rules, conditions, limitations demands of the Psychic Challenge, and that this, The Skeptic Challenge, is the quintessential acid test of atheism. </font></span></span></font></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><span class="Style1"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">If you hold the Psychic Challenge out to be a common standard for judging the paranormal, then you must agree then that the conditions are universal, logical and held in common, in the public domain, without copyright, not patentable or proprietary, like the code duello, to be used by anyone and everyone when examining an unusual claim or answering a challenge. It is understood then, that in responding to this, the Skeptic challenge, you believe the terms for the Psychic Challenge, which you are seeking to validate, derive from common logic and are definitive of the best known method’s by which to determine the truth of a claim. Therefore, you must believe that similar rules and limitations must apply in establishing the truth of any claim, including those made by the Psychic Challenge itself,<span>  </span>herein that Mr. Randi has one million dollars to award for evidence of those things he challenges.</font></span></span></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Put plainly and simply, I, John Benneth and one thousand dollars say that Mr. Randi does not have one million dollars for proof of claims of the paranormal or anything else but his own illusions.</font><font face="Times New Roman">Listen carefully to what I have to say, and if you possess an open, clear and objective mind, by the end of this video you too will agree with me and millions of others that the Psychic Challenge is a hoax. <span> </span><span> </span></font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Once again, although the award is smaller, and the challenge is made by me, except for slight changes in wording where needed to maintain the relevance of the charge, the rules for the Skeptic Challenge are the same as they are for the Psychic Challenge.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman"><span class="Style1"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14pt;"><font face="Times New Roman"><span class="Style1"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14pt;"><font face="Times New Roman"><strong>THE RULES:</strong> </font></span></span></font></span></span></font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Rule Number One: According to Randi this is the first and the most important of the limitations, conditions and rules for establishing a claim. The prospective applicant, hereafter referred to as you, and I must agree, what constitutes proof for the validity of the Psychic Challenge, the limits of the proposed demonstration (so far as time, location and other variables are concerned) and what will constitute both a positive and a negative result.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Rule # 2 I will only accept an actual agreed upon performance of proof. Anecdotal accounts will not be accepted or considered to be potential proof.<span>  </span>Unless they can show qualified and independent disposition of funds, records such as bank statements will not be accepted or even considered.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Rule #3 I will consult competent counsel when expert evaluation of the claim is required. I have no interest in theories or explanations of what constitutes validity for the Psychic Challenge; if you attempt to provide me with that kind of garbage, it will be denied, dismissed and thrown away.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Rule #4 You as a prospective applicant must agree that photographs, recorded, or written, <span> </span>and material collected as a result of contact with me about the Skeptic Challenge, the application and records of inquiries belong to me and may be used by me for my pleasure unless otherwise agreed upon and stipulated.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Rule #5 After an agreement is reached/ on what constitutes proof, no part of it can be changed in any way without agreement by John Benneth – in writing. </font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Rule #6 If you are too far away or I don’t have the time, you will be required to reveal your evidence in a location that can be attended by my representative. This preliminary investigation is to determine if you are likely to have the proof needed<span>  </span>to perform as promised, using our agreed protocol. To date, no applicant has passed this preliminary investigation, and this has eliminated the need for a formal investigation. There is no limit on the number of times you may re-apply, but re-application can take place only after a year has passed since the completion of the preliminary investigation.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Rule #7 Your expenses such as transportation, accommodation, materials, assistants, and/or all other costs for any persons or procedures incurred in pursuit of the reward, are the sole responsibility of you the applicant. I will not bear any of the costs.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">#8 When entering into this challenge, <em>as far as this may be done by established legal statutes,</em> in applying for the Skeptic Challenge you must surrender any and all rights to legal action against me, and/or against any persons peripherally involved. This applies to injury, accident, physical damage, emotional suffering, financial loss, professional loss, or damage of any kind. However, this rule in no way affects the awarding of the prize, once it is properly won in accord with the agreed upon protocol. </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">#9 At the formal investigation, in advance, an independent person will be placed in charge of a personal check from John Benneth for one percent of the award, same as in the Psychic Challenge. In this case that would be ten whole dollars.  In the event that the claimant is successful under the agreed-upon terms and conditions, that check shall be immediately surrendered to the claimant, and within ten days, I will pay to the claimant the remainder of the reward, for a total of $1,000. One thousand dollars in cash is held at this time in the form of a personal check made out by me as assurance of the prize funds. Validation of this money and its current status may be obtained by contacting John Benneth through Bandershot on Youtube or this website, johnbenneth.wordpress.com.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">A note by me here. I have seen what is claimed to be a bank statement that is offered as proof of the Psychic Challenge. After Randi qualified me as an applicant I called Goldman Sachs, the investment firm touted as holding the account, and I talked to Naomi Shapiro, who Randi claimed was the account manager for the Psychic Challenge. Ms Shapiro could not me tell anything about it, much less validate it. It was soon after that that Mr. Randi complained that Goldman Sachs’s attorney called him and ordered him to stop using their name on his website. Randi’s evidence of proof of the Psychic Challenges is currently NOT on Randi’s website, but on a website that features magic tricks.<span>  </span>The validity he claims is now relegated to a small dark corner of the Internet, on a website entitled &#8220;magicandillusion.com.&#8221;<span>  </span>So please don’t bother offering a bank statement from Goldman Sachs or an invitation to call Naomi Shapiro as proof. It’s already been checked out and found to be false. The psychic challenge is just an illusion constructed by a failed magician who has a long history of miscalculating his tricks and becoming victimized by them. After spending his early years in a body cast, he has had to be rescued from the outside after being locked in a safe, let out of jail or handcuffs. The Psychic Challenge is not the first time one his illusions has turned on him, having had to be saved from drowning, suffocation, a noose and burning, cut out of a straight jacket &amp; untied from a tree.<br />
<span>#10: </span>Copies of the Skeptic Challenge application are available free of charge to any qualified person who requests it, or it can be downloaded from the Internet, at Bandershot.com or my blog johnbenneth dot wordpress dot com.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"># 11: This offer is made by me on the behalf of NO other person or organization. Although others may become involved in the examination of your claim and may add their reward money to the total offered, I, John Benneth will manage the challenge. As in the Psychic Chlalenge I will not entertain any demand that the thousand dollars be deposited in escrow, displayed in cash, or otherwise produced in advance of the test being performed.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"><em>I love this next one. This is what Randi requires, so by terms of the Psychic Challenge, it must be the standard of truth. Whereas Randi inistss on an &#8220;academic&#8221;, since the Skeptic Challenge is in essence a challenge of atheism, I have replaced the witnessing of special powers by an &#8220;academic&#8221;  with the witnessing of a skeptic&#8217;s special powers of validation by a Christian Science practitioner.</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Rule #12: This offer is NOT open to just anyone. Before being considered as an applicant, you must satisfy two conditions. First, you must have a “media presence,” which means you have been published, written about, or are known to the media in regard to your claimed abilities or powers to validate the Psychic Challenge. You can established this by producing articles, videos, books, or other published material that specifically addresses your claim. Second, you must produce at least one signed document from a Christian Science practitioner who has witnessed, predicted or divined your power or ability of Psychic Challenge validation.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">#13: National origin, gender, age, race, and educational background are not factors for acceptance.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">#14: This prize will continue to be offered until it is awarded or until the Psychic Challenge dies. Should the Psychic Challenge still be offered and the Skeptic Challenge remain uncollected at the time of my death , the administration of the prize will pass into other hands, and it is intended that it continue with the full force of my mandate as if I was GOVERNING FROM THE GRAVE. I added that. This next part, rule #15, Randi puts in all caps, so I will too and use fewer words.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Rule #15: YOU MUST AGREE WITH ME WHAT WILL DEMONSTRATE PROOF FOR<em> THE PSYCHIC CHALLENGE</em>.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">#16: A notarized form found at Bandershot.com or on my blog at johnbenneth.wordpress.com must be accompanied by a brief, two-paragraph description of your demonstration. Upon a protocol being developed, that description may be extended. <span> </span>(pause)</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Please do not burden me with theories, philosophical observations, jokes, insults, previous examples, anecdotal evidence or other comments. I am only interested in an actual demonstration of proof for the Psychic Challenge. Oh yes.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman"><span>An additional note here: </span>There will be no special rules, exceptions, conditions, standards, or favors granted to you without my consent in advance. If you refuse to agree to meet the rules as outlined here, you will not be considered here to have ever been an applicant. Complete agreement with these rules will be the ONLY way for you to graduate from &#8220;applicant&#8221; to &#8220;claimant.&#8221;</font><font face="Times New Roman">By signing, notarizing and submitting the printed form, you signify agreement with all of the above rules. Be advised that you should conduct proper and secure tests of your own to determine whether your abilities or claims are actually valid.</font><font face="Times New Roman">This application will be signed by John Benneth and returned to the applicant by mail after a test protocol has been mutually agreed upon, and a test date and location have been determined.<br />
IMPORTANT: Only claims that can be verified by evidence under proper observing conditions will be accepted. Also, John Benneth will NOT accept claims of anonymous donors such as &#8221;Richard Adams, III,&#8221; the existence of bank accounts or negotiable bonds in Randi’s name at Goldman Sachs, the validity of Naomi Shapiro, unilateral conditions, Atheism, debunking, ghostbusting, MacArthur Genius awards, causing disbelief in God, peer review, or the gold standard of science as proof that James “the Amazing” Randi has a million dollars for proof<span>  </span>of the paranormal. </font><font face="Times New Roman">John Benneth will also NOT accept evidence that is likely to cause injury of any sort to Randi or anyone else, such as web pages, temper tantrums, withholding of air, food or water, or the use of illicit materials, drugs, or dangerous devices, or evidence that is meant to insult, defame, discredit or intimidate.</font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">Write to me with your preliminary evidence at Bandershot on Youtube.com, and if it passes as having potential validity, I will send you a mailing address to which you can send your application form.</font><font face="Times New Roman">Once again, the conditions for this, the Skeptic Challenge, mimic and mock the conditions, terms, rules and limitations held forth in the Psychic Challenge. Compare them and you will see that<em> there is no substantial difference</em>.</font><font face="Times New Roman">If you once believed the Psychic Challenge to be the gold standard for questioning the paranormal, then the Skeptic Challenge must now be the gold standard for testing Atheism. Are not the words psychic, paranormal and supernatural merely secular terms for Man’s spiritual abilities? Does anyone but an atheist not belive that God is the greatest paranormalist of them all? </font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">All potential applicants to the Skeptic Challenge must have watched the Youtube video. Thank you for watching and good luck.</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Copyright John Benneth, 2007</font></p>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/9/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/9/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/9/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/9/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/9/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/9/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/9/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/9/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/9/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/9/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/9/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/9/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=johnbenneth.wordpress.com&blog=516268&post=9&subd=johnbenneth&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2007/07/16/the-skeptic-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/ce11c70a8da714478535208952d0eaed?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">johnbenneth</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush/Cheney Out, Pelosi/Reid In.</title>
		<link>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2006/12/10/bushcheney-out-pelosireid-in/</link>
		<comments>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2006/12/10/bushcheney-out-pelosireid-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 07:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnbenneth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2006/12/10/bushcheney-out-pelosireid-in/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stop the murder. End the killing. Do the right thing. I&#8217;m sorry to say it, but Bush and Cheney have to now be impeached and charged with crimes against humanity. Why? Well, because it is the only way the world&#8217;s going to trust the U.S. government again. Yeah, I know, it&#8217;s a drag and would be traumatic [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=johnbenneth.wordpress.com&blog=516268&post=7&subd=johnbenneth&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p>Stop the murder. End the killing. Do the right thing. I&#8217;m sorry to say it, but Bush and Cheney have to now be impeached and charged with crimes against humanity. Why? Well, because it is the only way the world&#8217;s going to trust the U.S. government again. Yeah, I know, it&#8217;s a drag and would be traumatic and embarassing for everyone involved, but this is the only way I know to suggest so as the world knows that Americans are serious about doing the right thing again.</p>
<p>George and Dick wouldn&#8217;t really mind. Deep down inside they want to do the right thing too. And right now, by simply going along with the program, this is the best contribution they can make. And if they don&#8217;t fight it, why shouldn&#8217;t we be forgiving? Let the healing start at the top, from the inside out, from the highest command and most important offices to the lowest and the least, from the last occurence of crime to the first. Everything gets settled and the meek get their birthright.</p>
<p>Makes a lot of sense and carries with it the wisdom of the ages.</p>
<p>And speaking of again, how about if Americans start acting like human beings . . . again? Good idea. Remember what that was like? Remember when Americans were the good guys? Remember how good it felt? Everybody loving everybody else?</p>
<p>The Benneth plan is then, after Geroge and Dick are safely behind bars, under the leadership of President Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Harry Reid, for the U.S. to pull back over the horizon, turn the stinking mess over to the U.N. and start paying reparations and making friends again with world.</p>
<p>So mote it be. What else really is there to do?</p>
<p>How about a real energy policy with hydrogen hi-ways, bio-fuels, solar, wind and geo power? How about a public works program, a return to the Moon, a trip to Mars? How about a national health plan? How about working on ways so as Americans can feel safe in their homes and communities again? How about better education? How about finding safe and productive ways to empty the prisons of non-violent offenders? How about rebuilding the economy and the middle class?</p>
<p>See? Look at all the challenging, fun and productive things there are for Americans to do within their lifetimes, much more worthwhile than killing and maiming people and blowing things up on the other side of the Earth.</p>
<p>Americans, come together and say it together: &#8220;Let&#8217;s leave a legacy. Give peace a chance. Let&#8217;s show the world that we can recognize a mistake and correct it quickly. Let&#8217;s show them we&#8217;re still the greatest country on Earth . . . or at least within the top ten or twenty.&#8221;</p>
<p> Okay? Really, all it takes on your part as an American is a simple change of mind if you&#8217;re in disagreement, having the courage to admit you were duped. You were doing the best you could with the information you had. Nobody can blame you in the end. You were scared. But now you know the truth, and now you can do the right thing, by letting these words sharpen your focus  or just by changing your mind.</p>
<p>Hey, maybe if we stop being so materialistic, blaming, hurting and killing each other,  and learn to share, we can all come out winners . . . again!</p>
<p>God bless you all,</p>
<p>your friend, your best friend, your only friend, </p>
<p>John Benneth</p>
<p>PS: Don&#8217;t send money, just send love!</p>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/7/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/7/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/7/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/7/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/7/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/7/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/7/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/7/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/7/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/7/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/7/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/7/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=johnbenneth.wordpress.com&blog=516268&post=7&subd=johnbenneth&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2006/12/10/bushcheney-out-pelosireid-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/ce11c70a8da714478535208952d0eaed?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">johnbenneth</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE CURSE OF HAMMURABI</title>
		<link>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2006/11/06/saddams-jury/</link>
		<comments>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2006/11/06/saddams-jury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnbenneth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2006/11/06/saddams-jury/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
THE CURSE OF HAMMURABI 
 
The Hanging of Saddam Hussein 
and 
Anglo-American Influence on the Rule of Law in Iraq
by John Benneth
The following 3800 year old inscription, called The Code of Hammurabi was found on a stone monument  originally from Iraq. I&#8217;ve edited it for comprehension and brevity. In addition to a preface, epilogue and the following warning, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=johnbenneth.wordpress.com&blog=516268&post=5&subd=johnbenneth&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong>THE CURSE OF HAMMURABI</strong></span> </strong></span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong><img align="middle" width="319" src="http://www.aoc.gov/images/hammurabi.jpg" alt="Hammuraabi" height="400" style="width:319px;height:400px;" /> </strong></span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong>The Hanging of Saddam Hussein </strong></span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong>and </strong></span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong>Anglo-American Influence on </strong></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong>the Rule of Law in Iraq</strong></span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><span style="font-family:Georgia;">by John Benneth</span></span></p>
<p align="left"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iraq/images/saddam-card.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iraq/saddam-pics.htm&amp;h=250&amp;w=179&amp;sz=9&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=vPkZP1FDFWJXbcpFaqxJvw&amp;start=29&amp;tbnid=eUwsLsO2L6i6fM:&amp;tbnh=111&amp;tbnw=79&amp;ei=KZR7Rby-Jc7QJMbeueML&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsaddam%2Bhussein%26start%3D18%26ndsp%3D18%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN"><img align="left" width="79" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:eUwsLsO2L6i6fM:http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iraq/images/saddam-card.jpg" height="111" style="width:79px;height:111px;border:1px solid;" /></a>The following 3800 year old inscription, called <em>The Code of Hammurabi</em> was found on a stone monument <a href="fnShowZoom('11081316','FD001340')"><img border="0" vspace="10" align="right" width="144" src="http://untruenews.com/unimages/saddam_hussein.jpg" hspace="3" alt="Portrait of Saddam Hussein" height="213" style="width:144px;height:213px;" /></a> originally from Iraq. I&#8217;ve edited it for comprehension and brevity. In addition to a preface, epilogue and the following warning, or curse, it lists over 200 laws, which it is claims covers every conceivable conflict between the Iraqi people of its day, and for generations to follow.  <em>The Code of Hammurabi </em>is one of the oldest  (if not the oldest) and most complete records of law known in the world today. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><em>Hammurabi, the protecting king of Iraq am I.  <a href="fnShowZoom('11081316','FD001340')"></a></em></span></p>
<p><em><span style="font-family:Georgia;">The great gods have called me</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> in order to declare justice in the land, to settle all disputes, and heal all injuries, set up <a href="fnShowZoom('11081316','FD001340')"></a>these my precious words, written upon my memorial stone, before the image of me, as king of righteousness. </span></em></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><em>Let the oppressed, read the inscription. The inscription will explain his case to him; he will find out what is just:</em></span></p>
<p><em><span style="font-family:Georgia;">When he reads the record, let him pray with full heart to Marduk, my lord, and Zarpanit, my lady; <!---<A href="CODE10.HTM" TARGET="sub">&#8211;>and then shall the <img align="right" src="http://members.telering.at/art4u/hussein.jpg" />protecting deities and the gods, who frequent E-Sagil, graciously grant the desires daily presented before Marduk, my lord, and Zarpanit, my lady.</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">    In future time, through all coming generations, let the king, who may be in the land, observe the words of righteousness which I have written on my monument; let him not alter the law of the land which I have given, the edicts which I have enacted; my monument let him not mar the rule, statute, and law of the land <img border="1" align="left" width="200" src="http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/4/4b/200px-Hammurabi_Face.jpg" alt="Hammurabi bust" height="249" style="width:200px;height:249px;" />which I have given.</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">&#8220;If this ruler does not esteem my words, withdraw from him the glory of royalty, break his scepter, curse his destiny. May Bel, <!---<A href="CODE2.HTM" TARGET="sub">2</A> &#8212;>the lord who fixes destiny, order a rebellion which his hand can not control; may he let the wind of the overthrow of his habitation blow, may he ordain the years of his rule in groaning, years of scarcity, years of famine, darkness without light, death with seeing eyes be fated to him; may Bel order with his potent mouth the destruction of his city, the dispersion of his subjects, the cutting off of his rule, the removal of his name and memory from the land.</span></em></p>
<p align="left"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><em>May Ishtar, <!---<A href="CODE17.HTM" TARGET="sub">17</A>&#8212;>the goddess of fighting and war change his grace into evil and shatter his weapons on the place of fighting and war, create disorder and sedition for him, strike down his warriors, deliver him into the hands of his enemies, and imprison him in the land of his enemies.</em> <a href="http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/MESO/CODE.HTM">http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/MESO/CODE.HTM</a></span></p>
<p align="left"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Hammurabi, Sixth King of Mesopotamia (Iraq), 1810 B.C. -1750 B.C. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammurabi">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammurabi</a></span></p>
<p align="left"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong><img align="left" src="http://schema-root.org/region/middle_east/iraq/history/leaders/saddam_hussein/saddam_hussein.jpg" />WAS THE ANGLO-AMERICAN WAR IN IRAQ A TRAP?</strong></span></p>
<blockquote>
<p align="left"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong>Law 1:</strong> If any one ensnare another, putting a ban upon him, but he can not prove it, then he that ensnared<!--===========/IMAGE===========--> him shall be put to death.  <em>The Code of Hammurabi</em><strong> </strong></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">The Daily Show</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart ran jokes about Saddam’s death sentence.  A Daily Show “reporter” did a fake “LIVE FROM BAGHDAD” segment under the headline “Autocratic Asphyxiation.” The reporter said the death sentence was part of a plea bargain because “hanging in </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> still constitutes death by natural causes”. <img border="1" align="right" width="147" src="http://www.bradblog.com/Images/JonStewart.jpg" alt="Jon Stewart" height="166" style="width:147px;height:166px;" /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Laughing, Stewart asked, “So when can we expect this hanging?” </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">“In the spring, Jon, and if you&#8217;ve never seen a spring hanging, with the noose silhouetted against the honeysuckle . . .”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Nigel Farndale of the telegraph.co.uk. reacted to the Daily Show “humor” by writing: </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">&#8220;I dare say Americans have stronger stomachs for this sort of thing. They are comfortable with the concept of capital punishment, as they demonstrate every year with the execution of more than 100 of their citizens. But I couldn&#8217;t watch any more. I felt sick. The gags made me gag. Judicial murder degrades and dehumanises all concerned: judge, jury and executioner. Making jokes about someone who is to be executed, even if that someone is a genocidal tyrant, does the same.” <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/11/12/do1205.xml&amp;sSheet=/opinion/2006/11/12/ixopinion.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/11/12/do1205.xml&amp;sSheet=/opinion/2006/11/12/ixopinion.html</a></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span><strong>TURNED OFF</strong> </span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.churchofreality.org/images/hanging.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.churchofreality.org/wisdom/content/blogsection/0/129/&amp;h=254&amp;w=240&amp;sz=19&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=ovWi1WZrBVpKgbQG2h9j7w&amp;start=14&amp;tbnid=srnnib0aom5JRM:&amp;tbnh=111&amp;tbnw=105&amp;ei=7ph7RdnEFaKWJPOCoN4L&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dhanging%2Bexecution%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DG"><img align="left" width="105" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:srnnib0aom5JRM:http://www.churchofreality.org/images/hanging.jpg" height="111" style="width:105px;height:111px;border:1px solid;" /></a>According to Wikipedia, the short drop is a form of execution used in most Middle Eastern countries that causes death by<a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/images/iran_execution_hanging.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/nuclear_roulette_and_the_band_plays_on/index.html&amp;h=589&amp;w=450&amp;sz=39&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=OagEA_6usUbJm5GlfKtP9g&amp;start=4&amp;tbnid=5-FrTeBqeR8W2M:&amp;tbnh=135&amp;tbnw=103&amp;ei=7ph7RdnEFaKWJPOCoN4L&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dhanging%2Bexecution%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DG"><img align="right" width="103" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:5-FrTeBqeR8W2M:http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/images/iran_execution_hanging.jpg" height="135" style="width:103px;height:135px;border:1px solid;" /></a> aphyxiation.  You do  it  by putting the condemned man on the back of a horse or a cart with the noose around his neck. The horse is then spanked away, the doomed is yanked from his perch and dangled by the neck until dead.  Another way is to execute the short drop is to use a step ladder which is pulled away, leaving the victim hanging. A man hanged by a step ladder is said to have been &#8220;turned off.&#8221;<strong> </strong></span></p>
<p><span><strong>MARK TWAIN&#8217;s HANGING</strong></span></p>
<p><span>The long drop is the preferred method in America calculated to kill the victim with a drop that is just long enough to break his neck without completely decapitating him.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span><img border="1" align="left" width="180" src="http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g209/goaflow/2001-08-30-mark-twain.jpg" alt="Mark Twain" height="180" style="width:180px;height:180px;" />&#8220;My own suspense was almost unbearable &#8212; my blood was leaping through my veins, and my thoughts were crowding and trampling upon each other. Twenty moments to live &#8212; fifteen to live &#8212; ten to live &#8212; five &#8212; three &#8212; heaven and earth, how the time galloped! &#8212; and yet that man stood there unmoved though he knew that the sheriff was reaching deliberately for the drop while the black cap descended over his quiet face! &#8212; then down through the hole in the scaffold the strap-bound figure shot like a dart! &#8212; a dreadful shiver started at the shoulders, violently convulsed the whole body all the way down, and died away with a tense drawing of the toes downward, like a doubled fist &#8212; and all was over! </span><span>I saw it all. I took exact note of every detail, even to Melanie&#8217;s considerately helping to fix the leather strap that bound his legs together and his quiet removal of his slippers &#8212; and I never wish to see it again. I can see that stiff, straight corpse hanging there yet, with its black pillow-cased head turned rigidly to one side, and the purple streaks creeping through the hands and driving the fleshy hue of life before them. Ugh!&#8221; Mark Twain report to the Chicago Republican on the hanging of John Millian, the convicted murderer of Julia Bullette. <a href="http://dmla.clan.lib.nv.us/docs/nsla/archives/mtwain.htm">http://dmla.clan.lib.nv.us/docs/nsla/archives/mtwain.htm</a></span></p>
<p><span><img align="middle" width="550" src="http://mshistory.k12.ms.us/features/feature57/images/hanging_L.jpg" height="385" style="width:550px;height:385px;" /></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span></span><span><strong>A SLOW AND AGONIZING DEATH</strong></span><span> </span><span><span> </span></span></p>
<p align="left"><span><span>The face becomes engorged, turns blue through lack of oxygen and shows the classic signs of strangulation, little red dots on the face and in the eyes from burst blood vessels. The tongue sticks out, evidence of a  slow and agonising death by strangulation.  More at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanging">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanging</a></span></span><span> </span></p>
<p align="left"><span></span><span><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">American Justice, Iraqi Style</span></strong></span></p>
<p align="left"><span><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong></span><span><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Just what is meant by the word law, and how is it applied comparitively in these two societies? Can American law provide for Iraqi justice? </span></strong></span><span><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">The word &#8220;law&#8221; comes from the Anglo  Old Norse plural of lay, meaning those things laid down and settled. Follow along and this gets interesting. There is a nexus in this word<em> lay</em> in the English use of it. In the context of <em>laity </em>lay means “someone not of the clergy or professions,” traced back to the Greek “laos;” laos means the people, referred to as the “laity”; a layman is a common man, and in the oldest traditions<span>  </span>of the law, the law man was the lay man. </span></strong></span></p>
<p align="center"><span><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"><img align="left" src="http://www.ritilan.com/archives/images/blogimages/010904_saddam01lg.PNG" /></span></strong></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"><strong>Law #2:</strong>    If any one bring an accusation against a man, and the accused go to the river and leap into the river, if he sink in the river his accuser shall take possession of his house. But if the river prove that the accused is not guilty, and he escape unhurt, then he who had brought the accusation shall be put to death, while he who leaped into the river shall take possession of the house that had belonged to his accuser.  <em>The Code of Hammurabi</em></span></span></strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">It is my underlying thesis here that the American legal system is one of </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">America</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">’s inherent strength. Not only does she have a large legal class trained in the finer points of law, but more importantly, her trump card is that she employs her laity, the common man as the bulwark of the law.<span>  </span>Her professional class of lawyers is overseen by councils of grand and petit juries, constituted by her ordinary non professional citizens, drawn randomly from her communities. Her common class provides a check and balance for her professional class.<span>  </span></span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"><span></span>This is not entirely unusual on the planet, but the American grand and petit Juries appear to be unique in the world today. </span></strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"><strong>Law #3: </strong>If any one bring an accusation of any crime before the elders, and does not prove what he has charged, he shall, if it be a capital offense charged, be put to death. <em>The Code of Hammurabi</em><br />
</span></strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">It may be just coincidence that the one country that makes most use of her laity as jurists in deliberating in actions in law has been regarded as the wealthiest, its high crime rate notwithstanding.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">The lay jury system essentially throws into the system a roll of the dice.<span>  </span>There’s no control by the legal class of who sits <img align="right" src="http://www.conscelebres.com/numero10/photosindex/saddam-hussein.jpg" />on the indictment jury, and control of who sits on the petit juries is restrained.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">The tradition of the laity being the law, as is exemplified in democracy and Western juries is at times in conflict with the carnival atmosphere of show trials attendant to professional lawyers and judges. Do commercial pressures on the law affect our judgment of it?</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Consider how powerful the secret grand Jury is in American society. A Federal grand Jury can indict anyone or anything, from<span>  </span>the President of the United States down to . . . it has been said jokingly . . .<span>  </span>a ham sandwich.<span>  </span></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">The grand Jury arguably has more power than any other collective body in American government, and yet it remains a collection of anonymous laymen, selected at random, who are paid nothing but a minimum of their expenses, dragooned by duty to temporarily sit as secret, and hopefully impartial judges, assembled to decide whether or not to formerly accuse, or indict, those suspected of crimes.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Traditionally, if the grand Jury indicts, it issues what is called a &#8220;true bill&#8221; and remands the accused for trial by a petit jury.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Sortition is a lottery, where the choices are made by chance. In this way the jury differs from a government of democratic election, as a government of Anglo Saxon sortition. Greco-American democracy and the Anglo-American jury system theoretically synchronize to work side by side in American society.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></p>
<blockquote>
<p align="justify">&#8220;Juries invest each citizen with a sort of magisterial office; they make all . . . feel that they have duties toward society and that they take a share in its government.&#8221; Alexis de Tocqueville,<em> Democracy in America<sup></sup></em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.ritilan.com/archives/images/blogimages/010904_saddam02lg.PNG"><img border="0" align="right" src="http://www.ritilan.com/archives/images/blogimages/010904_saddam02sm.PNG" /></a> The Anglo-American war to make </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"> democratic raises the question of what kind of legal system American lawmakers are settling for in </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">. If it is incumbent on American foreign policy to impose a political system on a country, then the question of what kind of legal system that country is supposed to have automatically goes with it. Is American style democracy compatible with the Iraqi legal system? If not, will </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">America</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"> face the task of changing the Iraqi legal system? Is civil war breaking out in </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"> because the Iraqi legal system cannot temper the will of the masses evoked by democracy? </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">If there is an incompatibility between the political and legal systems of </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">, could it be because the ideologues of American law and politics have not identified it as a problem yet?</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"><strong>O.J. GOLFS, <span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"><strong>SADDAM HANGS</strong></span></span></strong></span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">When Americans fing themselves in a position of having to deploy their political system in a foreign country that they have invaded, they also find themselves in the position of having to deploy a compatible legal system to go with it.<span>  </span>It naturally follows then that Americans must believe that their legal and political systems are profoundly good and wise. It must also be understood, that a political system cannot operate without a compatible legal system. </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">The trial of O.J. Simpson shook American confidence in the jury&#8217;s ability to render competent verdicts.  In India the jury system, have given up the use of juries over cases where the popular opinion was that the accused should have been found guilty. </span></strong></p>
<p></span></strong></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"><strong>Law #4: </strong> If he satisfy the elders to impose a fine of grain or money, he shall receive the fine that the action produces.  <em>The Code of Hammurabi</em></span></p></blockquote>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Once the Prime Directive of noninterference has been violated, it is even more irresponsible to simply walk away from it <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://newsfromrussia.com/images/newsline/saddam_hussein.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://newsfromrussia.com/world/2005/11/09/67330.html&amp;h=252&amp;w=220&amp;sz=12&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=qMZv7RBN8RY8pxO9Vbd2ag&amp;start=8&amp;tbnid=Khg7rMT6GszMgM:&amp;tbnh=111&amp;tbnw=97&amp;ei=apF7RdeGHqKiJIeitOcL&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsaddam%2Bhussein%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DG"><img align="left" width="97" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:Khg7rMT6GszMgM:http://newsfromrussia.com/images/newsline/saddam_hussein.jpg" height="111" style="width:97px;height:111px;border:1px solid;" /></a>without leaving an operational system that keeps crime and mayhem at a minimum.<span>  </span>Can Americans claim that their politico-legal system keeps crime and mayhem at a minimum? Or would </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">America</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"> be exporting her own chaos in imparting her political and legal systems to </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">? </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Twice, </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"> may not have a trained legal class to sustain an adversarial legal system. However, the beauty of the American legal system is its willingness to draw its judges from the common population to create, in effect, a common law judicature that is not necessarily dependent on a trained legal class. The grand jury does not employ the adversarial process.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Rather, it employs the inquistitorial where proceedings are secret and the accused is questioned directrly by the jury which also acts as the final judge, for indictment.  The grand Jury can operate with no professional judge or attorney, and theoretically, if it could not only indict, why couldn&#8217;t it also try, abjure, find innocent or convict?  Where there is no petit jury to remand to, where there is no adversarial process, the grand Jury form of proceedings could also act as the final arbiter.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Can a common law judicature be created in </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">? This is a profound question.  </span></strong></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"><strong>LAW #5: </strong>   If a judge try a case, reach a decision, and present his judgment in writing; if later error shall <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.willisms.com/archives/saddamhussein.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.willisms.com/archives/2005/05/index.html&amp;h=375&amp;w=300&amp;sz=82&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=rVUYrQLkwrrjxHcu0xmb6A&amp;start=6&amp;tbnid=XdRfR9UWMkfmwM:&amp;tbnh=122&amp;tbnw=98&amp;ei=apF7RdeGHqKiJIeitOcL&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsaddam%2Bhussein%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DG"><img align="right" width="98" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:XdRfR9UWMkfmwM:http://www.willisms.com/archives/saddamhussein.jpg" height="122" style="width:98px;height:122px;border:1px solid;" /></a>appear in his decision, and it be through his own fault, then he shall pay twelve times the fine set by him in the case, and he shall be publicly removed from the judge&#8217;s bench, and never again shall he sit there to render judgement.  <em>The Code of Hammurabi</em></span></p></blockquote>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">We want them to have peace and prosperity, just as we wish it for ourselves. </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">American democracy, with its will of the majority and all its election pageantry, tempered by the law as uttered out of the mouths of faceless American juries, are contrasted here in this article with the capture of a foreign leader, Saddam Hussein, by American forces. Hussein is put on trial in his own country under American martial rule.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">What form of law is used to judge Hussein? And will it stick? How will it be judged historically by the Iraqi and American people, and the rest of the world? </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">What kind of justice is being wrought here? What stage does it set for future justice in </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">America</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">, with her death sentences, prisons and crimes?<span>  </span>Can American justice work in foreign lands? </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Does it work in her own?</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"><a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://newsfromrussia.com/images/newsline/saddam_hussein.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://newsfromrussia.com/world/2005/11/09/67330.html&amp;h=252&amp;w=220&amp;sz=12&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=qMZv7RBN8RY8pxO9Vbd2ag&amp;start=8&amp;tbnid=Khg7rMT6GszMgM:&amp;tbnh=111&amp;tbnw=97&amp;ei=apF7RdeGHqKiJIeitOcL&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsaddam%2Bhussein%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DG"></a>Contrast American justice with other systems of law-finding in other countries, such as </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">Japan</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">, </span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;">India</span></strong><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"> and in Arabic and European countries, where sometimes professional judges alone decide the outcome of cases.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">I DARE SAY . . .</span></strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">  </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.elroyjetson.org/post_images/saddam.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.elroyjetson.org/2005/12/&amp;h=258&amp;w=191&amp;sz=10&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=hOuzGVTjsBBofBHIop-PYQ&amp;start=46&amp;tbnid=f9PuEqcW4ALV1M:&amp;tbnh=112&amp;tbnw=83&amp;ei=6JZ7Rd3hIs2sJOby_e8L&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsaddam%2Bhussein%26start%3D36%26ndsp%3D18%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN"><img align="left" width="83" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:f9PuEqcW4ALV1M:http://www.elroyjetson.org/post_images/saddam.jpg" height="112" style="width:83px;height:112px;border:1px solid;" /></a>Was Saddam Hussein indicted for murder or any other crime by a jury of his peers?</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">I don’t think so.  The references I’ve found so far to an “Iraqi jury” appear to be mainly mere assumptions on the part of uninformed American pundits and bloggers (what is the difference?)  In truth, apparently, Iraqi juries don&#8217;t exist. </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">From a Google News Search, </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">11/11/06</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">: “Your search &#8211; ‘<strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Iraqi juries’ OR ‘</span></strong></span><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span></strong><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> juries’</span></strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">  &#8211; did not match any documents.” </span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><em><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Jurist,</span></em><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> at <a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/">http://jurist.law.pitt.edu</a> , a Web based legal research service run by the University of Pittsburgh School of Law reports:   </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">“The Iraqi judiciary is not independent, and there is no check on the President’s power to override any court decision. In 1999 the UN Special Rapporteur on </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> and international human rights groups observed that the repressive nature of the political and legal systems <em><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">precludes the rule of law</span></strong></em>.  . . .  Trials in the regular courts are public, and defendants are entitled <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.lowculture.com/archives/images/sht_06_upgod.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.lowculture.com/archives/2004/07/&amp;h=221&amp;w=320&amp;sz=8&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=28P1ZJQJUqLxwLbMNQUD2w&amp;start=10&amp;tbnid=QiDCoHUo2xUtvM:&amp;tbnh=81&amp;tbnw=118&amp;ei=apF7RdeGHqKiJIeitOcL&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsaddam%2Bhussein%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DG"><img align="right" width="118" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:QiDCoHUo2xUtvM:http://www.lowculture.com/archives/images/sht_06_upgod.jpg" height="81" style="width:118px;height:81px;border:1px solid;" /></a>to counsel, at government expense in the case of indigents. Defense lawyers have the right to review the charges and evidence brought against their clients. . . .  <strong><em><span style="font-family:Georgia;">There is no jury system</span></em></strong>; panels of three judges try cases.”  </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/world/iraq.htm">http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/world/iraq.htm</a></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> </span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">The emphasis is mine.<span>  </span>I haven&#8217;t seen anything otherwise to indicate that the trial of Saddam Hussein was tried in any way different than the way described by <em><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Jurist.</span></em> </span></p>
<ul>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">THERE IS NO JURY SYSTEM IN </span><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">IRAQ</span></strong></strong><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">.  </span></strong></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">THE IRAQI JUDICIARY IS NOT INDEPENDENT.  </span></strong></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">THERE IS NO CHECK ON THE PRESIDENT’S POWER TO OVERRIDE ANY COURT DECISION </span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">The judiciary in the Iraqi constitution contains no reference to a jury in its judiciary section. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposed_Iraqi_constitution">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposed_Iraqi_constitution</a>  </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> apparently has no ”jury” other than what has been stated; panels of three judges try cases. From the </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">land</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> of </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Hammurabi</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">, that is their traditional law.  </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong>NOT FOR THE SUPERSTITIOUS</strong> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Iraq may well be the birthplace of the oldest written laws on the planet, known as <em>The Code of Hammurabi,</em>   282 statutes full of death sentences, immolations and impalings, governing the disposition of slaves, wives, children, incest, adultery and presumably just about any kind of dispute, including judicial error. </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> <strong>Law #21: </strong>If any one break a hole into a house (break in to steal), he shall be put to death before that hole <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.horaz.com/horazyclopedia/Photos/Hussein_Saddam/01_STD/Saddam_Hussein_Inculpation.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.horaz.com/horazyclopedia/Savoir/ARTICLES/Hussein_Saddam.htm&amp;h=190&amp;w=250&amp;sz=24&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=gMja3lXh5pKqKCC-3sSXGQ&amp;start=18&amp;tbnid=UWh5Exg2SM17gM:&amp;tbnh=84&amp;tbnw=111&amp;ei=apF7RdeGHqKiJIeitOcL&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsaddam%2Bhussein%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DG"><img align="right" width="111" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:UWh5Exg2SM17gM:http://www.horaz.com/horazyclopedia/Photos/Hussein_Saddam/01_STD/Saddam_Hussein_Inculpation.jpg" height="84" style="width:111px;height:84px;border:1px solid;" /></a>and be buried.  </span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">One can read in <em>Hammurabi</em>, that the Iraqi people have traditionally, depended upon a demagogue for leadership since the beginning of recorded time. Here is Hammurabi, speaking of himself and what he hasdone for his people, who he speaks of in terms of ownership:</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> I have not withdrawn myself from the men, whom Bel gave to me, the rule over whom Marduk gave to me, I was not negligent, but I made them a peaceful abiding-place. I expounded all great difficulties, I made the light shine upon them. With the mighty weapons which Zamama and Ishtar entrusted to me, <!---<A href="CODE8.HTM" TARGET="sub">8</A>&#8212;>with the keen vision with which Ea endowed me, <!---<A href="CODE9.HTM" TARGET="sub">9</A>&#8212;>with the wisdom that Marduk gave me, I have uprooted the enemy above and below (in north and south), subdued the earth, brought prosperity to the land, guaranteed security to the inhabitants in their homes; a disturber was not permitted. </span></p></blockquote>
<p align="left"><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Perhaps we should get back to talking about <em>The Code of John Benneth</em> </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">IS THE </span></strong><strong><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">U.S.</span></strong></strong><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> COMMITTED TO EXPORTING RULE OF LAW?</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Are we missing an important part of what we traditionally consider due process?</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><span> </span>It could be said then that without a <span class="style4"><span class="style6"><img align="right" width="200" src="http://www.streetcow.com/03-11-06_iraq_hanging.jpg" alt=" Iraq Hanging" height="300" style="width:200px;height:300px;" /></span></span>Hammarabi or a complete due process of law, </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> really doesn&#8217;t have a justice system at all. And maybe this is the key to the violence in </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">. Maybe it is a key to violence everywhere in the world. </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Jihadists and Crusaders alike should be emitting a loud “gulp.” As bad as he may be to you, consider that America may have essentially robbed Iraq of her Hammurabi. If America is going to do that, it has to replace it with another Hammurabi or something . . . if not a man, a process. Not just legislation, as in a code, but also a way of deliberating and executing that code. It would be stupid to assume tht the Iraqi people are legislative illiterates. To demonstrate the comphrensive and serious nature of this most ancient written law, read how  the Iraqi <em>Code of Hammurabi </em>sets severe penalties on a judge for judicial incompetence.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">HC #5:   If a judge try a case, reach a decision, and present his judgment in writing; if later error shall appear in his decision, and it be through his own fault, then he shall pay twelve times the fine set by him in the case, and he shall be publicly removed from the judge&#8217;s bench, and never again shall he sit there to render judgement. <a href="http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/MESO/CODE.HTM">http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/MESO/CODE.HTM</a></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Can George Bush afford 12 times what his poor judgment has cost the Iraqi people. Maybe he can get a little help from Rumsfeld, Halliburton and the Republkican Party to pay that off. Maybe they can get a thousand year loan from China.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">If Americans have the power to rain destruction on the Iraqi people, do they not ALSO have the transcendent power to rain down upon them their hypothetical system of justice? For the sake of those unjustly accused, is not the “rule of men” comparable to giving fish and bread to the hungry as the “rule of law” is comparable to teaching them how to fish and run bakeries? </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Could it be that </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/11/05/world/middleeast/06saddam.600.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/06/world/middleeast/06saddam.html&amp;h=340&amp;w=600&amp;sz=38&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=zuGjCm80WJwFg62vNTyJ-Q&amp;start=32&amp;tbnid=P_Mn4NBR05IawM:&amp;tbnh=75&amp;tbnw=133&amp;ei=gpd7RaTEB7eCJe67_KgK&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dhanging%26start%3D18%26ndsp%3D18%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN"></a>Is America</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> NOT demanding from the Iraqi people a system of justice BECAUSE she has not demanded <em>a true system of <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/11/05/world/middleeast/06saddam.600.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/06/world/middleeast/06saddam.html&amp;h=340&amp;w=600&amp;sz=38&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=zuGjCm80WJwFg62vNTyJ-Q&amp;start=32&amp;tbnid=P_Mn4NBR05IawM:&amp;tbnh=75&amp;tbnw=133&amp;ei=gpd7RaTEB7eCJe67_KgK&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dhanging%26start%3D18%26ndsp%3D18%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN"><img align="left" width="133" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:P_Mn4NBR05IawM:http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/11/05/world/middleeast/06saddam.600.jpg" height="75" style="width:133px;height:75px;border:1px solid;" /></a>justice for herself?</em> </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">If </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">America</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> is in a position, as an occupying force imposing martial law rule on </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">, then cannot the President of the </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">United States</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> mandate a common law jury system? If Americans are going to impose elections on Iraqis, why can’t they also impose a jury system? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">SO MOTE IT BE</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Are Americans in </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> law givers or simply temporal conquerors?  Is not </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">America</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> supposed to be EXPORTING  &#8220;democracy” to the former Arab </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">republic</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> of </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">? Where did all this despotism, brutality, dehumanization and a dysfunctional judicial system come from? </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Texas</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">? <img align="right" src="http://www.ahwaz.org.uk/images/afrawi-hanging.jpg" /> </span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">If democracy is for export, and the test for true democracy is a rule of law, then what constitutes democracy and rule of law? Is it possible that the tyranny of the masses is incompatible with the rule of law? </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">If there is anything truly within American power to impart to the Iraqi people, then should it not be something of real value, like what Lysander Spooner called “the palladium,” the nucleus of a just legal system? If it is not trial by jury that makes for rule of law, then what is it? Is it law by <em>appointed mercenary? </em></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">What is the best traditional American argument that has been made for a judicial process that uses juries taken from the people at large? </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">“The ‘trial by jury,’ is a ‘trial by the country.’ It is a trial by the people, as distinguished from a trial the government.” – Lysander Spooner <a href="http://www.lysanderspooner.org/bib_new.htm">http://www.lysanderspooner.org/bib_new.htm</a></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Spooner’s distinction between jury and government should make one stop and think for a moment. </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Does the </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">United States</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">, or any country for that matter, really, in truth, conduct trials by the people? Or are all our modern legal systems, even those that make use of lay juries, essentially trials by the government? This is a seminal issue for a necessary and universal axionomy; it is the foundation for a national value system. Without real juries, can there be true justice? Without justice, can there be real peace? </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">What are the differences between a “trial by the people” and a “trial by the government,” and why is it important that we recognize those differences?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Lysander Spooner </span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Perhaps as seminal as the Code of Hammurabi, more important and more advanced are Lysander Spooner&#8217;s essays on the law.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Spooner was a 19th century common law Boston lawyer. He loved dissembling code, constitution and legislature in the grinder of legal process. To Spooner, one thing and one thing only stands above it all, and that is, was and ever shall be</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong>TRIAL BY JURY </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span></strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><a href="http://www.lysanderspooner.org/bib_new.htm">http://www.lysanderspooner.org/bib_new.htm</a></span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Spooner</span></strong><span style="font-family:Georgia;">: It was anciently called “trial per pais” that is, “trial by the country.” And now, in every criminal trial, the jury are told that the accused “has, for trial, put himself upon the country; which country you (the jury) are.” The object of this trial “by the country,” or by the people, in preference to a trial by the government, is to guard against every species of oppression by the government. In order to affect this end, it is indispensable that the people, or “the country,” judge of and determine their own liberties against the government; <em>instead</em> of the government’s judging of and determining its own powers over the people. How is <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://raforum.apinc.org/IMG/jpg/spooner.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://raforum.apinc.org/article.php3%3Fid_article%3D49&amp;h=399&amp;w=256&amp;sz=5&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=a2aETcdjVXupyg-wvc2M6g&amp;start=2&amp;tbnid=RBw2sSs9spnoCM:&amp;tbnh=124&amp;tbnw=80&amp;ei=QZ17RcGpC7vmJIjQnPEL&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3DLysander%2BSpooner%26ndsp%3D18%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN"><img align="right" width="80" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:RBw2sSs9spnoCM:http://raforum.apinc.org/IMG/jpg/spooner.jpg" height="124" style="width:80px;height:124px;border:1px solid;" /></a>it possible that juries can do anything to protect the liberties of the people against the government if they are not allowed to determine what those liberties are?</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">“The trial by jury,” then, is a “trial by the country” —that is by the people as distinguished from a trial by the government.</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Any government, that is its own judge of, and determines authoritatively for the people, what are its own powers over the people, is a tyranny, an absolute government of course. It has all the powers that it chooses to exercise. There is no other — or at least no more accurate — definition of despotism than this. It is supposed that, if twelve men be taken, <em><span style="font-family:Georgia;">by lot</span></em>, from the mass of the people, without the possibility of any previous knowledge, choice, or selection of them, on the part of the government, the jury will be a fair epitome of “the country” at large, and not merely of the party or faction that sustain the measures of the government; that substantially all classes, of opinions, prevailing among the people, will be represented in the jury; and especially that the opponents of the government, (if the government have any opponents,) will be represented there, as well as its friends; that the classes, who are oppressed by the laws of the government, (if any are thus oppressed,) will have their representatives in the jury, as well as those classes, who take sides with the oppressor — that is, with the government.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Hitting close to home? I don&#8217;t know what you may think, but to me, this guy Spooner is <em>brilliant, </em>the American Coke, the Shakespeare of law.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">It is fairly presumable that such a tribunal will agree to no conviction except such as <em><span style="font-family:Georgia;">substantially the whole country</span></em> would agree to, if they were present, taking part in the trial. A trial by such a tribunal is, therefore, in effect, “a trial by the country.” In its results it probably comes as near to a trial by the whole country, as any trial that it is practicable to have, without too great inconvenience and expense. And, as unanimity is required <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.liberalismo.org/img/secciones/spooner.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.liberalismo.org/articulos/50/&amp;h=180&amp;w=150&amp;sz=5&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=UG7XFkh8nxRnBM7aT-rHlg&amp;start=6&amp;tbnid=sd0fDkkZDszqBM:&amp;tbnh=101&amp;tbnw=84&amp;ei=QZ17RcGpC7vmJIjQnPEL&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3DLysander%2BSpooner%26ndsp%3D18%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN"><img align="left" width="84" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:sd0fDkkZDszqBM:http://www.liberalismo.org/img/secciones/spooner.jpg" height="101" style="width:84px;height:101px;border:1px solid;" /></a>for a conviction, it follows that no one can be convicted, except for the violation of such laws as substantially the <em><span style="font-family:Georgia;">whole</span></em> country wish to have maintained. The government can enforce none of its laws, (by punishing offenders, through the verdicts of juries,) except such as substantially the whole people wish to have enforced. The government, therefore, consistently with the trial by jury, can exercise no powers over the people, (or, what is the same thing, over the accused person, who represents the rights of the people,) except such as substantially the whole people of the country consent that it may exercise. In such a trial, therefore, “the country,” or the people, judge of and determine their own liberties against the government, instead of the [*8] government’s judging of and determining its own powers over the people. <a href="http://www.lysanderspooner.org/bib_new.htm">http://www.lysanderspooner.org/bib_new.htm</a></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong>SADDAM&#8217;S DEFENSE IS MY OWN  . . .  AND YOURS</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Spooner makes a fascinating and unusual statement here that I think we should not let pass without highlighting it, and that is &#8220;the accused person, who represents the rights of the people.&#8221; This is a profound statement. The man writes like an avatar!</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Now, how might we assume the professional class of attorneys to respond? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">The argument for the professional judge could be that he is more learned in the law and is less apt to be swayed by emotional arguments. It has been said that if you are innocent, choose a trial by judge, for he is more likely to see it, but if you are guilty, take your chances with a jury. But what is more important, deciding guilt and innocence for one man, or <img align="right" src="http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2006/02/20/PH2006022001492.jpg" />the integrity of a process which prevents tyranny? Who really is more prejudiced? Is it the common man executing his duty, or the mercenary there for his dollar? Who has a greater investment in the outcome? Is it the man who is there for one day, or is it a man who is there for public notoriety, while ducking censure for a career? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">If the mercenary judge makes an unpopular decision, then look at what is imperiled: His livelihood. But what comparatively has the lay judge to lose in the sacrifice of justice? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">These arguments I&#8217;m raising in the question of Hussein, who in turns sharpens the point. In Spooner’s wisdom, Saddam represents for all of us the rights of the people. </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">How would Saddam Hussein look in the judgment of his peers? If Americans cannot affect their justice in a foreign land that they presumably can control through force of arms, what then are </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">U.S.</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> bombs doing there?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">When was there greater murder and chaos? Was it under Hussein&#8217;s rule, or Bush&#8217;s rule?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Judith Sheindlin, better known as <em>Judge Judy and</em> presides over a humiliating small claims court on TV, has surpassed Oprah as the highest paid woman on TV.</span></p>
<ul>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Why not put Saddam Hussein on trial in front of Judge Judy with George Bush as the plaintiff? How different, really, is the trial of Saddam Hussein from TV court? </span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia;">If not then, if that is obviously ricidulous, what kind of trial, or process, has Hussein asked for?</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Does not a jury system founded on the laity carry more weight and finality to it than anything that could be said by processional, appointed or elected judges? </span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><img align="left" src="http://www.cnn.com/2000/LAW/07/27/grand.jury/jury.jpg" />The beauty of sortition is that the judges, it can be said, were not selected by men, but selected by God, or in </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Iraq</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">, by Allah. Only the Atheist can complain that results compunded by Fate are not ideal.<span>  </span>Would we not be more inclined to accept the judgment of peers, and more inclined to suspect the judgment of paid professionals? </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Perhaps, after deliberation, an Iraqi jury might decide to drop the charges against Hussein, dust him off and return him to rule. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Slight chance you say? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">The beauty, as I see it, of Spooner’s jury, is not necessarily in its deliberative prowess, but ultimately in its power to settle the matter. We can say that if<span>  </span>Saddam Hussein, for example, was, for our entertainment and<span> </span>his humiliation sake, put in <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2006/WORLD/meast/06/27/hussein.trial/story.saddam.file.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/06/27/hussein.trial/index.html&amp;h=242&amp;w=220&amp;sz=6&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=e7mmT0mGhRryDkbPA97usA&amp;start=16&amp;tbnid=wDYUT5wqZP0vrM:&amp;tbnh=110&amp;tbnw=100&amp;ei=apF7RdeGHqKiJIeitOcL&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsaddam%2Bhussein%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DG"></a>front of Judge Judy, and after making fun of his shoes and his haircut she attempts to shame him for his massacre of Kurds, calling him a liar if he denied it, crazy if he tried to justify it, or a fool if he didn’t, and she gavels him down for the death penalty, and like on the Daily Show we all laugh and applaud, what do we really have for it? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Angry mobs would say that a Jewish woman, in all the glory of her prejudice and ignorance, gave this verdict, and it would humimliate them even mofre. But how would the reaction compare to a similar verdict rendered by Iraqis?  </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">How much better as human beings are we for our deliberations and processes? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">When having a little fun, while taking your mind off your cares of the day, how is watching trial by a Judy-cat-sure any different than taking part in the Roman games, where children and their parents were torn apart by crazed animals in front of the breathless crowd?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">I&#8217;ve heard the woman insist she could read minds . . . </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Those Roman games, by the way, stopped after the overthrow by Christianity. Maybe a similar application would silence Judy.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Now, of Hussein, you might say, “the jury ain’t gonna convict that guy,” but how do you know? And what’s more important, the conviction you want in one case or the process that rules them all? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">What’s more important, your dignity or your fun? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Sure, Judge Judy or someone like her, is essentially what he has now, and could rip him apart to the joy and satisfaction of millions. But what has happened to an elegant process in your mind? Where has it gone? If we’ve had such a dull and painstaking process as trial by jury for so many years, why are we discarding it now? It wouldn’t be because it isn’t as fun as the other, would it? It wouldn’t be because it threatens to not give us the results we want in our prejudiced and uninformed minds, would it? </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Are you thinking “Gosh, if some people take a closer look, sit down and really listen to the facts, they might not be able to come up with the verdict every one knows it should be, the one I’ve already set in my mind. And I want to see that guy hang!”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">But you’re judging everything on hearsay. What is going on here? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2006/WORLD/meast/06/27/hussein.trial/story.saddam.file.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/06/27/hussein.trial/index.html&amp;h=242&amp;w=220&amp;sz=6&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=e7mmT0mGhRryDkbPA97usA&amp;start=16&amp;tbnid=wDYUT5wqZP0vrM:&amp;tbnh=110&amp;tbnw=100&amp;ei=apF7RdeGHqKiJIeitOcL&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsaddam%2Bhussein%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DG"><img align="left" width="100" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:wDYUT5wqZP0vrM:http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2006/WORLD/meast/06/27/hussein.trial/story.saddam.file.jpg" height="110" style="width:100px;height:110px;border:1px solid;" /></a>You watch the news, you read the paper, and you talk to your friends. But what do you really know?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">When this horrid little war broke out, and the fleet was steaming over there to get Saddam and give him his come uppins, I heard it being wailed from the roof tops that he was insane. Where are those cries now for his defense? Yeah, in his <em>defense</em>. If he’s insane, shouldn’t he be rehabilitated?</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">It brings up a good question. Do we use the law to rehabilitate or do we use some monkey trial to vindicate?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">The jury process; even though it is ultimately run by amateurs, I can say it is honest. What would you or Hussein have to say to 12 people, chosen by God or Allah, if they found you or him guilty and sentenced you or him to hang? </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">We have the ability to run due process of law on conquered peoples, so why don’t we do it for the Iraqis? Why don’t we do it for those incarcerated at Gitmo?<span>  </span>Is it because they’re not Americans?<span>  </span>Have you forgotten? It was because of a theoretical absence of law that we went in there, to fill the vacuum. But of what? Are American rights not human rights? What does birthplace or position theoretically have to do with it?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">You know perfectly well (or should know) that b</span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">irthplace and position <em><span style="font-family:Georgia;">should have</span></em> nothing to do with it. The failure to administer due process of law is synchronous with its failure at home. </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">I suggest to you, that in the name of social justice, through the use of protective orders, thousands are being stripped of their civil rights without the judgment of a jury, without due process of law, not just abroad, but here on the American mainland.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Bills of attainder are at work in this land. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_attainder">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_attainder </a></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">  Thisis how the tyrannycreeps in until somebody sues. And just as war has filled the Iraqi vacuum of justice, I suggest to you, that so has civil disorder filled the American courtroom, because we have not met our responsibilities to resolve it first, as due process, in our minds.</span></p>
<p style="line-height:15.6pt;"><span style="font-family:Georgia;">This is not a game. This is serious business that requires your further deliberation.<span> If we are committed to laying any matter to rest, despite errors that layman may commit, iot is imperative that any serious matter be laid to rest with a trial by jury, and this includes the charges that have been brought against Saddam Hussein. </span></span></p>
<p style="line-height:15.6pt;"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><span>The results of ignoring the spirit exemplified in the curse of Hammurabi, failing to follow the best due process of law in a most serious matter, have been evident in streets awash in blood. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><span></span>Thank you. </span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"> </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">Your friend, </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">your best friend, </span><span style="font-family:Georgia;">your only friend, </span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"></span><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><strong>John Benneth</strong> </span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-family:Georgia;"><a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.gaycitynews.com/hanging/iranhanging.jpeg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.gaycitynews.com/hanging/hangingsawaken.html&amp;h=307&amp;w=189&amp;sz=4&amp;hl=en&amp;sig2=vItlxX-KfLSO00w_mhyDFQ&amp;start=2&amp;tbnid=WVGNddKzJeggfM:&amp;tbnh=117&amp;tbnw=72&amp;ei=IJp7RdaRAb3GJOqn4NsL&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dhanging%2Bexecution%26ndsp%3D18%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN"><img width="72" src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:WVGNddKzJeggfM:http://www.gaycitynews.com/hanging/iranhanging.jpeg" height="117" style="border:1px solid;" /></a></span><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/5/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/5/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/5/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/5/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/5/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/5/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/5/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/5/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/5/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/5/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/5/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/johnbenneth.wordpress.com/5/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=johnbenneth.wordpress.com&blog=516268&post=5&subd=johnbenneth&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2006/11/06/saddams-jury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/ce11c70a8da714478535208952d0eaed?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">johnbenneth</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.aoc.gov/images/hammurabi.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Hammuraabi</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:eUwsLsO2L6i6fM:http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iraq/images/saddam-card.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://untruenews.com/unimages/saddam_hussein.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Portrait of Saddam Hussein</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://members.telering.at/art4u/hussein.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/4/4b/200px-Hammurabi_Face.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Hammurabi bust</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://schema-root.org/region/middle_east/iraq/history/leaders/saddam_hussein/saddam_hussein.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.bradblog.com/Images/JonStewart.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Jon Stewart</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:srnnib0aom5JRM:http://www.churchofreality.org/images/hanging.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:5-FrTeBqeR8W2M:http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/images/iran_execution_hanging.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g209/goaflow/2001-08-30-mark-twain.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Mark Twain</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://mshistory.k12.ms.us/features/feature57/images/hanging_L.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.ritilan.com/archives/images/blogimages/010904_saddam01lg.PNG" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.conscelebres.com/numero10/photosindex/saddam-hussein.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.ritilan.com/archives/images/blogimages/010904_saddam02sm.PNG" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:Khg7rMT6GszMgM:http://newsfromrussia.com/images/newsline/saddam_hussein.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:XdRfR9UWMkfmwM:http://www.willisms.com/archives/saddamhussein.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:f9PuEqcW4ALV1M:http://www.elroyjetson.org/post_images/saddam.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:QiDCoHUo2xUtvM:http://www.lowculture.com/archives/images/sht_06_upgod.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:UWh5Exg2SM17gM:http://www.horaz.com/horazyclopedia/Photos/Hussein_Saddam/01_STD/Saddam_Hussein_Inculpation.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.streetcow.com/03-11-06_iraq_hanging.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"> Iraq Hanging</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:P_Mn4NBR05IawM:http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/11/05/world/middleeast/06saddam.600.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.ahwaz.org.uk/images/afrawi-hanging.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:RBw2sSs9spnoCM:http://raforum.apinc.org/IMG/jpg/spooner.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:sd0fDkkZDszqBM:http://www.liberalismo.org/img/secciones/spooner.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2006/02/20/PH2006022001492.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.cnn.com/2000/LAW/07/27/grand.jury/jury.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:wDYUT5wqZP0vrM:http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2006/WORLD/meast/06/27/hussein.trial/story.saddam.file.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:WVGNddKzJeggfM:http://www.gaycitynews.com/hanging/iranhanging.jpeg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>