ENCOURAGEMENT
No one needs to get fired, no one has to get angry and no one needs to be sad. Homeopathy has something for everyone, especially those who think homeopathy is a scam, the Atheists who have been second in the denial of it only to Anglo-American medical professionals (the Europeans and Indians love it)
Homeopathy in intensive care has cut septic shock deaths in half, but Anglo-American docs scoff despite their high death rates. For homeopathic treament of sepsis see Frass M., Bundner M. Homeopathy in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, 535 pages
But this can change. Atheists hate homeopathy because they worship science, and not knowing the science behind it they thinkthe pharmacy is inert. They think the solute molecule disappears due to dilution, when in fact it is “quantumized,” ionized into plasma by dissociation into the diluent as a perpetuating entangled wave.
Some people just need to shut up about homeopathy until they learn more about it and it’s actual chemistry . . how and what makes it work.
A reasonable question to ask is how is it that there can be a highly advanced 200 year old curative chemistry and such vituperative theories against it by people who know so little about it?
Why are some doctors reporting its use to cure sepsis when all else fails, and others suppressing its use?
It’s like astrology, but much more threatening to the actual pseudoscientist: The denial of it is a projection of pseudoscience made by arrogant, lazy, narcissistic, purposely ignorant people who, when faced with a dynamic data set they won’t quite get their heads around, hide behind a facade of what they call science.
DR. PAUL MORGAN, intensivist and lead sepsis consultant at Cardiff University Hospital, Wales, is vehemently opposed to homeopathy, posting over 122,000 tweets on Twitter harassing homeopaths for “evidence.”
To really understand homeopathy you have to understand what the word does and does not mean and take the evidence of its action seriously. Too often its taken to be synonymous with herbal medicine. While it does, among other things animal and mineral, make use of ionized extracts from vegetable sources, it’s much more than than that. But before we go any further, it should be pointed out that proof for homeopathy is iron clad: Homeopathy as a doctrine and homeopathy as a distinct, separate pharmacy (and the overwhelming amount of literature supporting its use) are sanctioned in and by law. If this was better known and understood the contention over it would be over . . in court, and perhaps the war against homeopaths, the interference with trade, solicitations of malice, disinformation and libel would come to an end.
THE LAW
The U.S. Food Drug and Cosmetic Act regulates and protects homeopathy and the use of its pharmaceuticals by statute.
The following is a killshot on any mouth-bubbling argument by pathological “scientists” who think homeopathic medicines are inert:
CPG Sec. 400.400 Conditions Under Which Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed
“Section 201(g)(1) of the Act defines the term “drug” to mean articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopeia (USP), the official Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States (HPUS), or official National Formulary (NF) or any supplement to them; and articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or the prevention of disease in man or other animals; articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals; and articles intended for use as a component of any articles specified in the above. Whether or not they are official homeopathic remedies, those products offered for the cure, mitigation, prevention, or treatment of disease conditions are regarded as drugs within the meaning of Section 201(g)(l) of the Act.
“Homeopathic drugs generally must meet the standards for strength, quality, and purity set forth in the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia. Section 501(b) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 351) provides in relevant part:
“Whenever a drug is recognized in both the United States Pharmacopeia and the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States it shall be subject to the requirements of the United States Pharmacopeia unless it is labeled and offered for sale as a homeopathic drug, in which case it shall be subject to the provisions of the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States and not to those of the United States Pharmacopeia.
“A product’s compliance with requirements of the HPUS, USP, or NF does not establish that it has been shown by appropriate means to be safe, effective, and not misbranded for its intended use.
“A guide to the use of homeopathic drugs (including potencies, dosing, and other parameters) may be found by referring to the following texts: A Dictionary of Practical Materia Medica by John Henry Clarke, M.D., (3 volumes; Health Science Press) and A Clinical Repertory to the Dictionary of Materia Medica by John Henry Clarke, M.D. (Health Science Press). These references must be reviewed in conjunction with other available literature on these drug substances.” for whole statute click here
- Thus ends the “homeopathy is a scam” claim;
- It establishes homeopathic remedies as legal drugs;
- It endorses a primary reference work and preeminent authority (Clarke)
Perhaps it would serve honest inquiry to explore Clarke. Why does the U.S. FDCA make this reference?
The John Benneth Journal 