Homeopathy and the Physics of Enchantment: The Supramolecular Vaccine

A great discovery is exposed . .

Electrical Engineering for the Immune System
by John R. Benneth

Here’s correspondence received from a reader of the previous blog, where I make the assertion that the immune trigger in the modern conventional vaccine is the electron, not the currently presumed molecule of the unrefined modern vaccine, and that the current vaccines can be made safer and more effective by dissociation of the morbid vaccine molecule, proven to be superior in their use by homeopathic physicians.

drgsrinivas writess:

“Mr Bennett, there is a hell of difference between vaccines and homeopathic remedies. If pioneers like you argue that homeopathic remedies work similar to vaccines, no wonder why homeopathy looses in scientific discussions.

“And despite all such misconceptions and misunderstanding amongst the homeopathic community about homeopathy, it is still working. So it must be really a wonderful medicine!”

johnbenneth writess:

You’re simply echoing what popular science, driven by the molecular drug industry, wants you to believe, that “homeopathic remedies” are inert, that they have no active ingredients. The fact is lab tests show they can cause dramatic biochemical reactions. Specifically they show that the “immunogen” is the electron, not the molecule.
Keep reading the literature. Define “molecular dissociation.”

When a molecule is dissociated by the process of dilution and succession, it is stripped of its mass and reduced to its constituate electrons, its signal, the immune trigger, increases exponentially, and thus requires no aggravating adjuvants or preservatives, hence a toxin free, pure vaccine.

The operative phase of inoculation, such as found in the modern “vaccine,” is not the molecule, it is the electron. It is possible to peel away the electron from the molecule mass from the common vaccine, stripping away its unnecessary, dangerous elements, leaving nothing but the pure electrical signal of the solute and a safe, more facile prophylaxis (disease prevention).

And please allow me to note once again “vaccine” is not a proper word for disease prevention (prophylaxis) other than the morbid cowpox serum used for the prevention of variola (smallpox). The word vaccine literally means from cattle, so it is misapplied when addressing whooping cough, the measles or cancer. There’s no safe molecular “vaccine” for whooping cough, measles or cancer, but there is now FDA sanctioned supramolecular prophylaxis for whooping cough, measles and ot5her infectious diseases..

Supramolecular here refers to the fourth contiguous phase of matter: Ions, plasma, essentially the electron.
Actinic here refers to biochemical changes produced by spectral energy.

Now get this, this is crazy: This is a question I punted into Google: How do “vaccines” immunize?
Here’s what I take to be the answer from conventional settled science via the US government’s Center for Disease Control:

How do vaccines give immunity?
Vaccines help develop immunity by imitating an infection. This type of infection, however, does not cause illness, but it does cause the immune system to produce T-lymphocytes and antibodies. Sometimes, after getting a vaccine, the imitation infection can cause minor symptoms, such as fever.
Understanding How Vaccines Work

Click to access vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf

Q: The CDC says “vaccines” help develop immunity by imitating an infection?

It would be what one might call vaccine fallout.  People who receive live-virus vaccines, such as the MMR, can then shed that live virus, for up to many weeks and can infect others.  Other live-virus vaccines include the nasal flu vaccine, shingles vaccine, rotavirus vaccine, chicken pox vaccine, and yellow fever vaccine.”

A: I beg your pardon for exposing more pathological skepticism masquerading as science and rocking the medical Titanic, but the stated recognition that vaccines help develop immunity by imitating an infection stumbles over a contradiction, a huge medical incongruity: it is one of two reasons for rejecting homeopathy, a long practiced medical tradition. Creating immunity from any particular disease by staging an imitation of that disease is the primary strategy of homeopathy, of like cures like in treating not just infectious diseases, but a wide range of human problems, such as those caused by emotional stress, like peptic ulcers, infection and toxicity. The broad application of pathological similitude to treat a wide variety of human, animal and even plant, i.e. biological afflictions is on one count why for over 200 years homeopathy has been banned by standard medical practice.

So this is really an odd conundrum. On one hand, according to the CDC, the use of artificial imitative diseases in countervaling similitude is the only alllopathic strategy for conveying immunity. On the other hand, its use as putative homeopathy is rejected. It would appear that one hand is ignorant of the other.

What is it we’re not seeing here?

Homeopathy and the Physics of Enchantment

Homeopathy and the Physics of Enchantment

by John R. Benneth, PG Homeopathy – London (Hons.)


The Supramolecular Vaccine 10.28.18

  • Announcing a breakthrough in immunology that has the potential to revolutionize medicine: The ionized pharmaceutical
  • Supramolecular here refers to the fourth contiguous phase of matter: Ions, plasma, and the electron.
    Actinic here refers to biochemical changes produced by radiant energy.
  • Enchantment here refers to the physics of change.


The fundamental revelatory theme driving this thesis is that the electron is actinic*, is a fractal and is what gives the molecule its specificity, properties of action and chain reactions.

*radiant energy causing biochemical reactions ,such as basophil degranulation. 

Here’s a question I punted into Google: How do vaccines immunize?
Here’s what I take to be the answer from conventional settled science via the US government’s Center for Disease Control:

How do vaccines give immunity?

“Vaccines help develop immunity by imitating an infection. This type of infection, however, does not cause illness, but it does cause the immune system to produce T-lymphocytes and antibodies. Sometimes, after getting a vaccine, the imitation infection can cause minor symptoms, such as fever.” – Understanding How Vaccines Work, Center for Disease Control

Vaccines help develop immunity by imitating an infection?
I beg your pardon for raising an objection and rocking the medical Titanic, but the stated recognition that vaccines help develop immunity by imitating an infection stumbles over a contradiction, a huge medical incongruity: it is one of two reasons for rejecting homeopathy, a long practiced medical tradition.

Creating immunity from any particular disease by staging an imitation of that disease is the primary strategy of homeopathy in treating not just infectious diseases, but a wide range of human problems, such as those caused by emotional stress, (like peptic ulcers) infection and toxicity from chemical and interpersonal sources. The broad application of pathological similitude to treat a wide variety of human, animal and even plant, i.e. biological afflictions, is on one count why for over 200 years homeopathy has been banned from standard medical practice.

So this is really an odd conundrum. On one hand, according to the CDC, the use of artificial imitative diseases, i.e. pathological similitude, is the only strategy for conveying immunity. On the other hand, its use is rejected by mainstream “medical” opinion . . per se..

It would appear that one hand is ignorant of the other.

A 27-year-old meta-analysis (systematic review) of homeopathy studies published in the British Medical Journal by Kleijnen et al says: “The amount of positive evidence even among the best studies came as a surprise to us. Based on this evidence we would be ready to accept that homeopathy can be efficacious, if only the mechanism of action were more plausible.” (BMJ, Kleijnen, 1991, p. 321)


Given the disbelief and squalling that surrounds homeopathy, which (according to the Washington Post) has the greatest amount of contention over any subject discussed in the Western world; with the exception of Christ, such an endorsement made by such a prestigious medical journal as the BMJ regarding the world’s only comprehensive precipitating pharmacy of cure would lead one to think that modern science within three decades would have plumbed its so-called “mechanism,” and with apologies to the persecuted Craft, kindly brought this orphaned doctrine of medicine into the conventional family of sciences.

But this has not been the case.

As I earlier implied while presenting the magnum of pathological similitude of the common vaccine, there is a second count of putative inscrutability against homeopathy, buoyed along by what masks itself as “settled science”. . and this is the failure of that stubbornly dogmatic “settled science,” to identify the phase shift in the solute and the tritiation [hydrogen potentization]  of the solvent in homeopathic pharmaceuticals.

With the exception of Rolland Conte, his team and myself, I have seen no real attempt to conventionalize homeopathy by attaching a handle on it from traditional physics or chemistry, when in fact recognized physico-chemical terms and tests exist that define and demonstrate what the homeopathic pharmacy is, what processes create it and how it works.

Throwing one of these ‘little’ sentences into an argument over whether homeopathy has a real chemistry to it or not is like throwing a stick of dynamite into an open fire . . and if you are a student of homeopathy you are now free to imagine the results: It blows open the door to a whole new line of supramolecular prophylaxis, supramolecular meaning ‘beyond the molecule’, prophylaxis meaning ‘action taken to prevent a disease’.”

This then is the purpose of this paper, to reveal to the world the Second Evolution of Prophylaxis, the clean, lean, energetic vaccine, the strength of the homeopathic remedy.

NEXT: A great discovery is exposed



Homeopathy vs. Bioterrorism

John Benneth unveils a new immunology, the Supramolecular Vaccine.

The Scientific Reasonableness of Homeopathy
by Royal S. Copeland, A.M., M.D.
Reprinted from The Chironian
May 1909

Protection of Mice from Tularemia Infection with Ultra-Low, Serial Agitated Dilutions Prepared from Francisella tularensis -Infected Tissue Wayne B. Jonas, Debra K. Dilner http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=

Providing evidence for the homeopathic law of similars (pathological similitude) is easy, prima facie in the smallpox vaccine and subsequent prophylaxis strategy. Immunization by imitating an infection is the soul of homeopathy. CDC – How Vaccines Work : https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf.
Okay, I’ll try harder! Using bovine variola, cowpox serum, to cure human variola, smallpox, is a perfect example of an application of the law of similars, “like cures like”, or pathological similitude, Even in the molecule, it’s use can be homeopathic. Elementary! CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf

Molecular dissociation is the key to understanding ultra-dilute homeopathic solutions, how the molecular solute is ionized into expanding electrons. Known in the early 1900’s, 2018 homeopathy paradox commentators are just now becoming aware of it https://www.scitechnol.com/peer-review/a-homeopathy-model-in-the-light-of-hahnemanns-pristine-idea-OxDN.php?article_id=7432

Supramolecular inoculation of Measles and other diseases

Supramolecular means “beyond the molecule” and here refers to the molecular dissociated solutes used in homeopathic medicine.

I pulled up on Twitter another outbreak of pathological skepticism today. These people are crying for a law to make Measles vaccinations mandatory. Yesterday they wanted to prosecute hydrolytic homeopathy for being against the law, today they want to stab you with a needle that pumps you full of their dirty molecular vaccine . . and make it law.

Given that to be forewarned is to be forearmed, let me first post a caveat about getting involved, this is an unusually contentious subject. The reputations of those who present this information publicly are always attacked. So I thought it would be appropriate today to flip that. There’s no need to force people to take common molecular vaccines as long as we have supramolecular prophylaxis, which it so happens to be perfectly lawful.

You might ask, “why are we not using it?”

It’s because of a witch hunt by academics, professional “skeptics” and the pharmaceutical companies they serve conducting a pogrom on the FDA sanctioned use of newly identified medical electrolytes, tritiated drugs and radiophamaceuticals, technical names for what have traditionally been used as “homeopathic remedies” for 200 years.

The witch hunters, calling themselves “skeptics” know only what they’re told to know. They don’t know what tritiated immunopharmaceuticals are, and even if they did, they wouldn’t know how to make them or apply them.

Allow me to show you an example of what I’m talking about.

Let’s take the Measles vaccine for example. Measles is more of a problem as a vaccine now than it used to be as a disease. The CDC says “Measles was declared eliminated (absence of continuous disease transmission for greater than 12 months) from the United States in 2000. This was thanks to a highly effective vaccination program in the United States, as well as better measles control in the Americas region.”

Snake bites and lightning strikes now take more lives than the Measles do, and sometimes people still get it anyway . . i.e. having been vaccinated for the Measles, they still get the Measles.

It’s since been discovered that the main cause of measles is malnutrition, specifically vitamin A. In the US, Measles is relatively rare, there’s not much of that deficiency . . in countries where there is a vitamin A deficiency measles is Legion. So that should stop and make us think, maybe the best prophylaxis for Measles is simply vitamin A.

Or would that be too costly?

If this bothers you, read on. It gets worse. Vitamin A isn’t going to save you from the pogrom if you believe in the use of supramolecular medicine to inoculate against epidemic disease, unless . . unless you got a better grip on science than they do and you can tell them what supramolecular prophylaxis is physically and chemically, what it does and how it works and last but not least, who authorized it.

What you need is a command of the literature on electrolytes, molecular dissociation and electron expansion beside a knowledge of physical, botanical, zoological and botanical tests for homeopathy. You also need a command of the laws that govern it, most of which is under your nose right now if you’re reading it off the Internet. Add to this a taste of plasma physics and quantum chemistry for the heavy artillery to back you up.

The hollow science mob will say that anyone who believes in homeopathy shall be regarded as a fraud or a fool. And that anyone who believes that supramolecular prophylaxis is effective is a danger to society. Gun in hand, needle full of their dirty molecular vaccine and your next stroke in the other, current immunology employs an 18th-century model of immunology. But the grip of rationalism loosened around the neck of medical empiricism long enough for one little discovery to escape and start a chain reaction that, as of today, is still going strong. Modern rationalist thinkers, i.e. pathological skeptics, unaware of hydro physics, bet their reputations, careers and large sums of money on that there is nothing in it, a claim repeatedly disproven ad nauseam.

Here’s the FDA’s position the use of the long challenged homeopathy in the supramolecular treatment of measles by John H. Clarke, M.D.

Morbillin. The nosode of Measles.

Successful clinical treatment of Catarrh. Coryza. Cough. Ear, affections of. Eye, affections of. Measles. Skin, affections of.

Characteristics.─The well-known symptoms which characterise an attack of measles may all be taken as guides for its homœopathic use. Its chief use hitherto has been as a prophylactic against infection, and to clear up after effects of an attack. My own use of it has been confined to the 30th and higher, but there is no bar upon lower potencies, and those who prefer them may begin with the 6th. As a prophylactic given to those who are, or may be, exposed to infection, I prescribe a dose of the 30th twice or thrice daily. For an attack of the disease I find nothing better than Morbil. 30, eight or ten globules in six ounces of water, a dessertspoonful every two hours.─The effect of this is heightened by giving alternately Bell. 30 in the same way. These two medicines will be sufficient to carry through any uncomplicated case, and in my experience do even better than Pulsatilla. As the measles poison has a great affinity for the mucous passages, the eyes, the ears and the respiratory mucous membranes, Morbil. may be used in such cases like any other homœopathic remedy, when the symptoms correspond.

Relations.─Complementary: Bell. Compare: Puls., Hep., Merc., Sul.

” -from the FDA recommended Morbillinum in the DICTIONARY OF PRACTICAL MATERIA MEDICA by John Henry CLARKE, M.D. http://homeoint.org/clarke/m/morbil.htm

Let me make a brief observation here. I would say to the man and a few women who are suffering from pathological skepticism, that homeopathy, defined within their repertoire, is never footnoted by the actual literature, which includes the particular statute. Skeptics only quote skeptics, and when confronted by the literature they are ignorant of, will panic, deny it, dismiss it, then return to personally attacking the reporter and his credentials.

Contrary to what opponents of homeopathy would have us believe, the use of homeopathic medicine to counteract epidemic diseases is backed by high authority. Clarke was a medical doctor practicing homeopathy in Piccadilly back in the first half of the 20th century, and is the only medical doctor referenced by name in 400.400 of the Federal Drug and Cosmetics Act governing homeopathy, authored by another medical doctor, Sen. Royal Copeland, MD. of New York, sponsor of the Act. Copeland is notable here, not just as the author of the law that sanctions the use of homeopathic medicine, but also as the first reporter of the theory of how it works. [In my previous entry I posted Copeland’s theory of molecular dissociation as the process for extending the solute throughout infinite dilution.]

It can be truthfully said homeopathic medicines, including Morbillin and homeopathic remedies for other diseases such as mumps, whoopimg cough, smallpox, cancer, just about any disease, named and unnamed, if it’s got symptoms, homeopathy has got a cure for it sanctioned by law in CPG Sec. 400.400 “Conditions Under Which Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed.”

400.400 “A guide to the use of homeopathic drugs (including potencies, dosing, and other parameters) may be found by referring to the following texts: A Dictionary of Practical Materia Medica by John Henry Clarke, M.D., (3 volumes; Health Science Press) and A Clinical Repertory to the Dictionary of Materia Medica by John Henry Clarke, M.D. (Health Science Press). These references must be reviewed in conjunction with other available literature on these drug substances.”

So here is an FDA endorsed piece of the literature by a British medical doctor on what technically could be called homeoprophylaxis, the use of homeopathic pharmaceuticals to cure and inoculate against disease. If there’s any question about the use of the word “cure”, it appears 1,352 times in this three volume semiological register listing the properties and action of 1000 traditional homeopathic remedies, tested and proven in countless thousands of cases by numerous medical doctors http://homeoint.org/clarke/index.htm

Here’s Clarke on Parotidinum, the supramolecular nosode of Mumps.

Clinical.─Glandular affections. Meningitis. Mumps. Orchitis. Salivation.

Characteristics.─Parotidinum has been used as a prophylactic against infection by mumps. In this instance it is generally given in the 6th or 30th two or three times a day to those exposed to infection. In the disease itself it may be given every four hours, either by itself or alternated with other indicated remedies. The well-known complications which sometimes occur with mumps, cerebral inflammation and orchitis suggest its possible use in these conditions.

Relations.─Compare: Merc.

Wikipedia, Rubella- “The molecular basis for the causation of congenital rubella syndrome are not yet completely clear, but in vitro studies with cell lines showed that rubella virus has an apoptotic effect on certain cell types. There is evidence for a 53-dependent mechanism”. Megyeri K, Berencsi K, Halazonetis TD, et al. (June 1999). “Involvement of a p53-dependent pathway in rubella virus-induced apoptosis”. Virology. 259 (1): 74–84.1] I suspect it’s Hungarian

It is superbly ironic, that by their own admission, rubella can act as a homeopathic type treatment for cancer. Frankly, I don’t think the molecular basis for the cause of any disease is clear to present day self-styled authorities, This is because the transmission of disease is not molecular, it is supramolecular, and the placeboites are fourth phase retarded.

I suggest you stay on top of this, share with your friends, and read the next entry if I can manage another.


Hydrolytic note-

Our fundamental working tool here is hydrogen, which I don’t see it as a definable, particle, but rather a phase jumping fractal. I believe it’s a hydrogen vortex of energy that is both local and universal, even trans universal, and this comes from the suggestion that the hydrogen atom is a vortex either coming from or going to another universe . . or phase, and this is attested to by the law of the kosmotrope, which says the smallest entity, which is the kosmotrope, creates order, and the largest, the chaotrope, destroys it. Modern popular science belief rates the electron as a fundamental particle, meaning they believe it has no structure. Its properties however, as seen in the testing and use of supramolecular medicines prove otherwise.

Copyright John Benneth 2018

#HOMEOPATHY: Ebola, Science, Politics, Prevention and Cure

I’ve been MIA from this blog since September 14th. I won’t go into details just yet as to why your correspondent has not made an entry for so long, but life must go on, so I have come out of grief and hiding long enough to bring you up to date on some very interesting developments on the world’s most controversial subject . . 

According to an email received November 15th, 2014 from Dr. V. Krishnaamurthy of West Mambalam, Chennai in India, there have been three complete cures of Ebola within an hour after taking a single high dose of an isotopic drug potency of Lachesis mutata, a pharmaceutical approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Adminsitraation (FDCA) for use in the treatment for hemorrhagic fever.


You might want to read that last paragraph again and commit it to memory; what follows gets worse . . and you might forget the killshot: that it’s been approved by the FDCA for about 80 years now.

Unfortunately, the objective supramolecular chemistry of this drug, like others in its class, is confused with its subjective “like cures like” application; FDCA proven effective as it may be, and so misunderstood as it is, neither the drug nor its method of selection is taken seriously, by anyone . . really.

Until now . .


The historical facts not only reveal that the Ebola epidemic that has raged throughout Western Africa can be easily controlled homeopathically, but demand that it be stopped homeopathically.

Homeopathy has been a sidebar, in medicine given that there’s more money in extending disease than in curing it, so the medical profession has propagated the notion that homeopathic  remedies are inert, when in fact their active component appears undetectable to those who are looking for some high school chemical explanation, the answer lies in nuclear physics, as in medical isotopes.

Given past performances . . like when I brought it up at the Cavendish at Brian Josephson’s symposium . . this should start a riot among those who abbreviate themselves as skeptics and bloviate themselves as scientists . . armchair scientists that is, so I come prepared, with every jot and tittle. I expect to be called a liar first and checked out for facts second, at which time I expect some apologies due.

We already have in hand the necessary proven, tried and tested, FDCA regulated and protected drugs for the prevention and cure of West African hemorrhagic fevers such as Ebola. Moreover, novel as it may seem, we can also administer prophylaxis (prevention of disease) to entire populations to safely prevent people from contracting the disease using these same isotopic materials we use to cure it.


It’s not that we haven’t tried to use them. Four M.D.’s bearing an armamentarium of over 125 isotopic drugs selected semiologically for the symptoms of Ebola, hand in glove on the doorsteps of Liberian hospitals, offered to use them curatively, repeatedly, but were turned away, repeatedly, by directives from the Old  World Health Organization (OWHO).


To be kind, we could say the problem is that although these drugs are legal, and their action well proven in countless clinical tests by medical doctors for over two hundred years . . to the present day,  their use voluminously documented, indexed and growing, they were developed in a time well before the advent of nuclear science, and so they still bear that 19th century stigma. Medical science grew up around that stigma, bearing along with it the same  misconceptions of homeopathy today that it had  then, not understanding their isotopic nature, or what they were, or how they worked, and while relying on past confusion about their physics, shrugged them off under the pall of ridicule and abuse, and continuing the homeopathic “inquisition” to this present day.

And so, around this, has grown some sharp thorns and rather dicey apples.

A rescuing man or woman might say “rather than arguing about it , why not just give it a try?” and by the time they’re finished with this short essay they might say it with tears in their eyes. But without some major arm wrestling,  it’s not going to happen.  The reason why, I fear, is because just as there are those among us  who are afraid it won’t work, there are those who are afraid it will . . !!!

You will find this is not the only stop. So bear with me a little more while I attempt to explain this curse for the edification of all. And this is important, because modern medical science is missing a huge opportunity: :


Diluted “homeopathic” drugs are esssntially medical isotopes.  An isotope is the radioactive form of an element. All matter can be made radioactive, especially water, since water has an absorptivity and emissivity rate index second only to an ideal black box material, such as carbon soot, and it is water that is the primary vehicle for most of the drugs used in homeopathic medicine . .  and I emphasize most because not all drugs used in homeopathy are aqueous dilutes.

A medical isotope is a very small quantity of a radioactive substance used in mainstream medicine for safe, cost-effective imaging and treatment of disease. Ditritium oxide, 3H20, also known as superheavy water, pure water made radioactive in the environment, is an example of a medical isotope, more specifically the hydrogen isotope in water . . used in mainstream medicine. 3H2O then is a perfect corollary for a physical explanation of the water based drugs carrying a radiant taint of the diluent’s guest starting material, the radioactive signal, or isotope of any material processed in what are popularly known as homeopathic remedies.


A common question, or challenge to homeopathy, has been that it’s ridiculous to assume that plain water can have a memory, and that there’s no proof of it. But the problem with skeptical thinking (and it’s really not skeptical in a classical or global sense) is it presupposes that by the usual standards of authoritative science, that what shouldn’t be isn’t, and so, when it hits what it appears to be an anomaly, it skips to a pre-made answer, that the anomaly exists on the part of the sender as a  fraud, and on the part of the receiver, or buyer, as a delusion, and around this paradigm it becomes invested, emotionally and then monetarily, and any information that contradicts the pre-made answer is rejected; this is exactly what has happened with homeopathy and most of the scientific community that attends to it . . but with some glaring contradictions  that explode the basic underlying myth, that homeopathic drugs are inert.

To get around this requires the persistent application of mass cognitive therapy, and depite an occasonal excursion, that, in a term, cognitive therapy for homeopathy deniers is what this blog is primarily about.

3H20, ditritium oxide, then  is a naked, well known and accepted, prima facie example of what not only answers the primary objection to homeopathy, that pure water cannot be made active in a way that has specific biological  effects; it raises the question as to how is it that water can become radioactive in the environment,  retain a radiant signal, or a memory, and transmit it?

This should raise some objections, and certainly it will among the hardcore “skeptics”,  but to date, in presenting the “radiant water” evidence and the “3H2O Argument” for homeopathy to top researchers on the subject, no one has yet been able to explain it, even though it is widely stated that naked Tritium, the designated driver of ditritium oxide, has a half life of 12 years, and that under water based “homeopathic remedies,” when fixed with solid material media, are known to retain their action indefinitely.

The strength of this medicine then (among other things which will be explained further, later, perhaps much later, i.e. the physics of H2O adsorption and emissivity) has also been its downfall. Not knowing that they are in technical reality medical isotopes, or radiopharmaceuticals, “homeopathic remedies” have been conflated with their intended use: Homeopathically, the principal of which is” like cures like.”

The drugs most often used in this novel application of sympathetic medicine called “homeopathy” have then been misnomered as “homeopathic,” which is not a physico-chemical term, whereas “medical isotope” is.


Homeopathy then has grown up as a problem child, misnomered and mischaracterized, which even its best practitioners and scientists, buffeted by a storm of censure, shrink back from . . i.e. its demonstrable plasma physics. Begging your forgiveness then for such a long read, you can hopefully understand the neccesity to present such detail to this tangled yarn in he hopes in understanding it you and others will be able to untangle the skein . .

According to the Washington Post, a study of edit changes on a popular online encyclopedia shows homeopathy has become one of two of the world’s most controversial and contentious subjects, ahead of, if not equal to, Jesus Christ, both known to be great healers, the electrical force majeure of both just now becoming understood . .

Does this explain the log jam in Liberia?


The first known homeopathic remedies were sent to Monrovia in Liberia by the International Emergency Management Organization (IEMO, Rome) in September, 2014; the author sent a second load in mid October. By October 19th, 2014, four homeopathically trained medical doctors, one each from the U.S., India, Switzerland and Spain, arrived in Monrovia. They were sent by the Liga Medicorum Homoeopathica Internationalis (LMHI), the International Organization of Homeopathic Physicians. On November 6th, 2014, the Washington Post announced that the number of reported Ebola cases had dropped in Liberia, and Monrovia was returning to normal.

MORE TO COME: . click on the free subscription to the John Benneth Journal to receive notification of the next entry detailing homeopathy in Africa . .

HELP: If you can help, we need you to contact us at once at 503-819-7777, or email us at jrbenneth@aol.com. In response to the crisis, we have “written the book” on the homeopathic treatment of hemorrhagic fever: Ebola Prophylaxis and Cure and we need help to continue furnishing aid to Liberian clinics.

We need help if we are to continue involvement in this crisis.

Pre-emptive copies of Ebola Prophylaxis and Cure, sent to some of the top minds in homeopathy, are receiving encouraging reviews if not rave reviews such as “amazing work.” Of course, “the envelope of puffery is unlimited in its facility for expansion,” but it should not require special leverage to get you to read it, as we offer to you this historical piece of work free, gratis, and at no charge . . no charge more, that is, other than the potential imprecation for ignoring it as the lifesaver it is for the world’s most notorious epidemic, and the prayer that you commit yourself to help.

Please help . .

Willingly you may ask “what more need be said?” before touching the download button, but allow us first to say, do not take us to be so naïve as to think we are not aware of its cost, and that this will not be met with added costs, beginning with a fury of opposition and attempts to discredit us; and please do not take us to be so full of bravado and hubris to think that we can do this without your material support; we need your help, and more than just Liberia, it includes now and in the future the other affected countries in Africa, which now includes Mali.

This would not be a crisis if the opposition of dogma did not exist. Do not you be so naïve as to question why it is that the prevailing form of medicine does not climb down from its rafter to take this solution in hand; it can’t do it, it can’t admit that there is a quick, simple cure in hand for Ebola; the walls of their justice, their imperium, could not stand the strain, and it would fall, and its inhabitants would be homeless.

There are many words dwelling in the ellipsis that are not said, but we are trying to pare them away: Dr. Martin Salia, the Sierra Leone doctor who died from Ebola in an Omaha, Nebraska, the last to date to succumb from it on American soil . . to put it conservatively, may have died needlessly, as have thousands of others in other parts of the world, as may thousands more if homeopathy is not put to the test, or in the past-perfect and future imperative, died, and will die, without it.

The application of a simple cure takes great effort.

Read Ebola Prophylaxis and Cure for free

Most of the wealthy operators, the medical doctors, the physicians, the operators of the medical industry complex for which intellectual property rights . . patents, patent medicines . . are the life blood, have no application or interest (other than to fear it) for what you will read in Ebola Prophylaxis and Cure. It first details the statutory instructions to the U.S. American public for the rare FDCA support of the heretofore mostly unknown use of homeopathic drugs intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or the prevention of disease in man or other animals; for your edification and encouragement in the use of this remarkable medicine, Ebola Prophylaxis and Cure names the FDCA’s primary authority and reference, linking you to a huge online compendium of over 1000 FDCA approved homeopathic drugs with full, comprehensive descriptions of the ones most used.

Do not be fooled by professional skeptics and pseudoscientists into thinking this is quackery. They will attempt to discredit it. To save their reputations, and to keep from becoming the objects of the same scorn they once heaped on homeopathy, will use whatever means they have before them to quash it.

DO NOT ignore this opportunity before it is removed because of lack of support.

Read it for yourself. Ebola Prophylaxis and Cure summarizes and gives online links to the detailed history of the homeopathic cure of hemorrhagic fevers, as are manifested in Ebola and other similar epidemics. It reveals the physics behind homeopathy; it repertorizes the symptoms of Ebola, showing which remedies out of 1000 are the best for each stage of the disease, and provides online links to comprehensive reviews of each drug in the FDCA recommended compendium.

Furthermore, Ebola Prophylaxis and Cure does what few if any modern western homeopaths can or are willing to do. It not only shows which remedies to consider, for those who are inexperienced, standing under the arch of doubt, it shows which potencies to use, when to give them at what intervals of time for each stage of the disease.

Help stop the Ebola epidemic dead in its tracks throughout west Africa and the world. Learn how to apply homeopathy in a deadly epidemic such as this one. If you are a medical professional this is required reading.
Download Ebola Prophylaxis and Cure by clicking on the link below.

If you are so inclined you could send your contribution to us through your Pay Pal account to jrbenneth@aol.com. A dollar would not be too little, nor would a suggestion, we expect $50 and would swoon over $1000. Or you could just give me a call. We really need your help. 503 819 7777

DOWNLOAD Ebola Prophylaxis and Cure PDF book FREE = click here: EBOLA PROPHYLAXIS AND CURE 111414 update


Stay in touch, there’s more to come . .


How Bad Homeopathy Saved 3,000,000 Australian Children

How Bad Homeopathy Saved 3,000,000 Australian Children by John Benneth

But some want to pull the plug . .

The “homeopathy” debate is rife with misnomers. The opponents take the proven practice of homoeopathy [homoeotherapy, curing a disease by creating a temporary artificial disease by giving a substance that causes the same symptoms as those of the disease to be cured] and conflating it with an ignorance of posology, the issue of dosage, how much of a particular medicine is given, and in what material phase.

Posology is the only reasonable or scientific concern that should be before us now.

But alas, other issues, like an artificial disease, prevail. So it is the job of this journal to separate  and analyze them. You should find the widespread ignorance of the conflation to be alarming, if not startling . .

“When the ratio of diluent to medicine is as low as 100:1 and if very many succussions were forced into it by a powerful machine, we would obtain medicines that, especially in the higher degrees of dynamization, would act almost instantaneously but with intense, even dangerous violence, particularly on a delicate patient, without bringing about the permanent, gentle counteraction of the vital principle.” Hahnemann, Samuel. The Organon of Medicine, Para. 270p. 114, 6th edition J. P. TARCHER, INC. Los Angeles, distributed by Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston PDF ONLINE at http://hpathy.com/wp-content/uploads/group-documents/41/1330840219-organonofmedicine.pdf

The current example of this chronic dilemma of homoeopathy can be seen in reports from the Southern Hemisphere hinting at a draft paper by Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) that says “homeopathic remedies” are no more effective than a placebo “when used to treat 68 health conditions.”


Worries are being expressed that the NHMRC’s implied review of the literature may lead to stricter regulations for the use of “homeopathic” products and homeopathic therapy.

The NHMRC is painting putative beliefs with the color of science. The NHMRC is promoting pseudoscience.

Simply labeling “homeopathy” as “placebo” is a tip off that the NHMRC is practicing pseudoscience. No comprehensive review of the literature of clinical trials of homeopathy concludes that the effects of homeopathy are solely due to the placebo effect. [I say solely because the placebo effect is indiscriminate, it logically makes no distinction between allopathy and homoeopathy, inert or potent medicine. In fact, a rather clever argument could be made postulating that the palliations and arch dramas of allopathy’s heroic “medicine” enhance the placebo effect!]

The point is, there is no scientific support for the illiterate allegation that “homeopathy is a placebo.” [If I am wrong, please feel free to correct me on this in the comment section of this blog and give us links to the double blind RCT’s published in peer reviewed journals that test the placebo effect for homeopathy] What is  so ridiculous about the NHMRC complaint  is that what both homeopaths and allopaths, (allopath being the name used by homeopaths for a conventional medical doctor, his government handler or anyone who subscribes to allopathic medicine) are ignoring is that beginning in the late 18th century, and traversing through the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries . . to this day. . homeopathy has been used to quench epidemics, disguised as allopathy! Allopaths alone, in the use of the vaccine, have nakedly made homeopathy-in-the-crude, or more simply put, bad homoeopathy, the world’s most widespread medical application . . and as such, has saved millions of lives.

It may be bad homoeopathy, but it is still homoeopathy! In Australia, it has saved an estimated 3,000,000 children alone!

Allow me to elucidate . .

I’ve written about this repeatedly in previous blogs. And I think the cure may be starting to take. Literal and intended definitions of homoeopathy, or it’s transmogrification into homeopathy, mean the use of an artificial disease to cure a natural one.

This is a simple fact. Homoeopathy refers to a strategy of stimulating the natural endogenous process organisms electromagnetically apply to maintain homeostasis as a way to defeat disease, whatever it may be. Just as like solvents will dissolve one another, and like poles will repel one another, like diseases will cure one another.

This is no mere fancy or fiction. It is a salient fact. Such is the dictionary definition of homeotherapy, the treatment of a disease by giving a substance similar to the agent that caused the disease.

Now . . one of the last things I want to do is argue with my old friend, my best literary friend, my only concomitant friend  Daniel Webster, but it bears repeating from the header, that Hahnemannian medicine would amend this definition to say that homeopatherapy, or more correctly spelled “homoeopathy” is  the treatment of a disease by giving a substance that causes the same symptoms similar to those of the one to be cured . .

The misnomers do not alter my point: There is no mention of the use of diluted substances to restore homeostasis in the translated defintion of homeo- or homoeotherapy, homeo- or homoeopathy. This is a medical jinx.  It is what confounds the NHMRC and their like. Homeopathy does not require dilution of pharmaceutical agents in order to achieve prophylaxis or cure. The proofs for this statement should cause a sudden abatement of breath, followed by an order to cease and desist the assault on homeopathy, homoeopathy, homoeotherapy or their respective cognates.

The operative principle of homoeopathy, call it homeostasis, like cures like, or medical similitude, is the effective principle for all epidemiology. This is a palladium that has  obviously not been fully recognized by the medical recession, and has yet to come into its own, as can be currently seen in the edicts dribbling out of the Commonwealth countries, like the one we’re being urninated on now by the NHMRC. To outlaw homeopathy they would, by definition, have to outlaw conventional vaccinations.  Conventional disease prophylaxis under NHMRC condemnation would have to cease, because conventional vaccination is homeopathy! !

To outlaw homeopathy as such bans a natural phenomenon, as without human intervention, one disease will push out one that is similar to it, the examples for which follow.

The prime example of natural homeopathic prophylaxis is the small pox vaccine. Smallpox by the 1970’s was entirely eradicated by injections of serum from bovine variola, putatively known as cow pox, a disease in cattle similar to human variola. When cowpox is forced on humans by knife cut or needle injection, it sports the same reaction as their own endemic disease, but milder, creating an immunity, or cure, of scourging small pox. That after 200 years of successful application the principle of homeoprophylaxis is still not recognized is shocking.

The upgrade from variolation to vaccine was winked at in the observation that milk maids, noted for their beautiful complexions, were made routinely immune to smallpox, because of their exposure to its analogue. As a result they rarely if ever contracted small pox.

It could be legally said then, that homoeopathy, as a strategy of immunization, cured the world of small pox, the first pandemic disease to be totally eradicated by persistent, organized human effort.

By the same process of homoeopathy, known from Hahnemann and others, we can also see examples of how the disease of small pox and others, such as the whooping cough, [which first brought “homeopathy” to the stern attention of the NHMRC, have homoeopathically had their own curative effects:


Hahnemann The Organon,Para. 46

We could cite very many examples of homoeopathic cures brought about by natural diseases with similar symptoms. But since we require precise and indubitable data we shall confine ourselves to the small number, always true to type, arising from unvarying miasms, which give them a distinct name.


Smallpox, prominent among them and so notorious for its many violent symptoms, has removed and cured a host of ills that have similar symptoms.

How common are the ophthalmias of smallpox and how violent, even to blindness!

Through inoculation, smallpox completely and permanently cured chronic eye inflammation in a case cited by Dezoteux a and in another cited by Leroy. b


A person who was blind for two years after the suppression of a scalp eruption completely recovered his sight after smallpox, according to Klein. c


How often has smallpox not brought about deafness and dyspnea! And it removed both these chronic complaints when it reached its acme, as J. F. Closs observes. d


Swelling of the testicles, even very severe, is a frequent symptom of smallpox; and that is why it could, by similarity, cure a large, hard swelling of the left testicle caused by a trauma (Klein). e Another observer also notes that it cured a similar testicular swelling. f


Among the unpleasant complaints that occur in smallpox there is a particular dysentery like stool; and so by similarity, smallpox has cured dysentery (F. Wendt). g


It is well known that when smallpox is contracted during cowpox immediately wipes out the cowpox homoeopathically and aborts it, both because of its greater strength and because of its close similarity. On the other hand, if the cowpox is already near maturity, because

of its great similarity to the supervening smallpox, the latter is at least greatly attenuated homoeopathically, h and milder, as Mühry i and many others have stated.


In the lymph of the cowpox inoculation there is, in addition to the element that protects against smallpox, a quite different substance that causes an overall skin eruption usually of small, dry (sometimes rather large, suppurating) pimples surrounded by a red areola and often intermixed with round red spots, often itching most violently.

In many children this eruption comes out several days before appearance of the red cowpox areola, but more often it comes out several days afterward and then disappears in a couple of days, leaving behind small, hard, red spots. It is through their similarity to this secondary infectious agent that skin eruptions of children, often very old and troublesome ones, are homoeopathically cured, completely and permanently, by the cowpox vaccination as soon as it takes, something many observers have noticed. f


Cowpox, which has a characteristic swelling of the arm among its symptoms, k cured a swollen, half-paralyzed arm after breaking out. l


The fever that comes in cowpox with the appearance of the red areola has cured (homoeopathically) two cases of intermittent fever, as Hardege the Younger reports. m

This confirms J. Hunter’s remark that two fevers (similar diseases) cannot exist in the same body at the same time. n


There is much similarity between the fevers and coughs of measles and those of whooping cough. In an epidemic where these two diseases raged simultaneously, Bosquillon noticed that many children who had just had measles remained free from whooping cough. o They would all have remained permanently free of whooping cough and would have been rendered immune by the measles if whooping cough were not just partly similar to measles, i.e., if it also had a similar skin eruption. That is why measles protected only a number of children from the whooping cough, and only during that epidemic.

But when measles meets a disease that is similar to it in its main symptom – the eruption it will undeniably destroy and cure it homoeopathically.

Thus a chronic herpetic eruption was cured p ( homoeopathically) promptly, completely, and permanently by and eruption of measles, as Kortum observes. q

Hahnemann, Samuel. The Organon of Medicine 6th edition, p. 26-27, Para 46,  J. P. TARCHER, INC. Los Angeles, distributed by Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston


In his footnotes to cowpox attenuating smallpox in the above (h) Hahnemann states,

“This seems to be the reason for the remarkable salutary result of the widespread use of Jenner’s cowpox vaccination. The smallpox has not since then appeared among us with such widespread virulence. Forty or fifty years ago, when a city was stricken, it lost at least half, often three-quarters of its children.” ibid


So within 40 years the homoeopathic application of a zoonotic disease had significantly reduced the virulence of a similar but more serious human one in the general human population, and within 175 years completely eradicated it.

Imagine for a moment a modern city today losing three quarters of its children to small pox. Imagine Australia, with a population of 20 million, of which four million are children under 15, losing three quarters of its children, three million (3,000,000) to small pox because of the failure to make homoeopathic use of cowpox, which is exactly what the smallpox vaccine does.

Vaccinations for small pox are no longer given because small pox no longer exists! It was wiped out by homoeopathy!

Imagine the survivors, some blinded, some deafened, partially paralyzed, horribly disfigured . . yet this is what the principle of homoeopathy has prevented.

When will the governing health bodies of the First World countries and their tag-alongs recognize this?

S        U        B        S        C        R        I        B        E


UPDATED June 18th, 2019

All vaccines are homeopathic. The small pox vaccine was the greatest medical achievement of all time. In the midst of modern commercialized medicine’s atrocities, it is highly significant, if not profound, to find a beacon, that Jenner’s discovery was Hahnemann’s proof, and that the greatest medical achievement of all time is homeopathy.

All curative medicine and effective disease prophylaxis is homeopathic. Homeopathy employs the magnetic principle of like repels like and the chemical principle of solvents, like dissolves like.

All vaccinations are homeopathic, and by that it is meant they are prima facie homeopathic, anyone can see it, on its face value, as well as scientifically. The misperception of what homeopathy is has prohibited the further use of it as effective medicine. Homeopathy is effective in more than just its crude use in vaccines and anti-venoms.

This is not just another piece of information, this is a profound revelation, perhaps the most profound of our age, because it foretells the end of disease. The small pox vaccine is regarded as the greatest medical achievement of our age, and so to say that it is homeopathic is a stunning piece of news.


To understand that all vaccinations are homeopathic is of critical importance to world health. In Australia, opponents of homeopathy are attempting to restrict the public’s access to it and their right to know. This is a threat to freedom of choice, the right to choose what kind of medical treatment a person will have, and freedom of information . . access to medical studies.

Opponents will say that homeopathy is not evidence based medicine, but this is a lie. The evidence for homeopathy was developed by clinicians observing the reactions of countless patients and “provers” to the materials used in homeopathic medicine. There are numerous tests and assays that show the physical structure, chemical properties and biochemical action of homeopathic pharmaceuticals.

Homeopathy is the most evidence based medicine on the planet.

How can anyone make an educated choice if information is being withheld from them? In this case, it’s about the use of homeopathy in disease prophylaxis, for the prevention and treatment of things like whooping cough.

The irony of it is, is that the same people who are telling the public to avoid homeopathy and to get vaccinated are in essence doing nothing more than promoting a crude form of the very thing they’re opposing. Technically, they’re practicing homeopathy. The people who are opposing it are practicing it.

Look at how vaccines are made for proof.

Here is Wikipedia’s definition of vaccine: “A vaccine typically contains an agent that resembles a disease-causing microorganism, and is often made from weakened or killed forms of the microbe, its toxins or one of its surface proteins.”

You could say exactly the same thing about homeopathy, and no one, not the people who promote homeopathy nor the people who oppose it could reasonably say you’re wrong. You can simply switch the word “homeopathic remedy” for “vaccine” in the Wikipedia definition and technically you’d still be right in both definitions, because the word homeopathy refers to its first principle, the use of similars to treat, prevent and cure disease.


Read the Wikipedia article on homeopathy again and switch the words “homeopathic remedy” for “vaccine” and see how it reads: “A homeopathic remedy typically contains an agent that resembles a disease-causing microorganism, and is often made from weakened or killed forms of the microbe, its toxins or one of its surface proteins.”

There you have it, homeopathic remedies contain an agent that RESEMBLES a disease causing microorganism. That’s the principle of similitude, the study of which is the science of homeopathy.

But it goes further to show that modern vaccines also make use of the second principle of homeopathy, which is attenuation. It says, “it is often made from WEAKENED or KILLED forms of the microbe, its toxins or one of its surface proteins.”

A vaccine is doing exactly the same thing a homeopathic remedy does, eliciting a response from the immune system. That’s what cures you. Not the chemical, but the reaction to one dose of it, which is the third principle of homeopathy, the minimum dose, the highly restrained posology.


The problem here with vaccination is that people are using homeopathic procedures and treatment without any understanding of what they are! In 2012 they still haven’t learned the principles and intricacies of similitude and they still haven’t learned how to properly cut the dose, and they still haven‘t learned to apply what they already know is effective in epidemiology to clinical use in idiopathic diseases.

What’s happening in Australia is happening in other parts of the Anglo-American world where they’re trying to prevent whooping cough and other diseases by crude vaccination. They’re attacking a better understanding of the very thing they’re using.

But in other parts of the world, such as in India, Cuba and Brazil, where the public isn’t being duped by advertising for patent drugs, homeopathy is booming.

If physicians are going to administer vaccines, then they will be using a dangerously crude, harmful if not deadly form of homeopathy.

How do they think immunization is conferred? They appear to think it can only be done molecularly, at the condensed phase level, when in fact it is done in the energetic phase, even over the impediment of condensed matter, with or without the seminal molecule, but exponentially more effective in the energetic plasma phase as an ionized pharmaceutical, processed in the homeopathic method of hydrolytically stripping it of its molecular cloak and anchor.

This is the true pharmacology of verum, real medicine.

To do their jobs physicians must  study it, learn it and know it. They have to practice it clinically under teachers who are experienced in its use. They must go to school and learn it. They must learn it at medical schools that teach it.

Follow the John Benneth Journal on Twitter:

 Follow JBennethJournal on Twitter