The Worst Argument for Atheism

This foul mouthed, expletive sputtering young man once again makes the usual connection between atheism and the relentless trolling attacks on curative medicine.

Kulinski’s Mouth

Kyle Kulinski isn’t giving us the best argument for atheism, he’s giving us the worst, he’s giving us the usual atheist knee jerk “ontology” for what ironically amounts to a sweltering pig hiding in the shadows of syndicalism. “If alternative medicine was really medicine it wouldn’t be called alternative.” Now there’s a strawman argument for patent medicine genocide. “Alternative” is HIS definition for anything that doesn’t fit the monetized health scare cookie cutter.
“Homeopathy’s a sham,” he says, when in fact Kulinski doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Homeopathy is a long and widely observed principle of immunology. But not wide enough, andpsimon3 2010_05_01_16_12_21 001 apparently not long enough either.. The smallpox vaccine, man’s greatest medical achievement, was, by strict definition of the word, homeopathic.
So here, Kulinski’s atheism, as always, blows up in his face. In reality atheism always leads to pseudoscience . . like Democritus’ Atomic Theory, the only “scientific” delusion of the ancient world to belly crawl into modern (secular) thinking, totally dependent on empty spaces between indivisble particles swimming around in . . what was it again? Empty space? What is this wind again, and where does it come from? Kulinski’s mouth. And what is this vacuum, and where does it reside? Kulinski’s brain.
Watch him. He’s climbed so high in this tree he’ll never come out of it by his own volition, he’ll fall out of it first.



My father, 89, an active man with a razor sharp mind, has been my chief sponsor and bottle washer. Yes, this is the same man who interrupted my boyhood pastimes, collared me and strapped me to a high chair to give me a sharp haircut, much in the same way the shepherd collars the lamb in the crook of his staff for shearing or offering to the Gods. I never was sure of which, as Genesis 22 was dad’s favorite passage to quote when I was bad, excluding the part where Jehovah interrupts Abraham’s pending infanticide to say “don’t kill the boy, I was just kidding.”

I would try to hide in places never visited by human eyes, but he would always find me out, hook me and drag me flailing in a death struggle to bind me to The Chair.

Perhaps this was a replay, because last night he continued this occupation of hunting me down, this time with a phone call, to inquire what the hell was my last blog about.

“Was this the great inspiration you were talking about at McDonald’s today?”
“Well, not exactly, I posted it before I. . ”
“I thought you said you were going to change the face of medicine.”
“Well . . I . . not me . . I”
“I’d dump it if I were you,” he said. “I couldn’t tell who or what you were talking about.”

I had to silently agree with him that it was problematic, but there comes a time when a boy becomes a man and keeps his own mind and tonsure. So, I had to disagree with him that it was final, and not just for the pharmaceutical industry.

Not to ruin it for everybody, but that blog was just the inhaling part of a blast on a predictable material phase change in modern pharmaceuticals.

In my last blog, The Death Knell of Chemo Medicine, I am trying to prepare for the mere possibility that, at least where water is involved, there is no such thing as a simple chemical reaction that is electromagnetically void, free of subsequent supramolecular effects.

Everything has a buzz to it, but especially the cold plasma we know as water. This nails it. By more than my account water is known as the primordial energy absorber, and as such, it is the Great Transducer, as it absorbs energy, most notably the background radiation, water emits energy.

Water emits a converted signal.

We can all see it in the reflection of a puddle or a pool, light being a very narrow part of the electromagnetic spectrum. But it does not necessarily reflect the same signal it absorbs. Water has a tetrahedral molecular shape similar to glass, and as such it might be expected to have qualities similar to glass, molten and frozen.  So water acts as a lens, and this lensing action is not confined to warping visible light.

Solutes, guest molecules in an aqueous host solution, will cause structural changes in water that can be detected spectrographically, changes that can be detected in serial dilutions beyond theoretical mole limits, such as those used in homeopathy.

The current model for the action of the ionized pharmaceuticals used in homoeopathy is a corollary to tritium oxide, which is 3H2O, or radioactive water. The strength of the signal is from enthalpy (induced heat), which is created in the succussion phase of manufacture.

Just as the radiation from an atomic bomb blast will vitrify (convert into glass) materials such as soil, the electromagnetic radiation passing through water from solutes and external sources, such as sunlight, will cause structural changes in water that will continue to resonate and radiate the specified signals long after the instigators have absquatulated . .  or been turned off.

According to a University of London computer modelling post grad, drug companies are ignoring the ramifications of aqueous structuring around the company’s synthesized molecules and the inevitable biologically relevant electromagnetic effects.

The following mind bomb was posted in Jerome Burne’s blog BODY OF EVIDENCE by Jazz Rasool:

One stunning bit of research for simply validating the mechanism of homoeopathy that few people dare to embark on is to use the computer modelling of drug molecules prior to being approved for clinical trials. Many drug companies and universities heavily fund computer simulations of drug behaviour.
 Some modelling looks at whether a drug binds properly to the molecules it must interact with in the body. Another kind of modelling, a ‘Solvation Study’ typically surrounds a drug molecule with a cluster of water molecules to simulate the mostly water environment they may encounter in the human body. Pressure, temperature etc are altered and the water molecules start to move around based on Quantum Physics simulations. Some of them bash against the drug molecule deforming it. If the drug is stable enough it will return to its starting shape or not deform too much and if that is the case the drug is probably suitable for going to real drug trials. If the molecule is unstable then bits will break off which is not good as those might go on to cause side effects and in that instance the drug company won’t bother with a drug trial if the side effects are deemed too risky.
 I know these things because I did such simulations as part of my Masters degree in Computer Modelling of Molecular and Biological Processes at Birkbeck College in the University of London. One glaring issue I had with such studies was how all the focus was on the drug molecule and how the water molecules affected its shape and function rather than any attention be paid to the drug molecules effect on the shape and function of the cluster of water molecules. Water molecules typically can cluster around the drug molecule and can sometimes drift away intact in their joined up architecture that has within it an imprint of the drug molecule. This ‘imprint’ of the drug molecule within the water cluster means that the water cluster, from a biochemical point of view, is a negative or ‘antidote’ to the original drug’s actions. Of course Homoeopaths will tell you that’s exactly what homoeopathic remedies often behave like – with behaviour opposite to the substance from which they were formed from.
 For some bizarre reason drug companies across the world and researchers in universities almost universally ignore how the water molecules glue together into forms that can have their own biochemical effect. Randomised trials are not the place to start for evaluating efficacy of Homoeopathy -the place to start is with basic research that can be done on a computer at a university and, with ever more powerful home computers, something that can even be done by an amateur scientist at home.

 This is an explosion in the face of the pharmaceutical industry’s chemical engineers, for as is known, structural clustering of the aqueous vehicle is the primordial vehicle and cause for the redox and ionization of materials used as medicine in homeopathy, something that homeopathy haters stridently insist isn’t supposed to happen if they are to sustain accusations of implausibility and placebo.

This is further testament to the fact that homeopathic medicine is based on currently observed and explainable physics that are not exclusive to homeopathy.

So pardon me while I laugh long and hard. We homeopaths have been maligned for two centuries, and now suddenly who’s disovered practicing accidental homeopathy. Oh Hippocrates, I have to stop typing so I can wipe my eyes and dab the keyboard . .

Anyone can see what’s going on here. The industrial pharmaceutical arts can’t explain homoeopathy because it’s not in their interest to explain homeopathy. But in not recognizing the biomagnetic effects of the chemistry involved in synthesizing unstable molecules for patenting, they’re running into inescapable physics made cryptic to them by their own denials, whilst their products transmogrify into deadly wildcards.

Make a lot of money boys, you’re going to need it. Homeopathy will find you out and it will bind you to The Chair . .


” . . drug companies across the world and researchers in universities almost universally ignore how the water molecules glue together into forms that can have their own biochemical effect. “ Jazz Rasool



 Follow JBennethJournal on Twitter


 Here’s what happened to Heel’s “huge discovery’ in the ‘natural treatment’ of Alzheimer’s.

DISCLAIMERS: This is not intended as medical advice or a promotion for any product of any kind. If you have a physical or mental problem, consult an appropriate health practitioner or medical doctor.  At the time of this writing the author has no conflict of interest and no financial interests, or contact with Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH, Heel, their holding company, or the owner, inventors agents or employees of or for the aforementioned companies.

Sunday 092213: The Atlantic Black Star reported today ‘a huge discovery’ in the ‘natural treatment’ of Alzheimer’s disease. The story, the Star says, was “recently reported at the Neuroscience Conference in Washington.”

However, a Google search shows that the neuroscience conference referenced by the Star was almost two years ago. In a November 23rd, 2011 Business Wire (BW) press release, BW reports “Heel presented latest studies on a multitarget medication based on low dose natural substances that has proven to positively influence both symptoms as well as disease-related mechanisms of Alzheimer’s.” The press release doesn’t say what the multitarget medication is, either by brand or wha the ‘natural’ content is.

Dr. Bernd Seilheimer of Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH (Heel) made the presentation at the neuroscience conference. Seilheimer is one of the medicine’s two inventors.  Heel is a producer of low dose natural substances as used in “homeopathic mixology,” the use of composite homeopathic remedies, or compounds, for a specified clinical condition instead of a single remedy for a pattern of symptoms.

BW quotes Seilheimer as saying, “We are fascinated by the results. This homeopathically prepared medication leads to significant changes in the gene networks associated with synaptic function and plasticity. It significantly reduces the gene expression of APP and BACE, responsible for the formation of β-amyloid plaques which hallmark Alzheimer’s disease. Upon treatment, axons of neurons even grew faster and longer than under saline control conditions.”

Heel is a corporation that produces supramolecular* hydrate pharmaceuticals used by medical practitioners homeopathically. Previously referred to as “homeopathic remedies” the pharmaceuticals used in homeopathic medicine have recently been chemically identified as supramolecular hydrate pharmaceuticals.

The 2011 BW release reported that electroencephalographic (EEG) studies indicated strong effects on cognitive functions by a mix of several natural substances in low doses.
“No preventive or curative therapy is available today,” BW said. “The few drugs that have been approved by regulatory agencies offer only a small symptomatic benefit.”

According to Seilheimer, “All studies have confirmed our earlier observations: this medication has proven to enhance the learning and memory performance in a dose-dependent fashion. It showed at least as effective as the Gold Standard at all tested behavioral models. In addition, it is very well-tolerated. No negative side-effects could be documented with the natural preparation. Following the new paradigm, multitarget preparations could become a natural alternative to conventional preparations for treating complex diseases such as Alzheimer’s.”

“Alzheimer’s is a multi-factorial disease,” he said. “This calls for a change in the therapeutic paradigm towards a multitarget approach.”

BW noted Seilheimer was the 2011 Head of Bioregulatory Development at Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH in Baden-Baden, Germany).

A search was then conducted on PUBMED to find what published studies there might be that could corroborate the story that Heel had developed a homeopathic compound for the treatment for Alzheimer‘s Disease. None were found. However, PUBMED shows that in 2012 Seilheimer co authored “Effect of Neurexan on the pattern of EEG frequencies in rats,” published by BMC Complement Altern Med.

The “Neurexan” study was for “a multicomponent, low-dose medication” produced by Heel for sleep disorders. No mentioned of a use for Neurexan for Alzheimer’s was made.

A patent search made on the World Property Organization (WIPO) headquartered in Switzerland revealed a patent filed on May 21, 2013 by two German inventors. The patent application reads: “Title of the invention: “COMPOSITION FOR TREATING OR PREVENTING NEURODEGENERATIVE DISORDERS.” Applicants: BIOLOGISCHE HEILMITTEL HEEL GMBH (DE), Bernd Seilheimer (DE) and Kerstin Roska (DE). It lists Seilheimer and Roska as the inventors of the composition: Bernd Seilheimer (DE) and Kerstin Roska (DE).

According to the abstract posted by the World Intellectual Property Organization:

“The present invention is concerned with plant derived pharmaceutically useful compositions. In particular, it relates to a composition for use in treating and/or preventing a neurodegenerative disorder or disease, wherein said composition comprises extracts of Conium … ”


It seems as if Heel is planning to roll out of a new patented homeopathic Alzheimer’s medicine. But there’s a critical problem with this. It is not in Heel’s formula, nor is it in its patenting of homeopathic preparations, nor is it in Heel’s marketing of a homeopathic product to conventional MD’s. These are all good things, these are all positive approaches in Heel‘s unique presentation of homeopathic products.
The problem is that with jealousies and the war of the lancets between allopathy and homeopathy aside, in order for the medical materials used in homeopathy to gain acceptance in mainstream medicine, their physico-chemistry must first be scientifically understood.

Given the expanding data base and growing acceptance in the material sciences of the supramolecular nature of ultra dilute homeopathic medicine, conventional scientific explanations are now becoming available to practitioners and the homeopathic pharmaceutical industry.

Heel  was founded in 1936 by Hans-Heinrich Reckeweg. The company has offices in 40 countries worldwide including the United States where it is located in Albuquerque, NM. Heel is a subsidiary of DELTON AG, a holding company headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany. Its Pharmaceuticals and Logistics divisions manage the value-creating investment and entrepreneurial activities of its sole shareholder Stefan Quandt.

Of all the present producers of homeopathic medicines, Heel now appears is the most capably situated in the market to present to mainstream medical professionals what the action and physico-chemical distinctions of the supramolecular materials used in homeopathy.

~ ~ ~

 *The identitification of the chemistry of homeopathic medicine as “supramolecular” was first made by John Benneth at Cambridge’s Cavendish Laboratory on Oct. 1, 2010  in a talk entitled “The Supramolecular Chemistry of the Homeopathic Remedy.”

See John Benneth’s milestone 2010 presentation at the Cavendish Laboratory “Beyond the Molecule: The Supramolecular Chemistry of the Homeopathic Remedy”  Power Point Presentation at Audio

SUBSCRIBE NOW to the JOHN BENNETH JOURNAL, and be alerted of new and interesting developments in curative and spiritual medicine.