Homeopathy and the Physics of Enchantment: The Supramolecular Vaccine

A great discovery is exposed . .

THE BIG DUMMY’S BOOK OF:
Electrical Engineering for the Immune System
by John R. Benneth

Here’s correspondence received from a reader of the previous blog, where I make the assertion that the immune trigger in the modern conventional vaccine is the electron, not the currently presumed molecule of the unrefined modern vaccine, and that the current vaccines can be made safer and more effective by dissociation of the morbid vaccine molecule, proven to be superior in their use by homeopathic physicians.

drgsrinivas writess:

“Mr Bennett, there is a hell of difference between vaccines and homeopathic remedies. If pioneers like you argue that homeopathic remedies work similar to vaccines, no wonder why homeopathy looses in scientific discussions.

“And despite all such misconceptions and misunderstanding amongst the homeopathic community about homeopathy, it is still working. So it must be really a wonderful medicine!”

johnbenneth writess:

You’re simply echoing what popular science, driven by the molecular drug industry, wants you to believe, that “homeopathic remedies” are inert, that they have no active ingredients. The fact is lab tests show they can cause dramatic biochemical reactions. Specifically they show that the “immunogen” is the electron, not the molecule.
Keep reading the literature. Define “molecular dissociation.”

When a molecule is dissociated by the process of dilution and succession, it is stripped of its mass and reduced to its constituate electrons, its signal, the immune trigger, increases exponentially, and thus requires no aggravating adjuvants or preservatives, hence a toxin free, pure vaccine.

The operative phase of inoculation, such as found in the modern “vaccine,” is not the molecule, it is the electron. It is possible to peel away the electron from the molecule mass from the common vaccine, stripping away its unnecessary, dangerous elements, leaving nothing but the pure electrical signal of the solute and a safe, more facile prophylaxis (disease prevention).

And please allow me to note once again “vaccine” is not a proper word for disease prevention (prophylaxis) other than the morbid cowpox serum used for the prevention of variola (smallpox). The word vaccine literally means from cattle, so it is misapplied when addressing whooping cough, the measles or cancer. There’s no safe molecular “vaccine” for whooping cough, measles or cancer, but there is now FDA sanctioned supramolecular prophylaxis for whooping cough, measles and ot5her infectious diseases..

Supramolecular here refers to the fourth contiguous phase of matter: Ions, plasma, essentially the electron.
Actinic here refers to biochemical changes produced by spectral energy.

Now get this, this is crazy: This is a question I punted into Google: How do “vaccines” immunize?
Here’s what I take to be the answer from conventional settled science via the US government’s Center for Disease Control:

How do vaccines give immunity?
Vaccines help develop immunity by imitating an infection. This type of infection, however, does not cause illness, but it does cause the immune system to produce T-lymphocytes and antibodies. Sometimes, after getting a vaccine, the imitation infection can cause minor symptoms, such as fever.
Understanding How Vaccines Work

Click to access vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf

Q: The CDC says “vaccines” help develop immunity by imitating an infection?

It would be what one might call vaccine fallout.  People who receive live-virus vaccines, such as the MMR, can then shed that live virus, for up to many weeks and can infect others.  Other live-virus vaccines include the nasal flu vaccine, shingles vaccine, rotavirus vaccine, chicken pox vaccine, and yellow fever vaccine.”

A: I beg your pardon for exposing more pathological skepticism masquerading as science and rocking the medical Titanic, but the stated recognition that vaccines help develop immunity by imitating an infection stumbles over a contradiction, a huge medical incongruity: it is one of two reasons for rejecting homeopathy, a long practiced medical tradition. Creating immunity from any particular disease by staging an imitation of that disease is the primary strategy of homeopathy, of like cures like in treating not just infectious diseases, but a wide range of human problems, such as those caused by emotional stress, like peptic ulcers, infection and toxicity. The broad application of pathological similitude to treat a wide variety of human, animal and even plant, i.e. biological afflictions is on one count why for over 200 years homeopathy has been banned by standard medical practice.

So this is really an odd conundrum. On one hand, according to the CDC, the use of artificial imitative diseases in countervaling similitude is the only alllopathic strategy for conveying immunity. On the other hand, its use as putative homeopathy is rejected. It would appear that one hand is ignorant of the other.

What is it we’re not seeing here?

Homeopathy and the Physics of Enchantment

Homeopathy and the Physics of Enchantment

by John R. Benneth, PG Homeopathy – London (Hons.)

CHAPTER ONE

The Supramolecular Vaccine 10.28.18

  • Announcing a breakthrough in immunology that has the potential to revolutionize medicine: The ionized pharmaceutical
  • Supramolecular here refers to the fourth contiguous phase of matter: Ions, plasma, and the electron.
    Actinic here refers to biochemical changes produced by radiant energy.
  • Enchantment here refers to the physics of change.

 

The fundamental revelatory theme driving this thesis is that the electron is actinic*, is a fractal and is what gives the molecule its specificity, properties of action and chain reactions.

*radiant energy causing biochemical reactions ,such as basophil degranulation. 

Here’s a question I punted into Google: How do vaccines immunize?
Here’s what I take to be the answer from conventional settled science via the US government’s Center for Disease Control:

How do vaccines give immunity?

“Vaccines help develop immunity by imitating an infection. This type of infection, however, does not cause illness, but it does cause the immune system to produce T-lymphocytes and antibodies. Sometimes, after getting a vaccine, the imitation infection can cause minor symptoms, such as fever.” – Understanding How Vaccines Work, Center for Disease Control
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/…/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf

Vaccines help develop immunity by imitating an infection?
I beg your pardon for raising an objection and rocking the medical Titanic, but the stated recognition that vaccines help develop immunity by imitating an infection stumbles over a contradiction, a huge medical incongruity: it is one of two reasons for rejecting homeopathy, a long practiced medical tradition.

Creating immunity from any particular disease by staging an imitation of that disease is the primary strategy of homeopathy in treating not just infectious diseases, but a wide range of human problems, such as those caused by emotional stress, (like peptic ulcers) infection and toxicity from chemical and interpersonal sources. The broad application of pathological similitude to treat a wide variety of human, animal and even plant, i.e. biological afflictions, is on one count why for over 200 years homeopathy has been banned from standard medical practice.

So this is really an odd conundrum. On one hand, according to the CDC, the use of artificial imitative diseases, i.e. pathological similitude, is the only strategy for conveying immunity. On the other hand, its use is rejected by mainstream “medical” opinion . . per se..

It would appear that one hand is ignorant of the other.

A 27-year-old meta-analysis (systematic review) of homeopathy studies published in the British Medical Journal by Kleijnen et al says: “The amount of positive evidence even among the best studies came as a surprise to us. Based on this evidence we would be ready to accept that homeopathy can be efficacious, if only the mechanism of action were more plausible.” (BMJ, Kleijnen, 1991, p. 321)

EXOSKELETAL DEMANDS

Given the disbelief and squalling that surrounds homeopathy, which (according to the Washington Post) has the greatest amount of contention over any subject discussed in the Western world; with the exception of Christ, such an endorsement made by such a prestigious medical journal as the BMJ regarding the world’s only comprehensive precipitating pharmacy of cure would lead one to think that modern science within three decades would have plumbed its so-called “mechanism,” and with apologies to the persecuted Craft, kindly brought this orphaned doctrine of medicine into the conventional family of sciences.

But this has not been the case.

As I earlier implied while presenting the magnum of pathological similitude of the common vaccine, there is a second count of putative inscrutability against homeopathy, buoyed along by what masks itself as “settled science”. . and this is the failure of that stubbornly dogmatic “settled science,” to identify the phase shift in the solute and the tritiation [hydrogen potentization]  of the solvent in homeopathic pharmaceuticals.

With the exception of Rolland Conte, his team and myself, I have seen no real attempt to conventionalize homeopathy by attaching a handle on it from traditional physics or chemistry, when in fact recognized physico-chemical terms and tests exist that define and demonstrate what the homeopathic pharmacy is, what processes create it and how it works.

Throwing one of these ‘little’ sentences into an argument over whether homeopathy has a real chemistry to it or not is like throwing a stick of dynamite into an open fire . . and if you are a student of homeopathy you are now free to imagine the results: It blows open the door to a whole new line of supramolecular prophylaxis, supramolecular meaning ‘beyond the molecule’, prophylaxis meaning ‘action taken to prevent a disease’.”

This then is the purpose of this paper, to reveal to the world the Second Evolution of Prophylaxis, the clean, lean, energetic vaccine, the strength of the homeopathic remedy.

NEXT: A great discovery is exposed

 

 

MEASLES: The FDA recommended non-toxic vaccine

There can’t be any hotter ticket than this, our new immunology featuring the newly discovered chemistry of the supramolecular “vaccine”> prophylaxis*, and the Old Guard will revolt to protect their own interest. But before any recommendations can be made, we have to put forward the ground rules under which the Federal Drug Administration is empowered to operate within the Federal Drug and Cosmetic Act  (FDCA) as both encouragement and caution.

The FDCA recommended nox-toxic prophylaxis for the Measles is supramolecular Morbillinum. Supramolecular means its effective operation is “beyond the molecule” in the transitory energetic plasma phase of the pathogen’s immunity trigger,  made so by the hydrolytic ion extraction of the pathogenic germ so as to avoid the use of long term complications of permanently embedded molecular germs and adjuvants of the old “dirty” molecular “vaccines.”

Here are the FDA restrictions regarding recommendations for traditional use of Morbillinum and other supramolecular prophylaxis “vaccines” as provided by the Compliance Policy Guides of the FDCA under the guidance of Sen. Royal Copeland, Chief Sponsor of the Act.

CPG Sec. 400.400 Conditions Under Which Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed

“A product’s compliance with requirements of the HPUS, USP, or NF does not establish that it has been shown by appropriate means to be safe, effective, and not misbranded for its intended use.

“A guide to the use of homeopathic drugs (including potencies, dosing, and other parameters) may be found by referring to the following texts: A Dictionary of Practical Materia Medica by John Henry Clarke, M.D., (3 volumes; Health Science Press) and A Clinical Repertory to the Dictionary of Materia Medica by John Henry Clarke, M.D. (Health Science Press). These references must be reviewed in conjunction with other available literature on these drug substances.”

More can and should be said, and the reader is invited to join in on the discussion to tease out pro and con. More on product compliance can be found at:

https://www.fda.gov/iceci/compliancemanuals/compliancepolicyguidancemanual/ucm074360.htm

Given that the reader understands the provisions of FDA, let it be said that if you must “vaccinate,” use supramolecular prophylaxis only. We also suggest that supramolecular prophylaxis be tested on non human subjects and administered by licensed practitioners trained in its use only, and that a Federal database be maintained tracking the individual use of supramolecular drugs.

Here is the specific page in the FDA recommended supramolecular treatment of Measles

A DICTIONARY OF PRACTICAL
MATERIA MEDICA
By John Henry CLARKE, M.D.

Morbillinum

Morbillin. The nosode of Measles.

Clinical.─Catarrh. Coryza. Cough. Ear, affections of. Eye, affections of. Measles. Skin, affections of.

Example of supramolecular Morbillinum now available for order online. We suggest it be treated like all molecular vaccines and administered by licensed practitioners only.

Characteristics.─The well-known symptoms which characterise an attack of measles may all be taken as guides for its homœopathic use. Its chief use hitherto has been as a prophylactic against infection, and to clear up after effects of an attack. My own use of it has been confined to the 30th and higher, but there is no bar upon lower potencies, and those who prefer them may begin with the 6th. As a prophylactic given to those who are, or may be, exposed to infection, I prescribe a dose of the 30th twice or thrice daily. For an attack of the disease I find nothing better than Morbil. 30, eight or ten globules in six ounces of water, a dessertspoonful every two hours.─The effect of this is heightened by giving alternately Bell. 30 in the same way. These two medicines will be sufficient to carry through any uncomplicated case, and in my experience do even better than Pulsatilla. As the measles poison has a great affinity for the mucous passages, the eyes, the ears and the respiratory mucous membranes, Morbil. may be used in such cases like any other homœopathic remedy, when the symptoms correspond.

Relations.─Complementary: Bell. Compare: Puls., Hep., Merc., Sul.

*vaccine, meaning from cattle, is a misnomer for prophylaxis, meaning prevention of infection, insemination or pregnancy

Supramolecular inoculation of Measles and other diseases

Supramolecular means “beyond the molecule” and here refers to the molecular dissociated solutes used in homeopathic medicine.

I pulled up on Twitter another outbreak of pathological skepticism today. These people are crying for a law to make Measles vaccinations mandatory. Yesterday they wanted to prosecute hydrolytic homeopathy for being against the law, today they want to stab you with a needle that pumps you full of their dirty molecular vaccine . . and make it law.

Given that to be forewarned is to be forearmed, let me first post a caveat about getting involved, this is an unusually contentious subject. The reputations of those who present this information publicly are always attacked. So I thought it would be appropriate today to flip that. There’s no need to force people to take common molecular vaccines as long as we have supramolecular prophylaxis, which it so happens to be perfectly lawful.

You might ask, “why are we not using it?”

It’s because of a witch hunt by academics, professional “skeptics” and the pharmaceutical companies they serve conducting a pogrom on the FDA sanctioned use of newly identified medical electrolytes, tritiated drugs and radiophamaceuticals, technical names for what have traditionally been used as “homeopathic remedies” for 200 years.

The witch hunters, calling themselves “skeptics” know only what they’re told to know. They don’t know what tritiated immunopharmaceuticals are, and even if they did, they wouldn’t know how to make them or apply them.

Allow me to show you an example of what I’m talking about.

Let’s take the Measles vaccine for example. Measles is more of a problem as a vaccine now than it used to be as a disease. The CDC says “Measles was declared eliminated (absence of continuous disease transmission for greater than 12 months) from the United States in 2000. This was thanks to a highly effective vaccination program in the United States, as well as better measles control in the Americas region.”

Snake bites and lightning strikes now take more lives than the Measles do, and sometimes people still get it anyway . . i.e. having been vaccinated for the Measles, they still get the Measles.

It’s since been discovered that the main cause of measles is malnutrition, specifically vitamin A. In the US, Measles is relatively rare, there’s not much of that deficiency . . in countries where there is a vitamin A deficiency measles is Legion. So that should stop and make us think, maybe the best prophylaxis for Measles is simply vitamin A.

Or would that be too costly?

If this bothers you, read on. It gets worse. Vitamin A isn’t going to save you from the pogrom if you believe in the use of supramolecular medicine to inoculate against epidemic disease, unless . . unless you got a better grip on science than they do and you can tell them what supramolecular prophylaxis is physically and chemically, what it does and how it works and last but not least, who authorized it.

What you need is a command of the literature on electrolytes, molecular dissociation and electron expansion beside a knowledge of physical, botanical, zoological and botanical tests for homeopathy. You also need a command of the laws that govern it, most of which is under your nose right now if you’re reading it off the Internet. Add to this a taste of plasma physics and quantum chemistry for the heavy artillery to back you up.

The hollow science mob will say that anyone who believes in homeopathy shall be regarded as a fraud or a fool. And that anyone who believes that supramolecular prophylaxis is effective is a danger to society. Gun in hand, needle full of their dirty molecular vaccine and your next stroke in the other, current immunology employs an 18th-century model of immunology. But the grip of rationalism loosened around the neck of medical empiricism long enough for one little discovery to escape and start a chain reaction that, as of today, is still going strong. Modern rationalist thinkers, i.e. pathological skeptics, unaware of hydro physics, bet their reputations, careers and large sums of money on that there is nothing in it, a claim repeatedly disproven ad nauseam.

Here’s the FDA’s position the use of the long challenged homeopathy in the supramolecular treatment of measles by John H. Clarke, M.D.

Morbillin. The nosode of Measles.

Successful clinical treatment of Catarrh. Coryza. Cough. Ear, affections of. Eye, affections of. Measles. Skin, affections of.

Characteristics.─The well-known symptoms which characterise an attack of measles may all be taken as guides for its homœopathic use. Its chief use hitherto has been as a prophylactic against infection, and to clear up after effects of an attack. My own use of it has been confined to the 30th and higher, but there is no bar upon lower potencies, and those who prefer them may begin with the 6th. As a prophylactic given to those who are, or may be, exposed to infection, I prescribe a dose of the 30th twice or thrice daily. For an attack of the disease I find nothing better than Morbil. 30, eight or ten globules in six ounces of water, a dessertspoonful every two hours.─The effect of this is heightened by giving alternately Bell. 30 in the same way. These two medicines will be sufficient to carry through any uncomplicated case, and in my experience do even better than Pulsatilla. As the measles poison has a great affinity for the mucous passages, the eyes, the ears and the respiratory mucous membranes, Morbil. may be used in such cases like any other homœopathic remedy, when the symptoms correspond.

Relations.─Complementary: Bell. Compare: Puls., Hep., Merc., Sul.

” -from the FDA recommended Morbillinum in the DICTIONARY OF PRACTICAL MATERIA MEDICA by John Henry CLARKE, M.D. http://homeoint.org/clarke/m/morbil.htm

Let me make a brief observation here. I would say to the man and a few women who are suffering from pathological skepticism, that homeopathy, defined within their repertoire, is never footnoted by the actual literature, which includes the particular statute. Skeptics only quote skeptics, and when confronted by the literature they are ignorant of, will panic, deny it, dismiss it, then return to personally attacking the reporter and his credentials.

Contrary to what opponents of homeopathy would have us believe, the use of homeopathic medicine to counteract epidemic diseases is backed by high authority. Clarke was a medical doctor practicing homeopathy in Piccadilly back in the first half of the 20th century, and is the only medical doctor referenced by name in 400.400 of the Federal Drug and Cosmetics Act governing homeopathy, authored by another medical doctor, Sen. Royal Copeland, MD. of New York, sponsor of the Act. Copeland is notable here, not just as the author of the law that sanctions the use of homeopathic medicine, but also as the first reporter of the theory of how it works. [In my previous entry I posted Copeland’s theory of molecular dissociation as the process for extending the solute throughout infinite dilution.]

It can be truthfully said homeopathic medicines, including Morbillin and homeopathic remedies for other diseases such as mumps, whoopimg cough, smallpox, cancer, just about any disease, named and unnamed, if it’s got symptoms, homeopathy has got a cure for it sanctioned by law in CPG Sec. 400.400 “Conditions Under Which Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed.”

400.400 “A guide to the use of homeopathic drugs (including potencies, dosing, and other parameters) may be found by referring to the following texts: A Dictionary of Practical Materia Medica by John Henry Clarke, M.D., (3 volumes; Health Science Press) and A Clinical Repertory to the Dictionary of Materia Medica by John Henry Clarke, M.D. (Health Science Press). These references must be reviewed in conjunction with other available literature on these drug substances.”

So here is an FDA endorsed piece of the literature by a British medical doctor on what technically could be called homeoprophylaxis, the use of homeopathic pharmaceuticals to cure and inoculate against disease. If there’s any question about the use of the word “cure”, it appears 1,352 times in this three volume semiological register listing the properties and action of 1000 traditional homeopathic remedies, tested and proven in countless thousands of cases by numerous medical doctors http://homeoint.org/clarke/index.htm

Here’s Clarke on Parotidinum, the supramolecular nosode of Mumps.

Clinical.─Glandular affections. Meningitis. Mumps. Orchitis. Salivation.

Characteristics.─Parotidinum has been used as a prophylactic against infection by mumps. In this instance it is generally given in the 6th or 30th two or three times a day to those exposed to infection. In the disease itself it may be given every four hours, either by itself or alternated with other indicated remedies. The well-known complications which sometimes occur with mumps, cerebral inflammation and orchitis suggest its possible use in these conditions.

Relations.─Compare: Merc.

Wikipedia, Rubella- “The molecular basis for the causation of congenital rubella syndrome are not yet completely clear, but in vitro studies with cell lines showed that rubella virus has an apoptotic effect on certain cell types. There is evidence for a 53-dependent mechanism”. Megyeri K, Berencsi K, Halazonetis TD, et al. (June 1999). “Involvement of a p53-dependent pathway in rubella virus-induced apoptosis”. Virology. 259 (1): 74–84.1] I suspect it’s Hungarian

It is superbly ironic, that by their own admission, rubella can act as a homeopathic type treatment for cancer. Frankly, I don’t think the molecular basis for the cause of any disease is clear to present day self-styled authorities, This is because the transmission of disease is not molecular, it is supramolecular, and the placeboites are fourth phase retarded.

I suggest you stay on top of this, share with your friends, and read the next entry if I can manage another.

USE IT.

Hydrolytic note-

Our fundamental working tool here is hydrogen, which I don’t see it as a definable, particle, but rather a phase jumping fractal. I believe it’s a hydrogen vortex of energy that is both local and universal, even trans universal, and this comes from the suggestion that the hydrogen atom is a vortex either coming from or going to another universe . . or phase, and this is attested to by the law of the kosmotrope, which says the smallest entity, which is the kosmotrope, creates order, and the largest, the chaotrope, destroys it. Modern popular science belief rates the electron as a fundamental particle, meaning they believe it has no structure. Its properties however, as seen in the testing and use of supramolecular medicines prove otherwise.

Copyright John Benneth 2018