The Denial

THE DENIAL of overwhelming proof for homeopathy exposes western medicine, not as hard science, but as political science, a vast, predatory scheme operating under the guise of “science,” devoted entirely to the enrichment of its owners. This is what makes homeopathy perennially the world’s most contentious subject. Quantum homeopathy has historically been the great challenger of the avowed supremacy of the condensed phase,StJohnofHomeopathy quantum homeopathy being the most misunderstood medicine, even though the most effective the planet has to offer.

I trust that your continued perusal of my work will serve to correct this. This is why you should openly support, and subscribe too The John Benneth Journal, filled with interesting, sometimes profound, sometimes profane but always exciting ideas and art . .

Please share your thoughts, fill in the comment section of this roundelay . .

JREF Million Dollar Challenge Winner The Good and Honourable Right Rabbi Doctor St. John of Homeopathy,  503 819 7777

JREF Million Dollar Challenge Winner The Good and Honourable Right Rabbi Doctor St. John of Homeopathy,
503 819 7777



It’s really nothing more than harassment of the traditionally superior medical doctrine of homeopathy by predatory practices (cloaked as medicine) to say to devotees that there’s no “science” supporting it.
How long have we been hearing this whining lie from patent pill pushers and the pseudoscientists that follow them, that there’s no “science” to homeopathy? How much longer do we have to listen to them misinterpreting Avogadro, claiming that it’s inert because there’s not one molecule in a homeopathic diluent? Why haven’t these fools been taught ionic theory and molecular dissociation? They should know by now, sticking a finger in a lit light socket elucidates the molecule to not be the only thing that can affect the human economy, nor is it the only active component of a pharmaceutical; when a molecule de-ionizes, its component electrons expand into the diluent and will continue to do so through countless serial dilutions, endlessly reproducing the effects of the solute: This is the soul of homeopathy’s physics. It may indeed be a true anomaly, but this isn’t a mere theory or novel invention, it’s been a known fact demonstrable by a NIST protocol of molar conductance for over a hundred years, that (as far as we know) the properties of the solute will perpetuate in the diluent throughout infinite dilution.

Graph showing asymptote at infinite dilution.

Graph showing asymptote at infinite dilution.

This should raise eyebrows, not hackles, but like any seemingly self-perpetuating phenomenon, in the name of cut and measure science it drives some people crazy, unless it’s a shut up effect, like the Methuselah half life of a radioactive element, and this is exactly what beta scintillation tests and actinic experiments on plants and animal subjects reveal homeopathic pharmaceuticals to be: Radioactive.

Perhaps there’s a better word for it. If there is I’d like to know what it is.

It’s not my CV to be solely prosaic without novelty, but none of this so far here is my invention. If you have a problem with accepting the physics of infinite dilution, don’t bark at me about it, it’s a fact, forget “science” and take it up with God.

HEAVY WATER: Physics of Homeopathic Metamorphosis and Charge with Supramolecular Aspects

Previous post: Chemistry of Homeopathy (a simple electrochemical explanation of homeopathic drugs)



Physics of Homeopathic Metamorphosis and Charge with  Supramolecular Aspects

by John R. Benneth

One of the charges against the practice of homeopathy is that the preparations it uses for medicine have no active ingredient in them other than plain water, and therefore, because plain water is thought to be inert, homeopathic remedies can have no biological action. It is the purpose of this essay to dispel these and other incorrect notions about homeopathy.

John Benneth psimon3

John Benneth, Heretic

It should be noted that the major complaints against homeopathy are not local, that is they cannot be a logical evaluation only of homeopathy without matching criteria for other forms of internal medicine. If they weren’t applied unilaterally against homeopathy, but were applied globally against the physico-chemistry of conventional internal medicine as well, there would not be a complaint against homeopathy such as they are by the people who are making them now, as the results of efficacy in clinical tests of homeopathy are almost exactly the same as those in allopathy (Milgrom).


An example of global homeopathic effects in allopathic pharmacy is the vaccine. The common vaccine is technically  homeopathic. It is the first distinction of homeopathy that like cures like, and the crude vaccine proves it.

This is a fact that even homeopaths appear loathe to accept. But anybody with an unbiased mind can see plainly what Hahnemann was first to point out, that diseases can be cured by the imposition of similar diseases.


. . . to which the word homeopathy alludes and therefore should not be attempted . . is that all good conventional vaccinations would have to be discontinued, because they are, in effect, not direct blocking mechanisms but actually homeopathic in their action.

This is a revolutionary but still a widely unrecognized fact, and due to sclerotic thinking will not be easily comprehended even by some homeopaths. But the evidence that it is true is found in definition and chemistry. The case could easily be made then that in eradicating small pox, man’s greatest medical achievement was homeopathic.
This is prima facie evidence that anyone who does not have a cursory knowledge of what vaccines are can easily see by looking up what constitutes vaccination . . and conclude that there is something drastically wrong in the way that modern conventional “medicine” thinks about curative therapy.

This one point, the conventional refusal to recognize or accept the actual meaning of the word “homeopathy”, and the unwitting use of it in modern medicine, should put a screeching halt to the 200 years of scorn and ridicule heaped in its direction, obloquy that has effectively curtailed any meaningful dialectic into just what modern medicine really is; and just what is the action and proper use of supramolecular materials.


Next we need to take a look as to what the specific excuse is for homeopathy not being accepted by the scientific community. As reasonable as it first may appear, it will be shown to be unreasonable in the final analysis. The prevailing belief has been that there are no physics to homeopathy, so the answer to its efficacy is perceived by the majority of the scientific “community” is that by the action of theatricals, it must be psychological. Once again the opposite will be shown to be true. As absurd as it may sound to some, the physics will be shown to stand behind homeopathy both in experimental evidence and in theory, and the argument against homeopathy to be completely emotional.

The putative complaint against most unrecognized phenomena, which has been maladapted by what should be regarded as the scientific community, is the presumption that because it shouldn’t be happening it isn’t happening, and such has been the complaint against homeopathy. The argument against homeopathy embraces then one that is purely emotional and essentially “unscientific,” the same as it is against other unconventional phenomenon such as telepathy and cold fusion.
The carpers should be forewarned: There is no legal case against homeopathy. This is because the evidence of action, shown both by popular usage and pre-clinical tests, has far outweighed the null hypothesis. Proof that the case against homeopathy is purely emotional and ridiculous is demonstrated by the lack of scientific studies of the placebo effect in the use of homeopathic remedies.



Dr. Rustum Roy,Dean of Material Sciences, Penn State, co-author of The Structure Of Liquid Water; Novel Insights From Materials Research; Potential Relevance To Homeopathy Rustum Roy, W.A. Tiller, Iris Bell, M. R. Hoover

The fact of the matter is that there’s nothing “plain” about water. Physical studies of water by the material sciences have proved (Roy, Pollack, Del Guidice, Montagnier, Benveniste, Chaplin) that through associative forces such as sigma and hydrogen bonds and van der Waals, water is highly susceptible to being structured in ways that affect its chemical properties. Examples of how the pure elements of water restructure to form radioactive or corrosive liquids are ditritium oxide, i.e. 3H20 and hydrogen peroxide, i.e. H2O2

Theory as to how it is that the apparently pure water used as medicine in homeopathic medical practice can have any biochemical effects has always been regarded as being akin to a process much like magnetic recording tape . . that water has a capability within it to erase a previously recorded magnetic signal, while recording and transmitting a new one from contact with solutes or exogenous radiation, including, most amazingly, neural radiation (Roy et al, Structure of Liquid Water, p. 600).

The water molecule is a relatively small one and it can easily penetrate into the crystalline lattice work of sub ionized matter where it can attach itself, and given its diamagnetic polar properties and tetrahedral shape, it has the capacity for self-assembly into chains and polyhedral forms defined by solid gel gas and plasma guests and phase heterogeneity. The hypothetical inability of liquid water to structure as such has been perceived to be due to hydrogen bond breakage within pico seconds, the argument being made especially by opponents of homeopathy seeking to discredit any possible assertion that water as a host solvent can structurally mimic guest materials within it. The inability of water to structure at liquid temperatures is merely a theory that can be easily dismissed by direct observation of clathrates, lattice like ice cages that form around guest solutes.


Emilio Del Guidice, Water Dynamics at the Root of Metamorphosis in Living Organisms

Water is unique in several regards. It cannot be replaced in biological functions by any other H-bonded liquid (Del Guidice, Water, p. 568). Most noticeably its high internal tension, second only to liquid Mercury, is evidently due to its accommodation of electromagnetic forces, and for this hypothesis it is these same forces that give it its great powers of solvation and the ionization of solute molecules.

In addition to being a polar molecule, the water molecule is protic, meaning it “donates” hydrogen.
Water technically is an electrical solvent. It has four connecting points on the bivalent oxygen atom, two positive and two negative. The polar protic qualities of the water molecule mean that H2O can form dynamic chains treating two conveyor belts, one pumping hydrogen in and the other vampiring hydrogen and bits of matter dislodged out of guest solutes, conveying ions from the guest particles within a water host solvent and transmuting them into the higher phase plasma charge.

This last suggestion is not a conveniently recognized fact, it is simply logical circulating reciprocity and a redox phase change.

The confusion of water as an electrical meme, its ability to carry the electromagnetic signal of solutes that have passed through it, comes from two basic misunderstandings about the phases of matter.

Water has been long regarded as a one phase liquid. But recently highly credible workers have come to regard liquid water as multiphasic, structurally inhomogeneous (Del Guidice, Water Dynamics at the Root of Metamorphosis in Living Organisms.) Prof. Gerald Pollack of the University of Washington has identified what he considers to be a fourth phase of water, H3O2, which he named exclusion zone (EZ) water, negatively charged pure water found adjacent to hydrophilic surfaces and in biological cells.

The three familiar phases of matter are solid, liquid, and gas. But there is also a phase of matter that is not considered in these discussions; this is the fourth phase, plasma, i.e. ionized gas.

Nobel laureate Luc-Montagnier, Electromagnetic Signals Are Produced by Aqueous Nanostructures Derived from Bacterial DNA Sequences

Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier, Electromagnetic Signals Are Produced by Aqueous Nanostructures Derived from Bacterial DNA Sequences

The rebuttal to those who would say that water is not a gas, and therefore cannot be called a plasma, need to be reminded that water is the quintessential plasma in that it is the formation of two elements, that when separate at liquid water temperatures are gasses: hydrogen and oxygen. When combined they become a liquid, due once again to water’s intense internal tensions. In addition, it should be noted that elemental phase shifts are gradual and not so sudden as expected.

In water all phases can be present at the same time.

According to Pollack, water takes on the action of a battery when exposed to light, especially infrared, and that water within the cells and when in contact with hydrophilic surfaces reorganizes itself into a different form.

“The water in your cells is not like the water in a glass of water,” says Pollack. “It is highly organized inside your cell.”
“Water molecules transform themselves next to those surfaces . . they’re no longer H2O, they’re actually organizing themselves into another structure and what we found is that this water that fills your cells is not like the kind of water we drink. Most people think water is boring H2O. What we found and what other people have found earlier is that the water is organized in some kind of regular fashion. It’s actually not H2O. It’s H3O2. When in contact with hydrophilic surfaces, it is like the molecules inside cells. So what happens is that the water molecules transform themselves, and this water’s physical and chemical properties are totally different from ordinary H2O. This kind of structure is similar to ice, similar to a crystal, it excludes solutes, heterogeneous material. It’s also charged, the charge of H3O2 is negative, and the water beyond it is positive., so it is basically like a battery. So next to all surfaces hydrophilic, including proteins, you have this special water, we call it EZ water.” (Pollack, 3:00 video)

Recently, in the theoretical frame of Quantum Optics, it has been discovered [53] that a closely packed ensemble of atoms is able to leak out photons (namely to give rise to a non vanishing e.m.f.), also in the absence of external driving, provided that the usual Rotating Wave Approximation (RWA), which is equivalent to neglect all the couplings between e.m. modes with different frequencies, is dropped. This result, which is derived rigorously from the basic equations of Quantum Optics, can be understood by recalling that in Quantum Physics the vacuum is able to exchange energy and momentum with matter, as shown by well known effects such as the Lamb-shift or the Casimir effect. Just considering the existence of the fluctuations of the quantum vacuum, as far back as in 1916, W. Nernst [54] suggested the possibility of tuning together the fluctuations of all the components of a system and therefore the appearance of a common phase. (Del Guidice)

“. . the energy lent originally by the quantum vacuum is given back through the above outflow of energy which is nothing else than the latent heat of the phase transition.” Del Guidice, Water Dynamics at the Root of Metamorphosis in Living Organisms, Emilio Del Giudice 1,2,*, Paola Rosa Spinetti 3 and Alberto Tedeschi 4



SO RADIOACTIVE IT GLOWS IN THE DARK – Swiss military watch with a tritium illuminated dial is an example of the pure elements of water (3H2O) carrying an electromagnetic charge, chemical proof for homeopathy.

The most demonstrable take-away here is the comparison of the ionized H2O of the homeopathic remedy with heavy water, 3H2O, ditritium oxide, pure water naturally ionized in the atmosphere, not by de-ionization of a solute, but like homeopathic remedies known as imponderabilia, ionized by bombardment from radiation, specifically cosmic rays. Ditritium oxide subsequently is used as a medical isotope, dragging along with it yet another medical classification for the homeopathic remedy, like “radiopharmaceutical.”

If heavy water can hold a electromagnetic charge, then so can the aqueous base of a homeopathic remedy hold a similar one

But these are just corollaries. How do such small amounts of +H2O work in revenant medicine?


Accordingly, these radiometric indices in a homeopathic remedy can be assayed in the 1kH range with a Benveniste coil, as was done by Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier in one of the most significant medico-physical studies of all time:,%20jan%202009)%20_p.pdf

The revelation of these facts should drive the pathological skeptic community mad with denial . .


Jacques Benveniste, dir. of immunology at France’s INSERM, in Davenas replicated an infamous biochemical test for proof of homeopathy (Poitevin), now replicated over two dozen times . . (Witt, 2007)

WITT, 2oo7: “The in vitro evidence for an effect of high homeopathic potencies—–A systematic review of the literature” lists dozens of successful biochemical tests  showing the action of the homeopathic remedy at the microscopic level . .


There is one aspect the chameleon of water leads us to in its miniscule application in triggering such dramatic effects in the organism: How is it that such a small amount of it, as can barely be detected in the little sugar pellets used in homeopathy, be biologically relevant?





Avogadro’s Constant hypothesis predicts electron pressure and the asymptote at infinite dilution.

Avogadro’s limit doesn’t apply to absence of solute in homeopathic remedies because of electron pressure enthalpy, a measure of energy in a thermodynamic system. its native heat, from the Schumann resonances, the background geomagnetic field, discovered first by Tesla, later by Schumann mid-twentieth century. Ionization of the solvent by dissociation of the solute molecule has been confirmed in the ultra-dilute remedy.

The solute in a dilute homeopathic remedy is not molecular because of de-ionization into electrons, . There are measures within analytic chemistry which prove it, such as conductance tests and transmission electron microscopy  (TEM).

All of the extreme controversy over whether or not the homeopathic remedy is placebo or verum, whether or not these materials are medically effective, and all of these phony money offers to “prove homeopathy”, conveniently avoid this simple, demonstrable fact, a fact that separates homeopathy from fiction: the solute in highly diluted solutions used as homeopathic drugs is ionized and can be physically detected by conventional chemical analysis.

Students and professors of electrochemistry should be well aware of this elementary principle of molecular dissociation, that as the solute presumably decreases, thins out and changes phase fron condensed to plasma, its conductivity increases to an asymptote and evidence of the solute persists in the solvent despite an apparent infinite number of dilutions.

Why or how the solute persists in infinite dilution is not clear, but strange as it may seem to the zenophobic, it does so, no matter how dilute it is in serial dilutions.

According to Copeland, the solute is not completely deionized until the sixth decimal dilution, at which point the aqueous solvent has completely dissociated the molecular structure of the solute by means of hydrolysis.

There are tests of molar conductance that demonstrate this.

The Chemistry of Homeopathy under the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

On April 20-21, 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) held a public hearing at its White Oak Campus to obtain information and comments from stakeholders about the current use of human drug and biological products labeled as homeopathic, as well as the Agency’s regulatory framework for such products. These products include prescription drugs and biological products labeled as homeopathic and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs labeled as homeopathic. FDA is still seeking written comments from all interested parties, including, but not limited to, consumers, patients, caregivers, health care professionals, patient groups, and industry. FDA is seeking input on a number of specific questions, but is interested in any other pertinent information participants would like to share. Please refer to the following documents for more information:
Federal Register Notice
Submit Comments to the Public Docket


As dry as this may seem at first, this is really a fascinating topic, and very psimon3 2010_05_01_16_12_21 001wet. A few months ago The Washington Post reported that by analyzing edit changes made by citizen contributors of articles in the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, they were able to determine that the two most contentious topics in the Western world are Jesus Christ and homeopathy.


Now you might not be surprised to hear that Jesus is still stirring up trouble, but without further erudition . . unless you’ve been in or close to the pot being stirred . . you might be a bit perplexed when told something as innocuous as “homeopathy” is rivaling Christ for the bad boy of the Western world distinction; but I would venture to say that if you  go further East I reckon homeopathy is also kicking Muhammed and Buddha in the skirts for the same title; and get this, it should be even even more perplexing to hear that both doctrines of Christ and homeopathy share atheists as their primary detractors!

“What’s this you say?”

Yes, it pains me to say it, but it’s true. Both Jesus and homeopathy are healers and both kickoveer money tables. The mere mention of the word “homeopathy” can send a malinformed atheist into a fit of glossolalia and make him dance like St. Vitus. There are innumerable high profile atheists, like Richard Dawkins and James Randi, who, when they’re not ridiculing a belief in the Deity and knocking the noses off of marbled saints, are tearing up the well manicured lawn in front of the great doctrine of Hahnemann House, crying a liturgy of shameless pseudoscience, so much so that homeopathy is something of a pariah in the Western mainstream media so slavishly chained to academic science and big money patent medicine . .  which in the case of homeopathy is now itself mouthing pseudoscience!

Now just to make this volte face clear, I’m not accusing homeopathy of being pseudoscience, no! I’m accusing skepticism of it! I’m here in this article doing something that’s never been done before in modern times, and certainly never done to this extent ever heretofore: I’m making the first installment of a presentation where I introduce the chemical principle of what has been thought to be a scientific impossibility, and that my friends is the chemistry of what most material scientists have insisted was a placebo, hoax and fraud, where every man jack of them is a patholgical atheist!

It’s true! And please don’t get me wrong or take me as poe. At times I have found a grudging respect for atheists. I am even inclined to believe they are amongst God’s favorites; they may not be speaking to him, but at least they’re not speaking for him as so many believers do.  But they don’t show this grace for homeopathy, nor in reality do they show it for science, and yes I know, I know, I’ve just thrown more boiling water on the storm troopers by saying that.

I am noting this to reveal an exposition of a pathology that stands in the way of accepting a known chemical principle. Be it because of pride or lacking a gear for reverse travel, they say and will continue to say, as they have said before, incorrectly, that there is no known chemistry to explain the action of the highly aqueous diluted materials used as medicine in the practice of homeopathy . .


. . and so they will still say,  even though it can now be explained to them with a chemical principal to the contrary, that because there’s not one MOLECULE in it of anything but plain water, the homeopathic solution cannot have any specific medical action of its own; therefore homeopathy is without reason and there can be no acceptable evidence for it; all evidence then for the fraud is dismissed!

That is what they say, the rampaging patent medicine engine cheers them on, and they are wrong. There is a widely known chemical principle that supports homeopathy and there are now widely known properties within classical chemistry that prove the action of these drugs. That neither homeopath nor skeptic is aware of the classical chemistry of homeopathy suggests that, as a gesture of compromise with other more insidious reasons, that, lacking finite limitations, the basic underlying chemical principle is sensed by the human mind and rejected . . and this is a premier example of a scientific cognitive dissonance. Both principle and property have been gathering dust in science, and the link between homeopathy and chemistry, once known, has up until now apparently been forgotten, ignored or expelled from classical science for over 100 years. Like a brazen Frankenstein I stand before the torchlit mob and shout “It lives!”

In other words, there is a classical chemistry to explain the potency of what former scientists have been screaming are inert placebos, incapable of intrinsically delivering the effects of their label. Furthermore, and in terms of the FDA, this next piece of information ought to bring everyone still sitting to their feet and the hearing to a halt: The chemistry of homeopathy was first presented by the progenitor of the modern FDA, the chief sponsor of the Food Drug and Cosmetics Act (FDCA)!


It should come as a great surprise . . if not shock and disbelief . . to proponent and opponent alike to learn — contrary to common belief and what is taught by putative skeptics, and medical and “homeopathy” schools alike — there is recognition within standard, classical chemistry, that with materials ionized by molecular dissociation in aqueous solutions, the properties of the solute are fixed and remain constantly in “infinite dilution”!

Furthermore, to the even greater distress of homeopath and skeptic alike, at least those who want to continue the obfuscation of supramolecular chemistry [the study of electric properties beyond the molecule] with homeopathy, associating the “homeopathic remedy” with the chemistry of molecular dissociation was done 106 years ago by none other than the medical doctor and professor of academic medicine who became a US Senator and the chief sponsor of FDA denture, the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), the man who gave the FDA its teeth, Senator Royal S. Copeland A.M., M.D.


Senator Royal S. Copeland, A.M., M.D.

In a 1909 article entitled “The Scientific Reasonableness of Homeopathy” by Royal S. Copeland, A.M., M.D.  he states:

“. . a chemical, technically an electrolyte, when dissolved, is dissociated into parts or particles smaller than the atoms and known as ions. The more dilute the solution the greater is the dissociation and consequently the atoms are less in number and the ions increased. In a solution infinitely dilute, the dissociation is absolute and the chemical is present only in a state of ionization.”

Read the whole article.

Although Copeland goes on to persuade using testimony from Kelvin and other authorities (while most homeopaths will remain paralyzed and silent) Copeland’s article will be dismissed in horror by skeptics, who will use its age and the fact that the author was a homeopath, as excuses for further obloquy of “homeopathy.”
There does indeed seem to be some confusion as to what exactly constitutes an ion, a confusion that persists to this day; but despite cries wishing for the contrary, modern classical chemistry still supports Copeland’s thesis, that the properties of ionized solutes remain constant throughout “infinite dilution.”
Running a search on Google for the number of appearances of “infinite dilution” returns an unbelievable 229,000 hits (search made on June 7th, 2015), and among these, numerous articles that support the principle of an asymptote solute in infinite dilution. Asymptote means approaching but never reaching zero, i.e., due to particle splitting of a solute in aqueous suspension, the concentration of solute ions will approach but never reach zero, no matter how many dilutions are made!

How is it then that skeptical opinion by professional organizations, engaging the media against homeopathy, can deny what is an orthodox explanation of FDA labeled “homeopathic” pharmaceuticals by modern classical claassical chemistry? They will volley to the end that a belief in homeopathy is delusional, when in fact the scientific principal of the properties of solutes remaining in infinite dilution is a well established fact, to be found online in the literature.

“It may sound like something out of a science fiction movie, but infinite dilution is a concept found in chemistry that is applied to the study of solvents — liquids — and solutes, the substances that are dissolved in solvents. This principle is used to test the properties of solutions and extrapolate or estimate their chemical reactions in varying environments.”
Read more :

What is infinite dilution –
“Infinite dilution means such a large dilution so that when you add more solvent there is no change in concentration.” › Wiki Answers › Categories › Science › Chemistry

“An infinitely dilute solution is one where there is a sufficiently large excess of water that adding any more does not cause any further heat to be absorbed or evolved. … The hydration enthalpy is the enthalpy change when 1 mole of gaseous ions dissolve in sufficient water to give an infinitely dilute solution. Hydration enthalpies are always negative.”

“The law is based on the fact that only a portion of the electrolyte is dissociated into ions at ordinary dilution and completely at infinite dilution.”

PDF: Theory of infinite dilution chemical potential

University of Illinois at Chicago

Fluid Phase Equilibria, 85 (1993) 141-151. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam. 141. Theory of infinite dilution chemical potential. 

A search in PUBMED for articles containing “infinite dilution” brought up a dizzying 620 abstracts.


This one mere fact, expressed as two words: INFINITE DILUTION, exposes this whole cat and mouse game of gotcha antagonism against the practice of homeopathy to be nothing more than ignorant pseudoscience. This is a monumental discovery. Anybody can look it up online and see it for themselves in a plethora of articles on the subject.
If infinite dilution is not a chemical fact that refers to the properties of the solute remaining in the solvent after unlimited serial dilutions, then perhaps one of these self-appointed celebrity spokesmen for science, such as Richard Dawkins, Penn Jillette or James “the Amazing” Randi et al; or caviling professors such as PZ Myers, Edzard Ernst, Joe Schwarc, David Colquhoun or Steven Novella et al can explain to us, in their own pseudoscientific terms, just what it really means.


Why have homeopathic physicians and manufacturers of homeopathic medicine not seized upon this acknowledged principle as an answer to critics who insist homeopathic medicines contain “nothing in them but plain water”? Why isn’t the burgeoning homeopathy industry insisting that homeopathic remedies be redesignated ionized pharmaceuticals?

The mystery of why standard chemistry’s concept of infinite dilution is not applied to the dilution dilemma of homeopathic medicine might at first seem as perplexing as infinite dilution itself. But dwell on it here a little longer and deeper truths emerge.


Due to the momentum gained by an incorrect interpretation of “Avogadros limit,” it will continue to be stated by skeptics, posing as rationalists, that by a process of reduction by dilution, the number of molecules of a solute will be reduced past the asymptote to zero by the 23rd decimal dilution, and this is presented as proof that homeopathic remedies contain none of the ingredient stated on a product labeled “homeopathic” and are therefore fraudulent. But there’s a reason why I italicize the word molecule in the context of Avogadro because this is where skeptic theory for homeopathic remedies having nothing of their labeled materials in them literally falls apart.

First, let’s examine what Avogadros constant, limit or number. Avogadro’s hypothesis as proof of an empty bottle . . is easily rebutted. Avogadro’s number is a constant, the ratio of solute particles to the solvent. It must be for particles, such as ions, not just molecules, in a volume of gas, not water. It doesn’t factor the perpetual production of ions by dissociation.

If a constant such as Avogadro’s, Faraday’s or Henry’s were applied to infinite dilution, it might state that due to repeated expansion and contraction of the ion’s domain within the aqueous host (by enthalpy) and contraction due to dissociation, the number of total ions in solution from the time of complete ionization will remain constant within a sinusoidal range throughout all subsequent dilutions.

The FDA then should address this argument and concern by stating that products registered as “homeopathic remedies” are in reality ionized pharmaceuticals, that they are supramolecular (beyond molecular) and their active constitutuion ionic, not molecular.

Now, this assertion of ionized pharmaceutical calls for a question of assay. How are the properties of the ionized solute detected in what are currently called homeopathic drugs, or remedies? Are there tests, trials or experiments that show the presence of an ionized solute in infinite dilution?

Copeland: “. . the laboratory has proven that the properties of a completely dissociated solution are the sum of all the ions present in the solution. This holds for such properties as conductivity, lowering of the freezing point, refraction equivalent, heat of neutralization, and undoubtedly, for any therapeutic effect possessed by the drug.”

Here then Copeland gives us four physical, non-clinical tests, or assays, from 1909, for ionized pharmaceuticals, tests that promise to separate and identify verum from placebo aliquots of the inert aqueous vehicle:

  1. Conductivity
  2. Freezing point
  3. Refraction equivalent
  4. Heat of neutralization

. . and modern chemistry has given us more; transmission electron microscopy (TEM) gives us a fifth assay that detects the actual presence of ions of the starting materials.

If not yet convinced, any real scientist will put aside his drumroll of ignorance or preconceived notions of what the homepathic remedy is when made aware of the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) test protocol for infinite dilutions:

“Test 4: Infinite Dilution Test. This is a test for consistency in the limiting behavior of GE/(x1x2/RT) and the activity coefficients γ1 and γ2. The percent deviations in both limits are calculated:

In lieu of this newly rediscovered chemistry for the materials used in homeopathy, the FDA should drop the term “homeopathic” and replace it with ionized or ionic as the description for these drugs.

I don’t know how it is that they can fight their way out of this paper bag. They and their secret police now stand accused of pseudoscience, the very thing they accused homeopathy of, and as funny as it is, I don’t know now how it is that they and “skepticism” can be taken seriously anymore.

John Henry Clarke, M.D.

The clinical proof has long been extant. If you really look at the semiological registers, most particularly the FDA recommended literature on the subject, (Dictionary of the Materia Medica by John Henry Clarke, M.D. you will find alternative answers to problems now being addressed almost solely by over-monetized patent medicine, and we all know, or should know, what a disaster it has been.

Death by Medicine

Although I am quite aware of the denials that will follow, with the chemistry of infinite dilution now well established in numerous explanations online, it is time to bring this existing, second, more humane pharmacopoeia of inexpensive, time tested, well documented, FDA sanctioned, effective medical materials out of the shadows into the real world of real medicine. This begins with the FDA recognizing what these materials called “homeopathic remedies” really are: IONIZED PHARMACEUTICALS.


If you don’t believe that properties of the solute remain in solvents diluted beyond the putative limit . . make the assays for ionic concentration, i.e. do the tests to identify homeopathic remedies from plain water!

PUT IT TO THE TEST! (James Randi, get your wallet out)

Test question: What are the assays for ionized pharmaceuticals?


Trump or Pharma Public Enemy #1?

10/19/2015 BC Solomon Islands – I really don’t understand why more people aren’t complaining more about the lack of a date stamp on web articles, you don’t know if you’re reading something done yesterday or sometime prior to the Anthropocene era.

Besides my good friend Donald Trump, who I like very much, and the Republican Party gangbanging Hillary until they got run off by Bernie Sanders, the big news this year to date was the Ebola Scare, the Big Bad Ebola virus, a West African hemorrrhagic fever, which I reported that FDA regulated, proven and approved cures using hydrolysis ionized pharmaceuticals could be used to trigger the humoral immune system to c ure Ebola.

I was proven right. The results in a Liberian bed were sudden and dramatic, as is common using supramolecular medicine.

Remember all that? And I just love the look on Don’s face when he was getting the business from O’Reilly after the crowd roared for “that grumpy old socialist” during the Democratic debate last Tuesday night (10/13/15).
You remember if you were watching.
Prior to taking her hand, an avuncular Senator Sanders said almost reproachfully, “Let me say something . . it may not be great politics . . ”
Yes? We all leaned forward a tad. What is it?
He faced Mrs. Clinton like a Trick or Treater at the door on a cold night. “I think the Secretary is right,” he said.
“And that is the American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails!”

The crowd burst forth with a cheer like dams dominoing in a flood. It struck upon the hillside, it rebounded on the flat, for Sanders, Bernie Sanders, was advancing towards the bat.
A broad smile broke upon Madame Secretary’s face, and she began to gush adoringly, “Me two! Me two!” she cried, (the subtext running “You one! You one!”)
Over her laughter and the crowd’s cheering he then astutely, if not magically, segues into his politically supernatural pitch.

“Let me say something about the media as well,” he a said, “I go round the country, talk to a whole lot of people . . the middle class in this country is collapsing. We have 27 million people living in poverty, we have massive wealth and income inequality, our trade policies have cost us millions of decent jobs, the American people want to know if we’re going to have a democracy, or an oligarchy as a result of Citizen’s United. Enough of the emails! Let’s talk about the real issues facing America!”
The crowd stood up and cheered for more than a quarter of an hour and sometime into the next century.

I trust this is kept in the context of what is going on down the hall in the Republican debates, where they are being driven by name calling and who we have to bomb next.

The next day, Wednesday, a subdued Trump was interviewed by Bill O’Reilly. I never seen Don like that, not even when he was losing to me and Bill Clinton at golf. It was as if for the first time in his life he met a mob that was prepared to tear him limb from limb and hang him upside down from his testicles, like they did to Benito Mussolini.

Il Duce.

Just as O’Reilly was signing him off, you could see this flash of terror leap from Trump’s face. For the first time I think he had a flash of what might be laying in wait for him in the future.
But as a medical partisan minority, the most votive feature for me was to hear Sanders elect the pharmaceutical industry as Public Enemy Number One.

Or was it they him?

Before an audience the next day Trump was desperately yelling, “He’s a maniac! He’s a maniac!” I fully expected him to complete the sentence with “because I’m Public Enemy Number One! See? It’s me. Not the pharmaceutical industry, but me, I’m the one, I’m Public Enemy Number One!. .” but he had gone fetal.

Hey, I kid the guy! But it’s true. The difference I have with Senator Trotsky is that it’s not really the fault of the pharmaceutical industry that over 100,000 in the U.S. die each year from properly prescribed and properly administered pharmaceuticals, simply because they’re just what the doctor ordered. You can’t blame the doctor, he’s just responding to popular demand. You can’t blame the customer, he’s just doing what he was told to do on TV; you can’t blame the TV, it’s just playing the ad for the pharmaceutical manufacturers; and you can’t blame the pharmaceutical manufacturers, they’re simply carrying out the mandate of their stockholders, who could be anyone and everyone.

No, in the glare of the hydrolytes of the new curative pharmacology, there’s no one to blame but ourselves.

Subscribe for more . . .

The Worst Argument for Atheism

This foul mouthed, expletive sputtering young man once again makes the usual connection between atheism and the relentless trolling attacks on curative medicine.

Kulinski’s Mouth

Kyle Kulinski isn’t giving us the best argument for atheism, he’s giving us the worst, he’s giving us the usual atheist knee jerk “ontology” for what ironically amounts to a sweltering pig hiding in the shadows of syndicalism. “If alternative medicine was really medicine it wouldn’t be called alternative.” Now there’s a strawman argument for patent medicine genocide. “Alternative” is HIS definition for anything that doesn’t fit the monetized health scare cookie cutter.
“Homeopathy’s a sham,” he says, when in fact Kulinski doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Homeopathy is a long and widely observed principle of immunology. But not wide enough, andpsimon3 2010_05_01_16_12_21 001 apparently not long enough either.. The smallpox vaccine, man’s greatest medical achievement, was, by strict definition of the word, homeopathic.
So here, Kulinski’s atheism, as always, blows up in his face. In reality atheism always leads to pseudoscience . . like Democritus’ Atomic Theory, the only “scientific” delusion of the ancient world to belly crawl into modern (secular) thinking, totally dependent on empty spaces between indivisble particles swimming around in . . what was it again? Empty space? What is this wind again, and where does it come from? Kulinski’s mouth. And what is this vacuum, and where does it reside? Kulinski’s brain.
Watch him. He’s climbed so high in this tree he’ll never come out of it by his own volition, he’ll fall out of it first.